7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Joseph
Finch, David E. Hensley, and Peter W. Mungovan v. Bart Peterson, individually and in his official capacity, et al.
09-2676
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch.
Civil. Affirms denial of the city officials’ motion for judgment on the pleadings in a suit filed by three white officers
alleging discrimination in promotions. The 1978 consent decree between the Indianapolis Police Department and the U.S. Department
of Justice does not operate to confer qualified immunity on city officials who were involved in making the challenged promotions.
Nothing in the decree required them to take race into consideration when making promotions.
Indiana Supreme Court
Lyn
Leone, et al. v. Commissioner, BMV
49S02-0910-CV-505
Civil. Affirms denial of preliminary injunction sought by the plaintiffs to prevent the BMV from revoking driver’s
licenses when the names from BMV and Social Security Administration records do not match. The class hasn’t shown a likelihood
of success. Dissolves the preliminary injunction entered by the Indiana Court of Appeals as a stay pending appeal.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Charles
Adam Trotter v. State of Indiana
29A02-0910-CR-974
Criminal. Reverses denial of motion to suppress and the grant of the state’s motion to clarify. The trial court ruled
that although the warrantless entry into the residence was unconstitutional, the suppression of the evidence wasn’t
necessary based upon the doctrine of attenuation. The warrantless entry violated both federal and state constitutions. The
proper remedy for the constitutional violation is the suppression of evidence. Remands for further proceedings.
Crown
Coin Meter Company, et al. v. Park P, LLC
34A02-1002-PL-185
Civil plenary. Reverses summary judgment in favor of Park P in its complaint to quiet title and seeking a declaratory judgment
that the lease between Crown Coin and the prior owner of the apartment building is void as to Park P. There is a genuine issue
of material fact as to whether Park P had actual implied notice of Crown Coin’s outstanding rights at the time Park
P purchased the property and whether Park P was a bona fide purchaser. Remands for further proceedings.
Eclipse
Consulting, Inc. v. Community Bank (NFP)
29A05-0912-CV-696
Civil. Affirms grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Community Bank in Eclipse’s suit alleging breach of contract,
fraud, conversion and bad faith. Remands for proceedings.
David
L. Howard v. State of Indiana (NFP)
46A03-0907-CR-299
Criminal. Affirms conviction of and 65-year sentence with five years suspended to probation for murder.
Jeanette
Haggard v. Brent Boyd (NFP)
32A04-1001-DR-33
Domestic relation. Affirms granting the dependent tax exemption to Boyd. Reverses calculation of the amount of child support
Boyd has overpaid since he filed his petition to modify and remands with instructions to amend its order on father’s
petition to modify custody and support accordingly.
D.L.S.
v. J.S. (NFP)
85A02-0910-CV-985
Civil. Affirms order granting physical custody of D.S.’s children to mother J.S.
Edna
Taylor Living Trust v. Kokomo/Howard County Plan Comm. (NFP)
80A05-1004-PL-289
Civil plenary. Affirms summary judgment in favor of the commission on the Taylor Trust’s complaint for mandate.
Chance
Ross Carper v. State of Indiana (NFP)
48A05-1002-CR-96
Criminal. Affirms revocation of probation.
Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.














vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.