ILNews

Opinions March 22, 2013

March 22, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Court of Appeals
F.G. v. B.G. (NFP)
49A05-1210-DR-506
Domestic relation. Affirms trial court’s denial of father F.G.’s motion to set aside decree establishing paternity and for DNA testing regarding paternity of one of his children.

C.M. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1209-JV-757
Juvenile. Affirms finding of indirect contempt of court.

Gail Eisenhut v. Richard Eisenhut, M.D. (NFP)
49A02-1208-DR-633
Domestic relation. Reverses trial court judgment ordering Gail Eisenhut to repay Richard Eisenhut $19,250, holding there is no evidence that his overpayment of child support was anything but voluntary and gratuitous.

Lisa M. Rooker v. State of Indiana (NFP)
48A02-1206-CR-492
Criminal. Affirms three-year sentence for Class D felony conviction of operating a vehicle while intoxicated.

Roudy Joe Beasley v. State of Indiana (NFP)
84A05-1209-CR-461
Criminal. Affirms revocation of home detention.

John Mwangi v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1208-CR-647
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class D felony intimidation and theft.

Rex L. Kast v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A03-1205-CR-211
Criminal. Affirms convictions of three Class D felony counts of possession of controlled substances.

Andrew J.P. Cox v. State of Indiana (NFP)
48A05-1209-CR-451
Criminal. Affirms revocation of probation.

Thomas Albert Overton v. State of Indiana (NFP)
35A02-1206-CR-530
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class C felony child molesting.

Daimon Culpepper v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1209-CR-724
Criminal. Affirms sentence for Class A felony robbery.

Indiana Supreme Court and Indiana Tax Court issued no opinions by IL deadline. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals issued no Indiana opinions by IL deadline.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT