ILNews

Opinions Oct. 12, 2012

October 12, 2012
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

7th Circuit Court of Appeals issued no opinions prior to IL deadline.

Indiana Supreme Court and Indiana Tax court issued no opinions prior to IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Jeffrey Riggs and Mark Ashmann v. Mark S. Weinberger, M.D., Mark Weinberger, M.D., P.C., Merrillville Center for Advanced Surgery, LLC, and Nose and Sinus Center, LLC
45A03-1109-CT-394
Civil tort. Reaffirms original opinion in all respects, and finds that a trial court when confronted with the facts and circumstances like those in this case, may compel an involuntary psychiatric examination in accordance with Ind. Trial Rule 35. There is no requirement that the court must do so.

Certain Westfield Southeast Area 1 Annexation Territory Landowners and Certain Westfield Southeast Area 2 Territory Landowners v. City of Westfield
29A02-1205-MI-389
Miscellaneous. Affirms judgment in favor of Westfield in finding that the city’s delayed publication of annexation ordinances did not bar annexation. The remonstrators haven’t shown a violation of their substantial rights. Affirms that the remonstrators do have standing to challenge the city’s annexation as evidenced by the certification of the remonstrance petition prior to the evidentiary hearing.

Charles Davis, Sr. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
03A05-1111-CR-639
Criminal. Affirms conviction and sentence for Class B felony dealing in methamphetamine.

Steven Powers v. State of Indiana (NFP)
84A01-1201-CR-29
Criminal. Affirms sentence for Class B felony neglect of a dependent resulting in serious bodily injury.

T.H. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
53A05-1203-JV-119
Juvenile. Affirms adjudication as a delinquent, finding T.H. committed rape and criminal deviate conduct.

Robert Decker v. Paul Whitesell, as Superintendent of the Indiana State Police, The Indiana State Police Board, and The Indiana State Police (NFP)
84A01-1112-PL-578
Civil plenary. Affirms termination of employment.

Robin McFarland v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1203-CR-239
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class D felony theft.

Lawrence A. Smith v. Dennis A. Williams and Giddings, Whitsitt & Williams, P.C. (NFP)
06A01-1201-CT-20
Civil tort. Affirms order granting summary judgment in favor of Williams and the law firm on Smith’s legal malpractice action.

Jwaun Poindexter v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1203-CR-213
Criminal. Affirms murder conviction, reverses conviction of Class A felony attempted robbery and remands with instructions to enter judgment of conviction for attempted robbery as a Class C felony and sentence Poindexter accordingly.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
2015 Distinguished Barrister &
Up and Coming Lawyer Reception

Tuesday, May 5, 2015 • 4:30 - 7:00 pm
Learn More


ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Uh oh, someone is really going to get their panti ... uh, um ... I mean get upset now: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/mar/31/arkansas-passes-indiana-style-religious-freedom-bill

  2. Bryan, stop insulting the Swedes by comparing them to the American oligarchs. Otherwise your point is well taken.

  3. Sociologist of religion Peter Berger once said that the US is a “nation of Indians ruled by Swedes.” He meant an irreligious elite ruling a religious people, as that Sweden is the world’s least religious country and India the most religious. The idea is that American social elites tend to be much less religious than just about everyone else in the country. If this is true, it helps explain the controversy raking Indiana over Hollywood, San Fran, NYC, academia and downtown Indy hot coals. Nevermind logic, nevermind it is just the 1993 fed bill did, forget the Founders, abandon of historic dedication to religious liberty. The Swedes rule. You cannot argue with elitists. They have the power, they will use the power, sit down and shut up or feel the power. I know firsthand, having been dealt blows from the elite's high and mighty hands often as a mere religious plebe.

  4. I need helping gaining custody of my 5 and 1 year old from my alcoholic girlfriend. This should be an easy case for any lawyer to win... I've just never had the courage to take her that far. She has a record of public intox and other things. She has no job and no where to live othe than with me. But after 5 years of trying to help her with her bad habit, she has put our kids in danger by driving after drinking with them... She got detained yesterday and the police chief released my kids to me from the police station. I live paycheck to paycheck and Im under alot of stress dealing with this situation. Can anyone please help?

  5. The more a state tries to force people to associate, who don't like each other and simply want to lead separate lives, the more that state invalidates itself....... This conflict has shown clearly that the advocates of "tolerance" are themselves intolerant, the advocates of "diversity" intend to inflict themselves on an unwilling majority by force if necessary, until that people complies and relents and allows itself to be made homogenous with the politically correct preferences of the diversity-lobbies. Let's clearly understand, this is force versus force and democracy has nothing to do with this. Democracy is a false god in the first place, even if it is a valid ideal for politics, but it is becoming ever more just an empty slogan that just suckers a bunch of cattle into paying their taxes and volunteering for stupid wars.

ADVERTISEMENT