Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Michael J. Shepard v. State of Indiana (NFP)
82A05-1002-CR-94
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class D felony resisting law enforcement and Class C misdemeanor operating a vehicle with
an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more.
Phillip Ibrahim v. Automotive Finance Corp. (NFP)
49A02-1002-CC-99
Civil collection. Affirms summary judgment in favor of Automotive Finance Corporation on its complaint for breach of contract,
breach of guaranty, fraud, and check deception.
Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of D.M., et al.; H.M. and D.M. v. I.D.C.S. (NFP)
20A04-1003-JT-204
Juvenile. Affirms involuntary termination of parental rights.
R.E. v. B.L. (NFP)
02A03-1002-DR-111
Domestic relation. Affirms order granting maternal aunt B.L.’s petition for custody of R.E.’s daughter.
Jane Lareau v. Ernest Lareau (NFP)
79A05-1002-DR-117
Domestic relation. Affirms orders deciding issues that arose after dissolution of marriage.
Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
ILNews
Sponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!
So, if I save $100.00 cash per week, from my $500.00 per week paycheck, for 50 years, at which time, I will have saved $260,000.00, the government can raid my home and take my money, just by saying it is drug money! Shouldn't the government, have some kind of evidence of drugs, rather, than just saying we are the government and we will take anything you own, anytime we choose? Tyranny is upon us! If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!