ILNews

Opinions Sept. 21, 2011

September 21, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

7th Circuit Court of Appeals had posted no opinions from Indiana courts at IL deadline.

Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.


Indiana Court of Appeals
George W. Giltner, Jr. v. Betty L. Ivers, Martin Zacharias, Jr., and Bradi L. Zacharias
10A05-1010-PL-662
Civil plenary. Affirms trial court’s confirmation of a report that partitioned 16.5 acres of a 100-acre parcel to Giltner, who owned an undivided 20 percent interest in the parcel. Giltner has not shown that he was prejudiced by the division outlined in the report.

In the Matter of the Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of T.P.: C.P. v. Indiana Dept. of Child Svcs. (NFP)
71A03-1103-JT-178
Juvenile. Affirms termination of parental rights.

James Gerald v. State of Indiana (NFP)
20A03-1101-CR-49
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class B felony burglary and adjudication as a habitual offender.

Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of J.E.: C.E., v. Indiana Department of Child Svcs. and Child Advocates, Inc. (NFP)
49A04-1101-JT-20
Juvenile. Affirms termination of parental rights.

Barbara Noonan, Robert Noonan, and Earnest Cross v. SLF, LLC (NFP)
49A02-1104-CC-345
Civil collection. Affirms summary judgment in favor of landlord SLF and remands for determination of reasonable appellate attorney fees to be awarded to SLF.

James Bellamy v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1102-CR-68
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor battery.

Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. What is this, the Ind Supreme Court thinking that there is a separation of powers and limited enumerated powers as delegated by a dusty old document? Such eighteen century thinking, so rare and unwanted by the elites in this modern age. Dictate to us, dictate over us, the massess are chanting! George Soros agrees. Time to change with times Ind Supreme Court, says all President Snows. Rule by executive decree is the new black.

  2. I made the same argument before a commission of the Indiana Supreme Court and then to the fedeal district and federal appellate courts. Fell flat. So very glad to read that some judges still beleive that evidentiary foundations matter.

  3. KUDOS to the Indiana Supreme Court for realizing that some bureacracies need to go to the stake. Recall what RWR said: "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" NOW ... what next to this rare and inspiring chopping block? Well, the Commission on Gender and Race (but not religion!?!) is way overdue. And some other Board's could be cut with a positive for State and the reputation of the Indiana judiciary.

  4. During a visit where an informant with police wears audio and video, does the video necessary have to show hand to hand transaction of money and narcotics?

  5. I will agree with that as soon as law schools stop lying to prospective students about salaries and employment opportunities in the legal profession. There is no defense to the fraudulent numbers first year salaries they post to mislead people into going to law school.

ADVERTISEMENT