ILNews

Opinions March 31, 2014

March 31, 2014
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

7th Circuit Court of Appeals
USA v. Randall Causey, 13-1321
Criminal. Affirms Causey’s convictions and 108-month sentence for one count of conspiring to commit wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1349 and eight counts of aiding and abetting the commission of, and committing the offenses of, wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1343. Ruled that the District Court did not abused its discretion in admitting evidence and that the District Court erred in barring the defense witness from giving expert testimony while allowing the expert testimony by the government witness. Also finds the District Court properly applied two-level sentencing enhancement.   

Indiana Court of Appeals
Debbie Mitchell v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development, and Midwest Mobile Care, Inc.
93A02-1310-EX-856
Agency action. Affirms findings of the Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development that Mitchell was not entitled to additional unemployment benefits. Mitchell received 26 weeks of unemployment benefits but was denied an extension because she worked four to eight hours a week for another company after losing her full-time job. The Review Board did not err in applying the unambiguous statute defining partial unemployment.

Jeffrey Metzger v. State of Indiana
02A03-1307-CR-295
Criminal. Affirms conviction of indirect contempt of court based on Metzger’s actions in Allen County Jail after a blood draw had been ordered on suspicion of operating while intoxicated. When Metzger approached a deputy with a chair and refused to sit down when ordered, the act was clearly directed against the authority of the court and hindered the execution of the trial court’s warrant. The trial court properly held Metzger in contempt.

Victor W. Goodman and Jacquelyn C. Burke v. Steven L. Serine, Suzanne M. Serine, United States of America Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service, Robert J. DeGrazia, et al.
55A01-1304-PL-176
Civil plenary. Vacates summary judgment in favor of Internal Revenue Service in a dispute over a land contract sale for a property in which income tax liens were attached, and remands to the trial court to dismiss Goodman’s complaint for quiet title. Because the property was part of the SeRines’ bankruptcy estate, proper venue for the dispute is the bankruptcy court, even though the bankruptcy case was dismissed.

Dontae M. Clark v. State of Indiana
27A04-1306-CR-269
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class D felony possession of marijuana, casting aside arguments of fundamental error and Fourth Amendment challenges to seizure and admittance of evidence that was not analyzed by the State Police lab, apparently because the sample was too small. Evidence to convict was sufficient, Judge Cale Bradford wrote. Judge Paul Mathias, in a concurring opinion, wrote that the panel didn’t need to consider Clark’s argument on admitting evidence because it wasn’t preserved for appeal. Judge Rudy R. Pyle III concurred separately, writing to submit the State Police lab policy concerning a minimum quantity for testing be reconsidered.

Dustin Lee Jarrell v. Billie Jo Jarrell
42A01-1308-DR-381
Domestic. Affirms trial court grant of modification of custody order awarding mother sole physical custody of the couple’s child. The court correctly ruled that father acquiesced to mother’s relocation because he waited two years after mother moved 180 miles away to file a motion for custody modification. There is a sufficient change in circumstances to support the custody modification, and the appeals panel declined to reweigh the evidence regarding best interests of the child.

Derrick R. Woods v. State of Indiana (NFP)
45A05-1307-CR-379
Criminal. Affirms conviction of failure to return to lawful detention, a Class D felony.

Michael Kimes v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-1309-CR-440
Criminal. Affirms 30-year sentence, with six years suspended, for conviction of child molesting, as a Class A felony.

Davonta K. Johnson v. State of Indiana (NFP)
20A03-1307-CR-294
Criminal. Affirms 19-year sentence for convictions of one count of burglary and one count of robbery, both as a Class B felonies.

Trenton Bolden v. State of Indiana (NFP)
15A01-1310-CR-469
Criminal. Affirms the revocation of Bolden’s probation.

Charles Gooch v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1309-PC-781
Post conviction. Affirms denial of Gooch’s petition for post-conviction relief.

