The Indiana Supreme Court issued the following opinion after IL deadline on Wednesday:
Loparex, LLC v. MPI Release Technologies, LLC, Gerald Kerber, and Stephen Odders
94S00-1109-CQ-546
Certified question. Answers three questions certified from U.S. Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson in the Southern District of Indiana.
Holds that Wabash Railroad Co. v. Young, 162 Ind. 102, 69 N.E. 1003 (1904), is no longer good law because it precludes
individuals who’ve voluntarily left employment from pursuing a claim under Indiana’s Blacklisting Statute. The
justices also held that attorney fees are not an element of compensatory damages under the Blacklisting Statute and that an
employer’s suit against a former employee to protect trade secrets is not a basis for recovery under the statute.
Thursday’s opinions
7th Circuit Court of Appeals had posted no Indiana opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Supreme Court
Sheila
Perdue, et al. v. Michael A. Gargano, et al.
49S02-1107-PL-437
Civil plenary. Reverses in part Marion Superior Judge David Dreyer’s ruling on challenge to Indiana Family and Social
Services Administration’s automated system of processing claims for Medicaid, food stamps, and temporary assistance.
Holds that the FSSA’s denial notices are insufficiently explanatory but that the agency may deny an application when
that person fails to cooperate in the eligibility determination process. Affirms in part the trial court’s grant of
Sheila Perdue’s summary judgment motion on the grounds that she’s entitled to reasonable accommodations in applying
for benefits but that does not necessarily require a caseworker or case management services.
Hunt
Construction Group, Inc., and Mezzetta Construction, Inc. v. Shannon D. Garrett
49S02-1106-CT-365
Civil tort. Reverses decision by Marion Superior Judge David Shaheed in case involving the employee of a concrete subcontractor
injured in the construction of Lucas Oil Stadium. Finds construction manager did not have a legal duty by contract terms or
action, and holds that construction manager cannot be held liable for workplace negligence. Justice Brent Dickson dissents,
believing that material issues of fact exist about the construction manager’s duty of care and summary judgment is precluded
for both parties.
State
Automobile Mutual Insurance Co. v. Flexdar, Inc. and RTS Realty
49S02-1104-PL-199
Civil plenary. Affirms Marion Superior Judge Michael Keele’s judgment in favor of Flexdar, holding that the language
of a pollution exclusion in a general commercial liability policy is ambiguous and should be construed against State Automobile
Insurance Co. and in favor of coverage. Justice Steven David concurs in result, and Justice Frank Sullivan and Chief Justice
Randall Shepard dissent in a separate opinion.
Indiana Court of Appeals
New
Albany Historic Preservation Commission and City of New Albany v. Bradford Realty, Inc.
22A01-1108-PL-365
Civil plenary. Affirms and reverses in part ruling by Special Judge Daniel Moore, finding that Bradford Realty was not entitled
to actual notice of potential historic district designation and was required to obtain a certificate when it replaced the
property’s original siding. Appellate judges reverse trial court’s grant of summary judgment for Bradford Realty
and grant summary judgment to the historic preservation commission. Affirm the judge’s denial of summary judgment for
Bradford Realty on inverse condemnation claim. Judge Ezra Friedlander dissents in separate opinion.
Lawane
Chaney on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Clarian Health Partners, Inc.
49A05-0905-CV-263
Civil. Court issues rehearing on an order on a motion for appellate fees and costs, affirming its original holding but finding
that it made two errors – that the record does not support the finding that Ron Weldy informed the trial court of the
stay in his motion to compel, and that the record does not support the court’s prior statement that Weldy persisted
on the theory that Clarian Health had agreed to provide discovery after the trial court vacated its motion to compel. The
court found those errors are insignificant and do not change the outcome of the original order. The judges also denied Clarian’s
request for additional fees and costs incurred in responding to the rehearing petition.
Donald
L. Webb, III v. Sheriff Kenneth A. Murphy and Town of Brookville, Indiana; Terry Mitchum (NFP)
24A04-1104-CT-197
Civil tort. Affirms trial court’s ruling in favor of Franklin County Sheriff and Town of Brookville on claims of battery
and intentional infliction of emotional distress, finding the fundamental error doctrine does not apply and the trial court
did not abuse its discretion in exempting the defendants’ expert from a separation of witnesses order.
In
Re: The Marriage of Lisa Mae Slayback Gillispie v. Danny Lee Gillispie (NFP)
15A01-1108-DR-364
Divorce. Affirms trial court’s division of martial property.
The
Marriage of: Donald J. Shaughnessy, Jr. v. Lyn A. Shaughnessy (NFP)
06A01-1107-DR-347
Divorce. Affirms trial court’s decision to deny an order for equal division of a marital estate.
Demitrus
L. Grant v. The Bank of New York (NFP)
49A02-1104-MF-485
Mortgage foreclosure. Dismisses Demitrus Grant’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction, finding that the trial court’s
denial of motion to dismiss the complaint against Grant is not a final appealable order and Grant didn’t ask the trial
court to certify the issue for interlocutory appeal.
Kenny
Green v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1107-CR-611
Criminal. Affirms Class A felony rape and Class D felony auto theft convictions and aggregate 40-year sentence.
Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.














I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.