ILNews

Opinions May 13, 2011

May 13, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Melody D. Linenburg v. Mark A. Linenburg
82A01-1011-DR-625
Domestic relation. Affirms provisional order awarding father primary physical custody of the children and possession of the marital residence during the pendency of the dissolution proceeding. The mother failed to establish an abuse of discretion and the court declines to reweigh the evidence.

Raymond Shook v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1007-PC-461
Post conviction. Affirms denial of motion to remove Shook’s status as a sexually violent predator.

Julio Azpeitia v. State of Indiana (NFP)

09A05-1012-CR-796
Criminal. Affirms convictions of and sentence for Class A misdemeanor driving while suspended and Class B misdemeanor public intoxication.

Michael Yang v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-1006-CR-351
Criminal. Affirms convictions of and sentence for felony murder and Class A misdemeanor invasion of privacy.

Steven Foernzler v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1007-CR-827
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class A felony attempted murder and Class D felony residential entry.

Reginald N. Person, Jr., et al. v. Carol A. Shipley (NFP)
20A03-1008-CT-463
Civil tort. Reverses jury verdict in favor of Shipley and remands for further proceedings.

Michael Hale v. State of Indiana (NFP)
43A05-1010-PC-697
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.

Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Is it possible to amend an order for child support due to false paternity?

  2. He did not have an "unlicensed handgun" in his pocket. Firearms are not licensed in Indiana. He apparently possessed a handgun without a license to carry, but it's not the handgun that is licensed (or registered).

  3. Once again, Indiana's legislature proves how friendly it is to monopolies. This latest bill by Hershman demonstrates the lengths Indiana's representatives are willing to go to put big business's (especially utilities') interests above those of everyday working people. Maassal argues that if the technology (solar) is so good, it will be able to compete on its own. Too bad he doesn't feel the same way about the industries he represents. Instead, he wants to cut the small credit consumers get for using solar in order to "add a 'level of certainty'" to his industry. I haven't heard of or seen such a blatant money-grab by an industry since the days when our federal, state, and local governments were run by the railroad. Senator Hershman's constituents should remember this bill the next time he runs for office, and they should penalize him accordingly.

  4. From his recent appearance on WRTV to this story here, Frank is everywhere. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy, although he should stop using Eric Schnauffer for his 7th Circuit briefs. They're not THAT hard.

  5. They learn our language prior to coming here. My grandparents who came over on the boat, had to learn English and become familiarize with Americas customs and culture. They are in our land now, speak ENGLISH!!

ADVERTISEMENT