ILNews

Out of the courtroom, into the kitchen

Marilyn Odendahl
November 21, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

At the end of a busy workday or while “taking five” during the weekend, many lawyers find themselves venturing into the kitchen in search of food ready to grab and go. But for some attorneys, the lure of the kitchen involves preparation and cooking.

For the latter group, being in the kitchen is not a chore. Putting ingredients together, chopping, braising and roasting is the way they relax and exercise their artistic side. But more than making a meal, they enjoy cooking because it is often paired with family and friends.

The phrase, “I cook” is often followed by a recollection of what they made and who was there to eat with them.

That convivial nature of cooking and dining winds through the stories these attorneys have of their culinary adventures. Even while many insist they are not great or accomplished cooks, they still talk about cooking with love and garnish their tales with a lot of delicious examples.

Empty stomach

Scott Chinn’s cooking skills started to take root when he was a latchkey kid. Coming home from school in the afternoons, his house was as empty as

moberly-recipe.jpg

 his stomach.

His technique and talent evolved from there as he largely taught himself through observation and replication. When he enters the kitchen today, he sees himself as a “jack of all cooking trades” kind of chef.

Chinn switches his focus between preparing a five- to six-course dinner to serve at a dinner party for friends and colleagues to putting on a grill-master hat and tailgating at Indiana University football games.

When entertaining friends, he usually makes a meal centered on a particular theme, like the cuisine of northeast France, Cajun Creole or even something eclectic like half California fare and half All-American staples.

“It’s the creativity,” Chinn said of his attraction to cooking. “I try to be creative as a lawyer, but there’s only so much you can do.”

Lately, Chinn, a partner at Faegre Baker Daniels LLP and current president of the Indianapolis Bar Association, has been doing a lot of traveling which has kept him out of town and away from home. In a nod to his childhood experience, Chinn has expanded his cooking portfolio to making one-pot meals before he goes on the road so his wife can have a hot meal when she comes home with an empty stomach.

Missing Ina
As a mother with three children in the house, Robyn Moberly had to prepare the meals. But once the youngsters became adults and were living on their own, she discovered she could turn from cooking the “boring stuff” to putting in more creative effort and trying new dishes.

Her menus now include shrimp creole, leg of lamb with orzo and roasted vegetables on the side, soups like chicken noodle and butternut squash, roasted chicken with herbs and lemon, and salmon with a balsamic vinaigrette.

Moberly learned the techniques and discovered new recipes to try by taking a few cooking classes and reading cookbooks. When her sister told her about Ina Garten, widely known as “The Barefoot Contessa,” Moberly read her cookbooks, watched her TV show, and became a fan.

So much so that Moberly was prepared to delay her recent swearing in ceremony in order to fly to Washington D.C. for an Evening with Ina event at a local bookstore. Moberly, formerly a Marion Superior judge, was recently appointed to a 14-year term as a judge for the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Indiana.

She was scheduled to be sworn in Nov. 1 but, since that was the day she would be seeing Garten, the court moved the ceremony to Oct. 29.

However, the entire trip became foiled by super storm Sandy that ravaged the East Coast. The weather forced Garten to cancel her tour and left Moberly disappointed.

“I was anxious to meet her,” the jurist said. “She seems like a very grounded person.”

Living to eat

Driving home each night, Gary Klotz thinks about what he can make for dinner.
One night leftover roasted chicken was sandwiched with blue cheese and fig jam, then put into the Panini press. Another night black bean soup was the main course. Inviting friends over for a dinner party is common and may offer a menu of rabbit in mustard sauce or leg of lamb with a white wine and root vegetables.

Klotz’s approach to food reflects the attitude he encountered during his studies and travels in Europe. Where Americans eat to live, he explained, Europeans live to eat.

“It’s still a big part of my life,” the partner at Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP said. “I have a lot of friends who are interested in cooking, some are more interested in eating, but all enjoy a good meal with a good bottle of wine.”

Once he graduated college and got his own apartment, Klotz embraced cooking. He has made and shared meals all through law school, bachelorhood and marriage. Comfort food finds a place on his table the same as new fare like pork shoulder covered with a dry rub of fresh fennel seeds and spices, served with a side dish of eggplant, marinara sauce, arborio rice and mozzarella.

“Some people paint,” he explained. “Some people fish. I like cooking.”

Soup parties

After a meal, East Chicago attorney Paul Velligan is likely to ask for recipes.

He does not follow the instructions to the precise teaspoon measurement, but he is always looking for new ways to cook the ingredients in his pantry or those he brings home from the farmer’s market. Recently, he has been cajoling his Italian neighbor to let him come over before dinner so he can watch and learn how she prepares the meal.
 

EXTRA
Click here to view more recipes from the attorneys profiled here

Growing up, Velligan, along with his six brothers and one sister, were surrounded by food. His mother, grandmothers and even his father prepared hearty fare like soups and roasts, not only satisfying his hunger but also instilling in him a love of cooking.

