7th Circuit Court of Appeals had posted no Indiana opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
In Re: The Paternity of M.F.; N.F. v. J.T.
10A01-1101-JP-15
Juvenile. Reverses portion of the order finding mother N.F. in contempt because she presented a prima facie case that the
trial court abused its discretion. Reverses order that mother pay attorney fees based on the contempt finding. Affirms portion
of the order that requires N.F. buy a plane ticket for M.F. to visit her father in Florida. Judge Kirsch dissents without
opinion.
Timothy Southward v. State of Indiana
49A05-1103-CR-106
Criminal. Affirms conviction of and sentence for possessing material capable of causing bodily injury while incarcerated
as a Class C felon. Although the trial court abused its discretion in admitting the Evidence Rule 404(b) evidence based on
the intent exception, it does not rise to the level of fundamental error. Finds sufficient evidence to support the conviction
and his sentence is not inappropriate.
Roy Hersley v. State of Indiana (NFP)
16A01-1105-CR-210
Criminal. Affirms convictions of and sentence for Class C felony dealing in marijuana, Class D felony theft and two adjudications
as a habitual offender.
Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.














I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.