7th Circuit Court of Appeals had posted no Indiana opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
D.E. v. State of Indiana
49A02-1103-JV-319
Juvenile. Affirms adjudication as a delinquent through D.E.’s plea agreement. D.E. didn’t demonstrate that the
waivers in the plea agreement didn’t comport with Ind. Code 31-32-5-1. Placement of D.E. in a juvenile correction facility
was not an abuse of discretion.
Clarence Oatts v. Ferguson-Watkins & Associates (NFP)
49A05-1009-CT-581
Civil tort. Affirms summary judgment in favor of Oatts’ former attorney on Oatts’ suit claiming the attorney
didn’t provide him a copy of expenditures for work performed and hadn’t returned money paid to hire an expert.
Richard S. Samuels v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1101-PC-123
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.
Michelle Lynch v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-1103-CR-85
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor criminal mischief.
Charles Mullen v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1012-PC-1415
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.
A.H. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1104-JV-210
Juvenile. Affirms adjudications as a delinquent for what would be Class C felony burglary and Class D felony theft if committed
by an adult.
James A. Smith v. State of Indiana (NFP)
40A01-1103-CR-122
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to attempted murder and kidnapping as Class A felonies and two counts of
Class C felony battery.
Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.