7th Circuit Court of Appeals and Indiana Tax Court issued no Indiana opinions by IL deadline.
Indiana Supreme Court
Charlie White, et. al. v. Indiana Democratic Party, through its Chairman , Daniel J. Parker
49S00-1202-MI-73
Miscellaneous. Reverses a decision by Marion Circuit Judge Lou Rosenberg, which found that Charlie White was not eligible
to take office following the November 2010 election because he had improperly registered to vote at an address where he was
not living. Justice Brent Dickson concurred in result, but wrote separately to say that he agreed with the election contest
being dismissed because he sees the Legislature’s attempt to impose additional eligibility qualifications on candidates
as unconstitutional and not a basis to contest someone’s eligibility for office.
Michael R. Kole, Joseph L. Weingarten, and Glenn J. Brown, et al. v. Scott Faultless, Daniel Henke,
Eileen Pritchard, Stuart Easley, et al.
94S00-1112-CQ-692
Certifiable question. Responding to a certifiable question from Judge Tanya Walton Pratt of the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of Indiana, the Supreme Court held that Indiana’s Government Modernization Act does allow a town to
reorganize as a second class city wherein a city council elected at large then elects a mayor. If voters approve of referendums
to that effect in November, the reorganization of the town of Fishers and Fall Creek Township may proceed as proposed.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Canon
Harper v. State of Indiana
10A01-1012-CR-687
Criminal. Affirms convictions for dealing in cocaine, possession of cocaine, dealing in a narcotic drug, and possession of
a narcotic drug, all Class A felonies; two counts of resisting law enforcement, battery of a law enforcement officer, and
possession of paraphernalia, all Class A misdemeanors; and maintaining a common nuisance, a Class D felony. Holds that even
though Harper did not possess the contraband found in a search of a purse and hotel room, the fact that the purse was in his
car and the hotel room was rented in his name was sufficient to establish constructive possession.
Ayanna
Wright and American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 62, Local 4009, AFL-CIO v. City of Gary,
Indiana
45A04-1107-PL-362
Civil plenary. Reverses trial court’s determination that an arbitrator in a collective bargaining agreement dispute
exceeded his powers when he determined that Wright should be placed into another job, despite a city ordinance that stated
the new position was not covered by the CBA.
Irmina
Gradus-Pizlo, M.D., and Select Specialty Hospital Indianapolis, Inc. v. Donald Acton
49A02-1106-CT-503
Civil tort. Reverses trial court’s denial of motion for summary judgment in favor of Acton, holding that genuine issues
of material fact exist with respect to the commencement of the statute of limitations for Acton’s proposed medical malpractice
complaint.
Brad
A. Altevogt, et al. v. Dennis L. Brand, et al.
44A03-1106-MI-237
Miscellaneous. Affirms trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants, holding the trial court
did not err in rejecting the plaintiffs’ claim of title of the disputed land by public dedication because the plat did
not dedicate the Indian Trail to the public, but instead indicated that the Indian Trail was for the use of the lot owners
and their guests. The trial court also properly concluded that the plaintiffs had not established all of the elements of adverse
possession.
T.H.
b/n/f Sonja Lynetter (Walls) Fitzgerald v. Troy Hutchison (NFP)
82A01-1109-JP-438
Juvenile. Reverses trial court’s order suspending parenting time for and issuing protective order against father. Affirms
court’s finding that mother was in contempt.
Susan
R. May v. State of Indiana (NFP)
47A05-1103-CR-178
Criminal. Affirms sentence for murder.
Charles
R. Smith v. State of Indiana (NFP)
78A04-1110-CR-585
Criminal. Affirms sentence for Class B felony dealing in a Schedule II controlled substance.
Ernest
Wireman v. State of Indiana (NFP)
75A05-1008-CR-545
Criminal. Affirms convictions of and sentence for murder, Class A felony attempted murder and Class B felony arson.
Odonis
D. Parker v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A03-1108-CR-381
Criminal. Affirms sentence for Class B felony robbery.
Shawn
McDonald v. State of Indiana (NFP)
35A05-1110-CR-529
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class C felony possession of cocaine.
KSM,
LLC v. Lighthouse Storage, LLC, Lawyers Title Ins. Corp., Inc., and Kevin and Stephen Corp. (NFP)
02A03-1106-PL-232
Civil plenary. Affirms grant of summary judgment in favor of Lighthouse Storage, holding court did not abuse its discretion
in ordering rescission of the purchase contract. Reverses trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Lawyers
Title on KSM’s negligent misrepresentation claim and grant of summary judgment in favor of a KSM manager on Lighthouse’s
actual fraud claim. Remands for further proceedings.
John
Mitchem v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-1108-CR-421
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class B felony burglary and Class D felony theft.
Tyson
Keplinger v. State of Indiana (NFP)
35A02-1104-PC-359
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petitions for post-conviction relief.














vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.