ILNews

Opinions March 16, 2012

March 16, 2012
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions by IL deadline.

7th Circuit Court of Appeals

Harry Foster III and Linda Foster v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
11-3100
United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division, Judge Theresa L. Springman.
Civil. Affirms District Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, holding the Fosters’ failure to produce requested documents was a material breach of their insurance agreement.

Indiana Supreme Court
Jesse J. Harris, Jr. v. State of Indiana
34S02-1203-CR-169
Criminal. Clarifies a matter Harris presented in his appeal, holding that a person who claims forum-shopping has occurred in a criminal case need not establish prejudice in order to prevail on appeal. Requests the judges of Howard County to draft amendments to Local Rule 29 that clear-up ambiguous areas of the law in order to prevent future challenges.

Indiana Department of State Revenue v. AOL, LLC
49S10-1108-TA-514
Tax appeal. Reverses the tax court’s determination that AOL does not owe sales tax for promotional matters distributed in Indiana. The components acquired from vendors outside of Indiana were used to make CD-ROM packages, and AOL argued that it did not acquire the CD-ROM packages and promotional materials in any retail transactions because it merely purchased assembly and printing services. But the Supreme Court held that because the assembly houses and letter shops were selling at retail, the transactions between AOL and its assembly houses and letter shops constituted retail transactions that triggered Indiana’s use tax once AOL used the property in Indiana.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Harry Kaufmann Motorcars, Inc. v. Schumaker Performance, Inc.
41A05-1108-MI-411
Miscellaneous. Reverses ruling by Johnson Superior Judge Lance Hamner to set aside a Wisconsin court’s default judgment regarding sale of a boat. Appellate court holds that Wisconsin’s long-arm statute and caselaw dictates that the state court had personal jurisdiction on the case. Remands for further proceedings.

Indiana Farm Bureau Insurance Company as subrogee of Joseph Koors d/b/a Koors Amoco v. Harleysville Insurance Company
43A04-1109-PL-507
Civil plenary. Reverses Kosciusko Superior Judge Duane Huffer’s decision that granted summary judgment for Harleysville Insurance Company regarding insurance policy coverage pertaining to a service station environmental contamination. Holds that insurance company was not entitled to summary judgment on policy exclusion and questions about notification, and remands for further proceedings.

Jack Messer v. New Albany Police Department
22A05-1104-MI-179
Miscellaneous. Affirms judgment by Floyd Superior Judge Roger Duvall, granting summary judgment for New Albany Police Department and finding there was no issue of fact as to whether police officer Jack Messer’s racially charged remarking to other officers during roll call was considered conduct unbecoming of an officer. That comment provided an appropriate basis for his 30-day suspension. Judge John Baker dissented, finding the department did not meet its burden in proving its interests in operational efficiency outweighed Messer’s First Amendment rights.

Chad M. McLain v. State of Indiana
20A05-1109-CR-480
Criminal. Affirms trial court’s decision to allow evidence obtained in a search of McLain’s car after his initial traffic stop had been completed. Holds that because the police officer told McLain he was free to go, he was not obligated to agree to the search or answer questions, and no violation of his constitutional rights occurred.

In the Matter of the Term. of the Parent-Child Rel. and Adoption of J.P.; M.P. and Z.P.; D.P. and G.P. v. Indiana Dept. of Child Services and J.H. and T.H. (NFP)
71A03-1106-JT-248
Juvenile. Affirms probate court’s denial of paternal grandparents’ petition to adopt J.P. Dismisses without prejudice the court’s decision regarding the foster parents’ adoption petition, because it was neither a final judgment nor an appealable interlocutory order.

Lesnick Jones v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1105-CR-415
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class A felony rape, six counts Class A felony deviate conduct, Class B felony burglary, Class B felony robbery, Class B felony criminal confinement and associated charges.

Rickey Robey v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-1107-CR-433
Criminal. Affirms trial court’s denial of motion to correct erroneous sentence, holding that the motion was not the appropriate vehicle for Robey to use.

Dominee M. Florence v. Review Board of the Indiana Dept. of Workforce Development and Kindred Nursing Centers LTD PTR (NFP)
93A02-1109-EX-867
Civil. Dismisses appeal, due to Florence’s numerous and substantial violations of the Indiana Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Paul J. Kinnaman v. State of Indiana (NFP)
24A01-1105-CR-229
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class A felony dealing in methamphetamine and Class A misdemeanor possession of paraphernalia.

R.F. and I.A. v. Indiana Department of Child Services (NFP)
41A05-1107-JT-376
Juvenile. Affirms termination of parental rights for mother and father.

