ILNews

Panel to oversee transition of toxicology department

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Gov. Mitch Daniels has appointed a three-member panel to oversee the transition of the department of toxicology to the State of Indiana from Indiana University School of Medicine. The panel will begin work immediately, Daniels’ office reported June 21.

The transition is a result of Senate Enrolled Act 431, authored by Sen. Tom Wyss, R-Fort Wayne, which became Public Law 158. The new law creates the State Department of Toxicology, which will bring the lab under the umbrella of the state government’s executive branch.

Judge Linda Chezem, Dr. James Klaunig, and Michael Medler were appointed to the panel.

Chezem retired from the Indiana Court of Appeals in 1998. Since then, she has worked to improve adjudication and has focused on the impact of alcohol abuse on public health and the judicial system. She is nationally recognized for her work regarding impaired driving for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and is a part-time professor at Purdue University.

Klaunig is a professor and chair of the Department of Environmental Health at Indiana University. He was the state toxicologist from 1991 until retiring in 2003. He is a fellow in the Academy of Toxicological Sciences and has received numerous awards honoring his scientific contributions and service to the field of toxicology. Klaunig serves on many national-level committees.

Medler was a trooper for the Indiana State Police from 1976 to 2005, retiring as a lieutenant colonel and the leader of the Bureau of Criminal Investigations’ criminal investigations, gaming and laboratory division. While assigned to the Fort Wayne regional crime lab, Medler managed the field support section of the forensic laboratory and was in charge of the Indiana State Police satellite regional labs.

Toxicology department operations will continue as currently organized at the start of the transition. A memorandum of understanding between the state and IU School of Medicine is being developed to govern the department's activities. The panel will guide the transition, establish qualifications for a permanent director, develop a program for the deployment of breath test equipment and the certification of public safety officials for the operation of that equipment, and set the course for the accreditation of the toxicology laboratory. The panel will deliver its report to the governor and legislative council by Sept. 1, 2012, and will sunset in December of 2012.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. "Am I bugging you? I don't mean to bug ya." If what I wrote below is too much social philosophy for Indiana attorneys, just take ten this vacay to watch The Lego Movie with kiddies and sing along where appropriate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etzMjoH0rJw

  2. I've got some free speech to share here about who is at work via the cat's paw of the ACLU stamping out Christian observances.... 2 Thessalonians chap 2: "And we also thank God continually because, when you received the word of God, which you heard from us, you accepted it not as a human word, but as it actually is, the word of God, which is indeed at work in you who believe. For you, brothers and sisters, became imitators of God’s churches in Judea, which are in Christ Jesus: You suffered from your own people the same things those churches suffered from the Jews who killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets and also drove us out. They displease God and are hostile to everyone in their effort to keep us from speaking to the Gentiles so that they may be saved. In this way they always heap up their sins to the limit. The wrath of God has come upon them at last."

  3. Did someone not tell people who have access to the Chevy Volts that it has a gas engine and will run just like a normal car? The batteries give the Volt approximately a 40 mile range, but after that the gas engine will propel the vehicle either directly through the transmission like any other car, or gas engine recharges the batteries depending on the conditions.

  4. Catholic, Lutheran, even the Baptists nuzzling the wolf! http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-documents-reveal-obama-hhs-paid-baptist-children-family-services-182129786-four-months-housing-illegal-alien-children/ YET where is the Progressivist outcry? Silent. I wonder why?

  5. Thank you, Honorable Ladies, and thank you, TIL, for this interesting interview. The most interesting question was the last one, which drew the least response. Could it be that NFP stamps are a threat to the very foundation of our common law American legal tradition, a throwback to the continental system that facilitated differing standards of justice? A throwback to Star Chamber’s protection of the landed gentry? If TIL ever again interviews this same panel, I would recommend inviting one known for voicing socio-legal dissent for the masses, maybe Welch, maybe Ogden, maybe our own John Smith? As demographics shift and our social cohesion precipitously drops, a consistent judicial core will become more and more important so that Justice and Equal Protection and Due Process are yet guiding stars. If those stars fall from our collective social horizon (and can they be seen even now through the haze of NFP opinions?) then what glue other than more NFP decisions and TRO’s and executive orders -- all backed by more and more lethally armed praetorians – will prop up our government institutions? And if and when we do arrive at such an end … will any then dare call that tyranny? Or will the cost of such dissent be too high to justify?

ADVERTISEMENT