The Indiana Supreme Court issued an administrative order Tuesday allowing the executive secretary of the Indiana Supreme
Court Disciplinary Commission and the executive director of the Indiana Commission on Continuing Legal Education to continue
to grant waivers to attorneys for delinquent fees and reinstatement fees assessed pursuant to Admission & Discipline Rules
23(21) and 29(7).
The waivers may be granted upon a written showing of good cause and upon such grounds are just and proper under the circumstances.
If the executive director and executive secretary can't agree upon the disposition of any waiver request, it will be submitted
to the chief justice for final action. Joint decisions of the executive secretary and executive director are final and unappealable.
The order continues a policy that's been in place since 1999. In the mid-1990s, the Supreme Court changed a rule that
previously had allowed inactive lawyers to not pay annual registration fees, said Disciplinary Commission Executive Secretary
Donald Lundberg. The policy revision allowed inactive attorneys to pay half the regular active registration fee instead, and
a notice was sent to impacted attorneys.
"But we knew there'd be an unknown group of lawyers that we were convinced were out there and wouldn't get this
notice," Lundberg said. "So, going on, we knew we'd be liberal on waiving fees for any inactive lawyers coming
out of the woodwork."
Most of those inactive attorneys were suspended in 2005 and the 1999 administrative order let the Disciplinary Commission
and Commission on Continuing Legal Education consider waiving those registration fees on a case-by-case basis. Lundberg said
at one point, the court considered the fee waiver requests, but the administrative task was delegated to Lundberg and Julia
Orzeske, executive director of the Commission on CLE.
In addition to requests for wavier from inactive attorneys, Lundberg said they've received requests from active attorneys
facing extraordinary circumstances, like bankruptcy or health emergencies that may warrant a waiver of the fees due by Oct.
1. The offices don't officially track the numbers, but Lundberg said they receive about two dozen requests from active
lawyers each year and between 10 and 20 percent are granted. Only a handful of inactive attorneys ask for the waiver and most
of those are granted.














I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.