Lila Marquez v. Rene Kobler (NFP)

49A02-1306-CT-486
Civil tort. Affirms judgment that Marquez was 100 percent at fault for the accident and that there was no issue for the jury to decide with regard to liability.  

Jewel L. and John E. Johnson v. Brooks Striping, Inc., Inland Western Greensburg Commons LLC, and Inland US Management LLC (NFP)
16A01-1311-CT-476
Civil tort. Affirms summary judgment in favor of Brooks Striping, Inc., Inland Western Greensburg Commons, LLC, and Inland US Management LLC.

Jerry D. White v. State of Indiana (NFP)
20A03-1306-PC-238
Criminal. Affirms denial of White’s petition for post-conviction relief.  

Aadil Ashfaque v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1308-CR-743
Criminal. Dismisses appeal of trial court’s denial of Ashfaque’s motion to dismiss charges of dealing in a synthetic drug, as a Class D felony; possession of a synthetic drug, as a Class D felony; operating while intoxicated, as a Class A misdemeanor; and operating without a license, as a Class C misdemeanor.

In re the Marriage of: Tasha Bates v. Damon Bates (NFP)
49A02-1306-DR-572
Domestic relation. Affirms denial of mother’s request for an emergency continuance of the final hearing, denial of mother’s post-trial motion to supplement the record with evidence. Also affirms division of martial estate and order that mother pay $10,000 of father’s attorney fees. Remands for the recalculation of child support to include father’s income from inheritance.

Samuel Lewis v. State of Indiana (NFP)
20A03-1309-PC-348
Post conviction. Affirms denial of Lewis’ petition for post-conviction relief.

Tony Dale Wilson v. State of Indiana (NFP)
05A04-1307-CR-369
Criminal. Affirms conviction of child molesting, as a Class C felony, and eight-year sentence, with six years executed and two years suspended to probation.

Terelle Young v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1308-CR-712
Criminal. Affirms conviction of failure to stop after an accident resulting in personal injury, a Class A misdemeanor.

Dezmont Hogan v. State of Indiana (NFP)
82A01-1310-CR-475
Criminal. Affirms 40-year sentence for convictions of burglary, as a Class A felony; criminal confinement, as a Class B felony; and theft, as a Class D felony.

Ronnie Ervin Major v. State of Indiana (NFP)
45A03-1307-PC-288
Post conviction. Affirms denial of Major’s petition for post-conviction relief.

Zack Hitchings v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1303-CR-207
Criminal. Affirms eight-year sentence for conviction of robbery, as a Class C felony.

James Edwin Gardner, III v. State of Indiana (NFP)
45A03-1307-CR-259
Criminal. Affirms conviction of arson, a Class B felony.

Robert Whipple v. State of Indiana (NFP)
48A02-1306-CR-537
Criminal. Affirms convictions of two counts child molesting, as Class A felonies, and one count child molesting, as Class C felony.

Michael J. Bermes v. G.K. Cambray & Company, Inc., Gregory K. Cambray d/b/a Cambray & Associates, Inc., and Lauri Massoth (NFP)
35A02-1308-PL-694
Civil plenary. Affirms trial court’s judgment in favor of G.K. Cambray & Co., Inc., Gregory K. Cambray d/b/a Cambray & Associates, Inc., and Lauri Massoth. Finds the trial court did not err in determining that G.K. Cambray held a valid mechanic’s lien against Bermes’ real property and that G.K. Cambray did not commit a deceptive act by failing to comply with the Indiana Home Improvement Contracts Act. Also rules Bermes is not entitled to hold Massoth personally liable.

Tyrone Ice v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-1305-CR-254
Criminal. Affirms convictions for attempted rape and two counts of criminal deviate conduct, all Class B felonies.

Louis P. Fromer v. State of Indiana (NFP)
79A04-1306-CR-272
Criminal. Affirms conviction and 45-year sentence for dealing in a schedule II controlled substance, a Class A felony. However, rules the trial court erred when it entered a separate consecutive five-year sentence based upon the habitual substance offender finding. Remands to trial court with instructions to correct its sentencing order to reflect an enhancement of Fromer’s dealing conviction by five years rather than as a separate sentence. Judge John Baker wrote a separate opinion concurring in part and in result.