Andre Gonzalez v. State of Indiana (NFP)
45A03-1108-CR-369
Criminal. Reverses denial of Gonzalez’ petition to remove his sex offender designation, holding that at the time he was sentenced, Indiana law did not require lifetime registration. Remands for removal of his registration.

Rebecca A. Thieling v. State of Indiana (NFP)
45A03-1108-CR-344
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class C felony forgery and Class D felony auto theft.

Terrell Ewell v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-1107-CR-401
Criminal. Dismisses case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, concluding Ewell did not timely file his notice of appeal.

Todd Richmond v. Erin Mager (Richmond) (NFP)
64A05-1108-DR-455
Domestic relation. Affirms denial of father’s petition for change of custody and grant of mother’s petition for modification of father’s parenting time.

B.O. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
89A01-1111-JV-503
Juvenile. Affirms J.O.’s placement with the Department of Correction.

Kimberly L. Zapalac v. State of Indiana (NFP)
48A02-1107-CR-762
Criminal. Dismisses appeal for lack of jurisdiction, as Zapalac committed several crimes and made two plea agreements 12 years ago, before absconding.

Jeffrey S. Pryor v. State of Indiana (NFP)
29A02-1108-CR-740
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class C misdemeanor operating while intoxicated.

In Re: The Adoption of T.L.; M.J. v. D.F. and K.F. and Indiana Dept. of Child Services (NFP)
49A04-1108-AD-477
Adoption. Affirms trial court’s dismissal of M.J.’s petition to adopt his half-sister.

Olde York Potato Chips, Inc., ONAP, Inc., and Peter Margie v. Shenolikar Dwarka and Dwarka & Sons, Inc. (NFP)
02A05-1107-PL-375
Civil plenary. Dismisses Olde York’s appeal, holding it does not appear to be an interlocutory appeal that may be brought as of right and would be the subject of an interlocutory appeal only on certification by the trial court and acceptance by appeals court, and that there is no such certification or acceptance in the case.

Dathan Alexander v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1105-CR-465
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor possession of marijuana.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I was wondering about the 6 million put aside for common attorney fees?does that mean that if you are a plaintiff your attorney fees will be partially covered?

  2. My situation was hopeless me and my husband was on the verge of divorce. I was in a awful state and felt that I was not able to cope with life any longer. I found out about this great spell caster drlawrencespelltemple@hotmail.com and tried him. Well, he did return and now we are doing well again, more than ever before. Thank you so much Drlawrencespelltemple@hotmail.comi will forever be grateful to you Drlawrencespelltemple@hotmail.com

  3. I expressed my thought in the title, long as it was. I am shocked that there is ever immunity from accountability for ANY Government agency. That appears to violate every principle in the US Constitution, which exists to limit Government power and to ensure Government accountability. I don't know how many cases of legitimate child abuse exist, but in the few cases in which I knew the people involved, in every example an anonymous caller used DCS as their personal weapon to strike at innocent people over trivial disagreements that had no connection with any facts. Given that the system is vulnerable to abuse, and given the extreme harm any action by DCS causes to families, I would assume any degree of failure to comply with the smallest infraction of personal rights would result in mandatory review. Even one day of parent-child separation in the absence of reasonable cause for a felony arrest should result in severe penalties to those involved in the action. It appears to me, that like all bureaucracies, DCS is prone to interpret every case as legitimate. This is not an accusation against DCS. It is a statement about the nature of bureaucracies, and the need for ADDED scrutiny of all bureaucratic actions. Frankly, I question the constitutionality of bureaucracies in general, because their power is delegated, and therefore unaccountable. No Government action can be unaccountable if we want to avoid its eventual degeneration into irrelevance and lawlessness, and the law of the jungle. Our Constitution is the source of all Government power, and it is the contract that legitimizes all Government power. To the extent that its various protections against intrusion are set aside, so is the power afforded by that contract. Eventually overstepping the limits of power eliminates that power, as a law of nature. Even total tyranny eventually crumbles to nothing.

  4. Being dedicated to a genre keeps it alive until the masses catch up to the "trend." Kent and Bill are keepin' it LIVE!! Thank you gentlemen..you know your JAZZ.

  5. Hemp has very little THC which is needed to kill cancer cells! Growing cannabis plants for THC inside a hemp field will not work...where is the fear? From not really knowing about Cannabis and Hemp or just not listening to the people teaching you through testimonies and packets of info over the last few years! Wake up Hoosier law makers!

ADVERTISEMENT