The following are not-for-publication opinions released by IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Betty J. Angel v. Kent H. Powelson and Marjorie A. Powelson
82A04-1205-PL-292
Civil plenary. Affirms order granting part of the Powelsons’ summary judgment motion on Angel’s claims of reformation
of a deed and adverse possession. The undisputed evidence shows that both Angel and the Powelsons were granted an easement
to use the roadway and both used it for ingress and egress purposes. The evidence also supports Angel’s claim for reformation
of a deed is barred by laches.
Shiloh Jones v. State of Indiana
49A04-1202-CR-74
Criminal. Vacates the convictions and sentences for Class A misdemeanors battery and domestic battery due to double jeopardy
and affirms conviction and sentence for Class D felony domestic battery. Jones’ conviction for criminal confinement
did not violate the prohibition against double jeopardy. The amended sentence imposed by the judge and comments by the prosecutor
did not constitute fundamental error.
Aaron Shelton v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A05-1112-CR-665
Criminal. Affirms convictions of one count of possession of methamphetamine and two counts of possession of a controlled
substance, all Class D felonies.
Cheryl E. Webb f/k/a Cheryl E. Wilder and G. Cameron Taylor v. The Bank of New York Mellon (NFP)
49A02-1112-MF-1142
Mortgage foreclosure. Affirms order denying Wilder’s and Taylor’s motion for summary judgment and the grant of
summary judgment in favor of the bank. Remands with instructions that the trial court recalculate the amount to award to the
bank consistent with this opinion. Chief Judge Margret Robb dissents.














Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!
So, if I save $100.00 cash per week, from my $500.00 per week paycheck, for 50 years, at which time, I will have saved $260,000.00, the government can raid my home and take my money, just by saying it is drug money! Shouldn't the government, have some kind of evidence of drugs, rather, than just saying we are the government and we will take anything you own, anytime we choose? Tyranny is upon us! If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!