Indiana Supreme Court
Matter
of the Estate of Harry L. Rickert
18S04-1002-CV-118
Civil. Reverses judgment in favor of Taylor, who was Rickert’s power of attorney, that she receive the money from accounts
in which she was a joint holder. The presumption is that Taylor’s use of her power of attorney to benefit herself made
those accounts invalid, and she failed to overcome that presumption to allow her to inherit the money. Remands with direction
to order restoration to the estate of bank accounts owned of record by Rickert and Taylor that were created through use of
Taylor’s power of attorney from Rickert and lacking any support documentation indicating participation by Rickert.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Mark
Kinsel v. Robert and Dolores Schoen
25A05-0910-CV-615
Civil. Affirms denial of Kinsel’s motion to correct error following a judgment in favor of the Schoens for damages
and injunctive relief against Kinsel for negligence, nuisance, and trespass. The trial court correctly determined the common
enemy doctrine doesn’t apply and Kinsel may be held liable for his leaking pond.
Robert
C. Bergstrom, Jr. v. State of Indiana
92A05-1003-IF-170
Infraction. Dismisses appeal because Bergstrom failed to timely file his notice of appeal within 30 days from the date his
motion to correct error was deemed denied. Bergstrom did not file his notice of appeal until March 4, 2010, which, while within
30 days from the date the trial court issued an order denying Bergstrom’s motion to correct error, was not within 30
days from the date his motion was deemed denied under Indiana Trial Rule 53.3(A).
Wolverine
Mutual Insurance Company v. Jeremy Oliver
20A03-1003-SC-162
Small claim. Affirms judgment in favor of Oliver in an action against him arising from an uninsured motor vehicle accident.
The relaxed rules in the small-claims setting in Indiana, coupled with the provision in S.C.R. 4(A) that places the statute
of limitations at issue without the need for the defendant to raise it, allows a small-claims court to decide a case based
upon the statute of limitations where the defendant failed to raise or mention it at trial, but the matter was discussed during
trial.
Thomas
C. Temperly v. State of Indiana
49A02-1001-CR-52
Criminal. Remands with instructions to vacate the Class A misdemeanor conviction and sentence for operating a vehicle while
intoxicated and enter judgment and an appropriate sentence for Class A misdemeanor operating with a blood alcohol content
of 0.15 or more. There was insufficient evidence Temperly operated his vehicle while intoxicated in a manner that endangered
a person. Finds the consensual chemical test was reasonable under the state and federal constitutions. The BAC evidence was
validly obtained pursuant to Indiana Code Section 9-30-7-3, complied with the requirements of I.C. Section 9-30-6-2, and was
admissible in Temperly’s prosecution under Chapter 9-30-5
Steve
Brown v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1002-PC-227
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.
Wilfred
V. Rhea, III v. State of Indiana (NFP)
82A01-0910-CR-485
Criminal. Vacates conviction of operating a vehicle with a BAC of at least 0.08 but less than 0.15 as a Class C misdemeanor.
Remands for further proceedings.
M.S.,
Alleged to be C.H.I.N.S.; J.F. v. I.D.C.S. (NFP)
42A01-1001-JC-32
Juvenile. Affirms adjudication of M.S. as a child in need of services.
Ricardo
A. Telfer v. State of Indiana (NFP)
20A05-1001-CR-106
Criminal. Affirms conviction of and sentence for Class B felony dealing in cocaine.
David
D. Lewis v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1002-CR-139
Criminal. Affirms the search warrant issued justified the search that turned up the drugs and affirms convictions of Class
A felony dealing in cocaine and Class A misdemeanor possession of marijuana. Reverses conviction of Class C felony possession
of cocaine and a firearm and remands to the trial court with instructions to vacate it and the sentence.
Fred Mott v. Ed Buss, et al. (NFP)
46A04-1003-SC-170
Small claim. Affirms dismissal of Mott’s small-claims action.
State
of Indiana v. Charles Boyle (NFP)
49A05-0911-PC-627
Post conviction. Reverses order granting Boyle’s petition to modify his conviction of operating a motor vehicle while
a habitual traffic violator as a Class D felony to a Class A misdemeanor.
Courtney
E. Terhune v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1003-CR-228
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class B felony burglary and Class D felony theft.
Kevin
D. Duncan v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1003-CR-244
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class B felony burglary.
Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.