Indiana Supreme Court
Max
Koenig v. State of Indiana
42S04-1009-CR-505
Criminal. Affirms conviction of dealing in a schedule II controlled substance as a Class B felony. The admission of the laboratory
report without letting Koenig confront the person who created it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt under Chapman
v. California.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Term.
of Parent-Child Rel. of J.W. and S.W.; L.W. v. IDCS (NFP)
82A01-1002-JT-124
Juvenile. Affirms termination of parental rights.
Jack
Edward Martin v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A03-1002-CR-132
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class A felony burglary.
Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
The Indiana Supreme Court granted 4 transfers and denied 26 for the week ending Sept. 17.
ILNews
Sponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.