Kevin J. Mamon v. State of Indiana (NFP)
30A05-1309-CR-440
Criminal. Affirms conviction and three-year sentence for committing battery by body waste, a Class D felony.

Andrew Lee Barnett v. State of Indiana (NFP)
82A04-1309-CR-444
Criminal. Affirms convictions for attempted armed robbery, a Class B felony; attempted burglary, a Class B felony; intimidation, a Class C felony; carrying a handgun without a license, a Class A misdemeanor; and resisting law enforcement, a Class A misdemeanor.

Kenneth E. Eltzroth v. State of Indiana (NFP)
85A02-1306-CR-571
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class B felony dealing in controlled substance.

Regina Choice v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A03-1306-CR-266
Criminal. Affirms two-year sentence for theft as a Class D felony.

James Lohman III v. State of Indiana (NFP)
64A03-1307-CR-258
Criminal. Affirms aggregate 21-year sentence for pleading guilty to Class B felony leaving the scene of an accident causing death and Class C felony operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated causing death.

In the Matter of the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of M.F., C.F. v. Indiana Department of Child Services (NFP)
40A01-1309-JT-392
Juvenile. Affirms termination of C.F’s (mother) parental rights over her minor daughter, M.F.

Indiana Supreme Court and the Indiana Tax Court did not post any opinions by IL deadline. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals did not post any Indiana opinions Monday by IL deadline.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I have been on this program while on parole from 2011-2013. No person should be forced mentally to share private details of their personal life with total strangers. Also giving permission for a mental therapist to report to your parole agent that your not participating in group therapy because you don't have the financial mean to be in the group therapy. I was personally singled out and sent back three times for not having money and also sent back within the six month when you aren't to be sent according to state law. I will work to het this INSOMM's removed from this state. I also had twelve or thirteen parole agents with a fifteen month period. Thanks for your time.

  2. Our nation produces very few jurists of the caliber of Justice DOUGLAS and his peers these days. Here is that great civil libertarian, who recognized government as both a blessing and, when corrupted by ideological interests, a curse: "Once the investigator has only the conscience of government as a guide, the conscience can become ‘ravenous,’ as Cromwell, bent on destroying Thomas More, said in Bolt, A Man For All Seasons (1960), p. 120. The First Amendment mirrors many episodes where men, harried and harassed by government, sought refuge in their conscience, as these lines of Thomas More show: ‘MORE: And when we stand before God, and you are sent to Paradise for doing according to your conscience, *575 and I am damned for not doing according to mine, will you come with me, for fellowship? ‘CRANMER: So those of us whose names are there are damned, Sir Thomas? ‘MORE: I don't know, Your Grace. I have no window to look into another man's conscience. I condemn no one. ‘CRANMER: Then the matter is capable of question? ‘MORE: Certainly. ‘CRANMER: But that you owe obedience to your King is not capable of question. So weigh a doubt against a certainty—and sign. ‘MORE: Some men think the Earth is round, others think it flat; it is a matter capable of question. But if it is flat, will the King's command make it round? And if it is round, will the King's command flatten it? No, I will not sign.’ Id., pp. 132—133. DOUGLAS THEN WROTE: Where government is the Big Brother,11 privacy gives way to surveillance. **909 But our commitment is otherwise. *576 By the First Amendment we have staked our security on freedom to promote a multiplicity of ideas, to associate at will with kindred spirits, and to defy governmental intrusion into these precincts" Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Comm., 372 U.S. 539, 574-76, 83 S. Ct. 889, 908-09, 9 L. Ed. 2d 929 (1963) Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring. I write: Happy Memorial Day to all -- God please bless our fallen who lived and died to preserve constitutional governance in our wonderful series of Republics. And God open the eyes of those government officials who denounce the constitutions of these Republics by arbitrary actions arising out capricious motives.

