Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
S.A. v. Review Board
93A02-1004-EX-568
Civil. Affirms the Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development’s ruling that S.A.’s acceptance
of an early retirement package made her ineligible to continue receiving unemployment benefits. S.A. left employment without
good cause in connection with the work.
Deana Crickmore v. John R. Crickmore (NFP)
49A04-1003-DR-184
Domestic relation. Affirms finding John’s overpayments of spousal maintenance were involuntary and the order Deana
repay him accordingly. Reverses amount of judgment as to the dollar amount and affirms in all other respects. Remands for
further proceedings.
Robin L. Rashin v. Mark W. Rashin (NFP)
45A04-0911-CV-660
Civil. Reverses denial of rehabilitative maintenance to Robin and remands with instructions to calculate an award of rehabilitative
maintenance, to exclude the settlement proceeds from the marital estate, and to recalculate the division of marital property
accordingly. Remands the issue of whether Robin shall be awarded appellate attorney fees. Affirms judgment in all other respects.
Jeanette Daniels, et al. v. Hidden Bay Homeowners Association, Inc., et al. (NFP)
49A02-1003-PL-279
Civil plenary. Affirms summary judgment for all of the defendants in Daniels and Russell’s suit to recover damage to
a condominium and personal property after a fire.
In the Guardianship of Z.E. and A.W.; Ala.G., et al. v. Alk.G., et al. (NFP)
45A05-1004-GU-255
Guardianship. Affirms juvenile court has subject matter jurisdiction over the grandparents’ custody action as it relates
to one of the children and remands for a determination of whether the court has subject matter as it relates to the other
child. Affirms order finding the mother is the custodian of the children unless another court has ruled otherwise and by appointment
a guardian ad litem and directing the grandparents to pay a portion of the guardian ad litem’s fees relating to Z.E.
Reverses order appointing GAL and requiring grandparents to pay GAL fees for matters relating to A.W. only if the court is
found to lack jurisdiction over the custody of A.W. on remand.
Antonio M. Sanders v. State of Indiana (NFP)
22A01-1005-CR-234
Criminal. Affirms denial of motion to withdraw guilty plea.
Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.














Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...
Yikes!