Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Dorris Merriweather III v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A04-0912-CR-691
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A felony child molesting and Class C felony child molesting.
Louis Jenkins v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1003-CR-253
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class C felony child molesting.
Jamie Lee Benton v. State of Indiana (NFP)
65A05-1002-CR-126
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class B felony burglary.
Allen Elston v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1003-CR-137
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class D felony theft.
L. Steven Beckham, Jacquelyn K. Beckham, and Amos Agri Products, Inc. v. Lafayette Bank and Trust
Company (NFP)
79A05-0909-CV-554
Civil. Affirms judgment in favor of Lafayette Bank and Trust following a bench trial on the bank’s complaint seeking
to foreclose on certain real property.
Steven Pritt v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-0909-CR-554
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class A felony child molesting and reverses one conviction of Class C felony child molesting.
Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
ILNews
Sponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.