ILNews

Opinions Sept. 14, 2010

September 14, 2010
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Supreme Court had posted not opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Gerald L. Wilkerson v. State of Indiana
26A01-0909-CR-457
Criminal. Affirms trial court’s denial of motion to suppress. Compliance with the Pirtle requirement (Pirtle v. State, 323 N.E.2d 634 (Ind. 1975)) was unnecessary and consent to pat-down search was valid.

Ronald Brooks v. Zores, Inc. (NFP)
93A02-1002-EX-336
Civil. Affirms full Worker’s Compensation Board’s dismissal of Brooks’ bad-faith claim.

Quintez D. Motley v. State of Indiana (NFP)
27A02-0912-CR-1222
Criminal. Affirms convictions of armed robbery, criminal confinement, carjacking, and two counts of burglary, all as Class B felonies, and theft as a Class D felony.

Anthony Fulton v. State of Indiana (NFP)
43A05-1003-CR-267
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class A misdemeanor conversion.

Mark A. Jenkins v. State of Indiana (NFP)
82A04-1005-PC-319
Post-conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.

Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of M.B., J.B., and T.B.; R.B. v. IDCS (NFP)
49A05-1002-JT-89
Juvenile. Affirms involuntary termination of parental rights.

Indiana Tax Court had posted not opinions at IL deadline.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Based on several recent Indy Star articles, I would agree that being a case worker would be really hard. You would see the worst of humanity on a daily basis; and when things go wrong guess who gets blamed??!! Not biological parent!! Best of luck to those who entered that line of work.

  2. I was looking through some of your blog posts on this internet site and I conceive this web site is rattling informative ! Keep on posting . dfkcfdkdgbekdffe

  3. Don't believe me, listen to Pacino: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6bC9w9cH-M

  4. Law school is social control the goal to produce a social product. As such it began after the Revolution and has nearly ruined us to this day: "“Scarcely any political question arises in the United States which is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question. Hence all parties are obliged to borrow, in their daily controversies, the ideas, and even the language, peculiar to judicial proceedings. As most public men [i.e., politicians] are, or have been, legal practitioners, they introduce the customs and technicalities of their profession into the management of public affairs. The jury extends this habitude to all classes. The language of the law thus becomes, in some measure, a vulgar tongue; the spirit of the law, which is produced in the schools and courts of justice, gradually penetrates beyond their walls into the bosom of society, where it descends to the lowest classes, so that at last the whole people contract the habits and the tastes of the judicial magistrate.” ? Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America

  5. Attorney? Really? Or is it former attorney? Status with the Ind St Ct? Status with federal court, with SCOTUS? This is a legal newspaper, or should I look elsewhere?

ADVERTISEMENT