7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Trent
L. Chapin v. Fort-Rohr Motors Inc.
09-1347
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division, Judge Theresa L. Springmann.
Civil. Reverses denial of Fort-Rohr’s motion for judgment as a matter of law after a jury found in Chapin’s favor
in his retaliation suit. Fort-Rohr was entitled to judgment as a matter of law because Chapin did not produce sufficient evidence
to support an actual or constructive discharge.
Indiana Supreme Court
In
the Matter of Anonymous
No. 10S00-1006-DI-288
Discipline. The high court privately reprimands a Clark County attorney for violating Indiana Professional Conduct Rule 5.5(a)
for assisting in the unauthorized practice of law in this state. Respondent agreed to serve as local counsel for Kentucky
attorney John Redelberger who represented an Indiana client. Once in court, the judge informed Respondent that Redelberger
was not licensed to practice law in Indiana. Respondent told Redelberger he must seek temporary admission and sent Redelberger
a copy of the applicable rule; however neither followed through on obtaining temporary admission. The Supreme Court noted
that Indiana attorneys serving as local counsel for out-of-state attorneys are hereby advised of the importance of their duty
to ensure complete and timely compliance with all the requirements of Admission and Discipline Rule 3(2).
Indiana Court of Appeals
In
the Matter of the Unsupervised Estate of Judith E. Phillips v. Rainer Assmann (NFP)
40A05-1001-EU-33
Estate, Unsupervised. Affirms trial court judgment in favor of Assmann for $34,514.04, concluding it did not abuse its discretion
in ruling on the competence of Assmann’s testimony under the Dead Man’s Statute.
Daniel
E. Hoagland, et al. v. Dorothy H. Mosier, et al. (NFP)
76A03-0911-CV-521
Civil. Affirms trial court’s judgment approving a signed memorandum of agreement and quieting title to each party’s
lot.
Ahmed
Bellamy v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-1002-CR-54
Criminal. Affirms trial court order that Bellamy serve the remainder of his outstanding sentence imposed after his probation
revocation.
The following opion was posted after IL deadline Thursday.
Indiana Tax Court
6787
Steelworkers Hall, Inc. v. John R. Scott, Assessor of Porter County
No. 49T10-0906-TA-27
Tax. Affirms Indiana Board of Tax Review’s determination that Local 6787’s banquet facility is not predominately
used for education or charitable purposes and therefore is 100 percent taxable.














Never heard of remand to another state. How often does that happen?
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.