ILNews

Opinions May 14, 2012

May 14, 2012
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

7th Circuit Court of Appeals posted no Indiana opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Supreme Court and Indiana Tax Court posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Dana L. Lewis, Jr. v. State of Indiana
40A01-1106-CR-276
Criminal. Reverses denial of Lewis’ motion to suppress statements he made during a police interview regarding an alleged sex crime. Lewis’ question, “Can I get a lawyer?” constituted an unequivocal invocation of his Fifth Amendment right to counsel.

In the Matter of the Term. of the Parent-Child Rel. of F.R. and Z.R.; and P.R. v. The Indiana Dept. of Child Services and Child Advocates, Inc. (NFP)
49A02-1110-JT-1007
Juvenile. Affirms involuntary termination of parental rights.

In Re the Marriage of R.B. and K.S. (NFP)
32A01-1109-DR-394
Domestic relation. Affirms in part and reverses in part the order denying mother R.B.’s petition for child support arrearage and for educational custody of child. Remands for further proceedings.

Vinod C. Gupta v. City of Terre Haute, Department of Redevelopment (NFP)
84A04-1110-MI-520
Miscellaneous. Reverses judgment in favor of the city of Terre Haute Department of Redevelopment regarding a record of nonpayment against Gupta.

A.F. v. J.F. (NFP)
29A02-1101-DR-59
Domestic relation. Affirms denial of motion to correct error, which challenged a child support order and property division in a marriage dissolution.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. A sad end to a prolific gadfly. Indiana has suffered a great loss in the journalistic realm.

  2. Good riddance to this dangerous activist judge

  3. What is the one thing the Hoosier legal status quo hates more than a whistleblower? A lawyer whistleblower taking on the system man to man. That must never be rewarded, must always, always, always be punished, lest the whole rotten tree be felled.

  4. I want to post this to keep this tread alive and hope more of David's former clients might come forward. In my case, this coward of a man represented me from June 2014 for a couple of months before I fired him. I knew something was wrong when he blatantly lied about what he had advised me in my contentious and unfortunate divorce trial. His impact on the proceedings cast a very long shadow and continues to impact me after a lengthy 19 month divorce. I would join a class action suit.

  5. The dispute in LB Indiana regarding lake front property rights is typical of most beach communities along our Great Lakes. Simply put, communication to non owners when visiting the lakefront would be beneficial. The Great Lakes are designated navigational waters (including shorelines). The high-water mark signifies the area one is able to navigate. This means you can walk, run, skip, etc. along the shores. You can't however loiter, camp, sunbath in front of someones property. Informational signs may be helpful to owners and visitors. Our Great Lakes are a treasure that should be enjoyed by all. PS We should all be concerned that the Long Beach, Indiana community is on septic systems.

ADVERTISEMENT