ILNews

Opinions Nov. 14, 2011

November 14, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

7th Circuit Court of Appeals had posted no Indiana opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals

D.E. v. State of Indiana
49A02-1103-JV-319
Juvenile. Affirms adjudication as a delinquent through D.E.’s plea agreement. D.E. didn’t demonstrate that the waivers in the plea agreement didn’t comport with Ind. Code 31-32-5-1. Placement of D.E. in a juvenile correction facility was not an abuse of discretion.

Clarence Oatts v. Ferguson-Watkins & Associates (NFP)
49A05-1009-CT-581
Civil tort. Affirms summary judgment in favor of Oatts’ former attorney on Oatts’ suit claiming the attorney didn’t provide him a copy of expenditures for work performed and hadn’t returned money paid to hire an expert.

Richard S. Samuels v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1101-PC-123
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.

Michelle Lynch v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-1103-CR-85
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor criminal mischief.

Charles Mullen v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1012-PC-1415
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.

A.H. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1104-JV-210
Juvenile. Affirms adjudications as a delinquent for what would be Class C felony burglary and Class D felony theft if committed by an adult.

James A. Smith v. State of Indiana (NFP)
40A01-1103-CR-122
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to attempted murder and kidnapping as Class A felonies and two counts of Class C felony battery.

Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Can I get this form on line,if not where can I obtain one. I am eligible.

  2. What a fine example of the best of the Hoosier tradition! How sad that the AP has to include partisan snark in the obit for this great American patriot and adventurer.

  3. Why are all these lawyers yakking to the media about pending matters? Trial by media? What the devil happened to not making extrajudicial statements? The system is falling apart.

  4. It is a sad story indeed as this couple has been only in survival mode, NOT found guilty with Ponzi, shaken down for 5 years and pursued by prosecution that has been ignited by a civil suit with very deep pockets wrenched in their bitterness...It has been said that many of us are breaking an average of 300 federal laws a day without even knowing it. Structuring laws, & civilForfeiture laws are among the scariest that need to be restructured or repealed . These laws were initially created for drug Lords and laundering money and now reach over that line. Here you have a couple that took out their own money, not drug money, not laundering. Yes...Many upset that they lost money...but how much did they make before it all fell apart? No one ask that question? A civil suit against Williams was awarded because he has no more money to fight...they pushed for a break in order...they took all his belongings...even underwear, shoes and clothes? who does that? What allows that? Maybe if you had the picture of him purchasing a jacket at the Goodwill just to go to court the next day...his enemy may be satisfied? But not likely...bitterness is a master. For happy ending lovers, you will be happy to know they have a faith that has changed their world and a solid love that many of us can only dream about. They will spend their time in federal jail for taking their money from their account, but at the end of the day they have loyal friends, a true love and a hope of a new life in time...and none of that can be bought or taken That is the real story.

  5. Could be his email did something especially heinous, really over the top like questioning Ind S.Ct. officials or accusing JLAP of being the political correctness police.

ADVERTISEMENT