“Food for me has been informed by a great diversity of friends and family and travels,” Velligan said.

As a student at Indiana University Maurer School of Law, Velligan continued his family’s traditions by gathering his classmates and throwing soup parties. They would cook three or four different kinds of soup and gather for an evening of sustenance and friendship.

Among his favorite soups is a concoction of stewed tomatoes, garlic, lentils and cumin. He got the recipe from the woman who used to clean the legal aid clinic at I.U. Often working late there, Velligan would take in the “incredible smells” as the janitor, who was a native of Ethiopia, heated her dinner. One night, she gave him the instructions for the soup.

“What a fantastic recipe,” he said.

The science of food

Bloomington attorney Geoffrey Grodner of Mallor Grodner LLP began cooking before there were big, bright cookbooks and food shows on television. The visuals and excitement that are common today were absent, along with the opportunity to learn.

However, after 40 years in the kitchen, Grodner has taught himself and embraced different foods. He has cooked Indian food, Thai food, and Asian food. For a dinner party, he may stick to an Italian or Mediterranean menu. At his home in Florida, he prepares a lot of fresh seafood, and during the time he vacationed in France, he cooked a lot of French cuisine.

“If the ingredients are around and the equipment is available, I’ll try to cook about anything,” he said.

Lately he has been preparing to experiment with molecular gastronomy – the new frontier of cooking. This is more science than cooking, he said, the method encapsulates surprising flavors in gelled spheres.

Grodner’s love of cooking is shared by many lawyers, as is his having to squeeze the cooking into a busy schedule.

“If you’re a practicing attorney,” he admits, “cooking every night is a challenge.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. So that none are misinformed by my posting wihtout a non de plume here, please allow me to state that I am NOT an Indiana licensed attorney, although I am an Indiana resident approved to practice law and represent clients in Indiana's fed court of Nth Dist and before the 7th circuit. I remain licensed in KS, since 1996, no discipline. This must be clarified since the IN court records will reveal that I did sit for and pass the Indiana bar last February. Yet be not confused by the fact that I was so allowed to be tested .... I am not, to be clear in the service of my duty to be absolutely candid about this, I AM NOT a member of the Indiana bar, and might never be so licensed given my unrepented from errors of thought documented in this opinion, at fn2, which likely supports Mr Smith's initial post in this thread: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1592921.html

  2. When I served the State of Kansas as Deputy AG over Consumer Protection & Antitrust for four years, supervising 20 special agents and assistant attorneys general (back before the IBLE denied me the right to practice law in Indiana for not having the right stuff and pretty much crushed my legal career) we had a saying around the office: Resist the lure of the ring!!! It was a take off on Tolkiem, the idea that absolute power (I signed investigative subpoenas as a judge would in many other contexts, no need to show probable cause)could corrupt absolutely. We feared that we would overreach constitutional limits if not reminded, over and over, to be mindful to not do so. Our approach in so challenging one another was Madisonian, as the following quotes from the Father of our Constitution reveal: The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse. We are right to take alarm at the first experiment upon our liberties. I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations. Liberty may be endangered by the abuse of liberty, but also by the abuse of power. All men having power ought to be mistrusted. -- James Madison, Federalist Papers and other sources: http://www.constitution.org/jm/jm_quotes.htm RESIST THE LURE OF THE RING ALL YE WITH POLITICAL OR JUDICIAL POWER!

  3. My dear Mr Smith, I respect your opinions and much enjoy your posts here. We do differ on our view of the benefits and viability of the American Experiment in Ordered Liberty. While I do agree that it could be better, and that your points in criticism are well taken, Utopia does indeed mean nowhere. I think Madison, Jefferson, Adams and company got it about as good as it gets in a fallen post-Enlightenment social order. That said, a constitution only protects the citizens if it is followed. We currently have a bevy of public officials and judicial agents who believe that their subjectivism, their personal ideology, their elitist fears and concerns and cause celebs trump the constitutions of our forefathers. This is most troubling. More to follow in the next post on that subject.

  4. Yep I am not Bryan Brown. Bryan you appear to be a bigger believer in the Constitution than I am. Were I still a big believer then I might be using my real name like you. Personally, I am no longer a fan of secularism. I favor the confessional state. In religious mattes, it seems to me that social diversity is chaos and conflict, while uniformity is order and peace.... secularism has been imposed by America on other nations now by force and that has not exactly worked out very well.... I think the American historical experiment with disestablishmentarianism is withering on the vine before our eyes..... Since I do not know if that is OK for an officially licensed lawyer to say, I keep the nom de plume.

  5. I am compelled to announce that I am not posting under any Smith monikers here. That said, the post below does have a certain ring to it that sounds familiar to me: http://www.catholicnewworld.com/cnwonline/2014/0907/cardinal.aspx

ADVERTISEMENT