The American Constitution Society for Law and Policy's Indianapolis Lawyer Chapter is bringing together attorneys, a
state representative, and a political science professor Jan. 27 to discuss the 2008 presidential election results in Indiana
and the country. The panelists will discuss voting trends and issues as well as take questions from the audience.
The panelists are attorney and state Rep. Ed DeLaney, D-Indianapolis; Jon Elrod, partner at Elrod & Mascher and former
state representative; Margie Hershey, professor of political science at Indiana University in Bloomington; and Geoffrey Slaughter;
partner at Taft Stettinius & Hollister and president of the Indianapolis Lawyers Chapter of the Federalist Society.
The event is free and will be held in the Wynne Courtroom at Indiana University School of Law - Indianapolis. RSVP at the
Indianapolis Lawyer Chapter's Web site or at the door at 5 p.m. The discussion is from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. and food and
refreshments will be provided. For more information, contact Dino Pollock at (312) 519-8573 or illinidp43@yahoo.com.
ILNews
Panelists to discuss Indiana's role in election
Sponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
-
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
-
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
-
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
-
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
-
Wow, just wow.
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
Conversations
0 Comments
Add Comment