  3. From back in the day before secularism got a stranglehold on Hoosier jurists comes this great excerpt via Indiana federal court judge Allan Sharp, dedicated to those many Indiana government attorneys (with whom I have dealt) who count the law as a mere tool, an optional tool that is not to be used when political correctness compels a more acceptable result than merely following the path that the law directs: ALLEN SHARP, District Judge. I. In a scene following a visit by Henry VIII to the home of Sir Thomas More, playwriter Robert Bolt puts the following words into the mouths of his characters: Margaret: Father, that man's bad. MORE: There is no law against that. ROPER: There is! God's law! MORE: Then God can arrest him. ROPER: Sophistication upon sophistication! MORE: No, sheer simplicity. The law, Roper, the law. I know what's legal not what's right. And I'll stick to what's legal. ROPER: Then you set man's law above God's! MORE: No, far below; but let me draw your attention to a fact I'm not God. The currents and eddies of right and wrong, which you find such plain sailing, I can't navigate. I'm no voyager. But in the thickets of law, oh, there I'm a forester. I doubt if there's a man alive who could follow me there, thank God... ALICE: (Exasperated, pointing after Rich) While you talk, he's gone! MORE: And go he should, if he was the Devil himself, until he broke the law! ROPER: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law! MORE: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? ROPER: I'd cut down every law in England to do that! MORE: (Roused and excited) Oh? (Advances on Roper) And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you where would you hide, Roper, the laws being flat? (He leaves *1257 him) This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast man's laws, not God's and if you cut them down and you're just the man to do it d'you really think you would stand upright in the winds that would blow then? (Quietly) Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake. ROPER: I have long suspected this; this is the golden calf; the law's your god. MORE: (Wearily) Oh, Roper, you're a fool, God's my god... (Rather bitterly) But I find him rather too (Very bitterly) subtle... I don't know where he is nor what he wants. ROPER: My God wants service, to the end and unremitting; nothing else! MORE: (Dryly) Are you sure that's God! He sounds like Moloch. But indeed it may be God And whoever hunts for me, Roper, God or Devil, will find me hiding in the thickets of the law! And I'll hide my daughter with me! Not hoist her up the mainmast of your seagoing principles! They put about too nimbly! (Exit More. They all look after him). Pgs. 65-67, A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS A Play in Two Acts, Robert Bolt, Random House, New York, 1960. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, Indianapolis, for defendants. Childs v. Duckworth, 509 F. Supp. 1254, 1256 (N.D. Ind. 1981) aff'd, 705 F.2d 915 (7th Cir. 1983)

  4. "Meanwhile small- and mid-size firms are getting squeezed and likely will not survive unless they become a boutique firm." I've been a business attorney in small, and now mid-size firm for over 30 years, and for over 30 years legal consultants have been preaching this exact same mantra of impending doom for small and mid-sized firms -- verbatim. This claim apparently helps them gin up merger opportunities from smaller firms who become convinced that they need to become larger overnight. The claim that large corporations are interested in cost-saving and efficiency has likewise been preached for decades, and is likewise bunk. If large corporations had any real interest in saving money they wouldn't use large law firms whose rates are substantially higher than those of high-quality mid-sized firms.

  5. The family is the foundation of all human government. That is the Grand Design. Modern governments throw off this Design and make bureaucratic war against the family, as does Hollywood and cultural elitists such as third wave feminists. Since WWII we have been on a ship of fools that way, with both the elite and government and their social engineering hacks relentlessly attacking the very foundation of social order. And their success? See it in the streets of Fergusson, on the food stamp doles (mostly broken families)and in the above article. Reject the Grand Design for true social function, enter the Glorious State to manage social dysfunction. Our Brave New World will be a prison camp, and we will welcome it as the only way to manage given the anarchy without it.

ADVERTISEMENT