ILNews

Groups partner to offer legal services to homeless veterans

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Finding legal services for homeless veterans took longer than expected, but attorneys spearheading the effort believe the solution they found will not only help former military personnel become self-sufficient but also has potential to become a model for other agencies serving the homeless.

In the fall of 2012, a group of Indianapolis lawyers working with the Hoosier Veterans Assistance Foundation of Indiana Inc. put out a call for “good ideas.” They wanted suggestions on ways to provide ongoing assistance to help homeless veterans at HVAF overcome the legal issues that often hinder their ability to get a job and find housing.

homelessvets-15col.jpg At a special ceremony July 11, Charles Haenlein (left), of Hoosier Veterans Assistance Foundation of Indiana Inc., and Josh Abel, of the Neighborhood Christian Legal Clinic, signed the agreement that will provide ongoing legal services to homeless veterans at HVAF. (IL Photo/ Aaron P. Bernstein)

On July 11, HVAF took the final step in the process and signed an agreement with the Neighborhood Christian Legal Clinic, which will provide legal services to help the veterans.

The two nonprofits marked the milestone by holding a special signing ceremony at HVAF’s main facility. Several homeless veterans who attended the event gave a hearty round of applause when the signing was completed.

Steve Benz, HVAF board chair, told the HVAF clients that this agreement means they will no longer get passed around whenever they seek help with their legal entanglements.

Instead, they will only have to tell their story once to the attorney provided by the clinic. In turn, the attorney will be part of the treatment team and actively participate as these veterans regain their lives.

“I think we landed a tremendous partner,” Benz said of the Neighborhood Christian Legal Clinic. “They came to this program with such a level of enthusiasm.”

When the team of attorneys began the effort, they initially thought the solution would entail hiring a lawyer full time as part of HVAF’s staff. However, Bill Moreau, partner at Barnes & Thornburg LLP, said that idea evolved as the responses to the request for “good ideas” arrived from other attorneys and legal service providers. Barnes & Thornburg handled this project from start to finish pro bono.

By entering into a partnership with the Neighborhood Christian Legal Clinic, HVAF will be able to get legal assistance to its veterans and get a better understanding of how great the need is, Moreau explained.

The agreement runs for one year at which time the partnership will be evaluated. Benz asked the HVAF veterans to provide feedback on the program. The partnering agencies and the attorneys want to hear their complaints and compliments so the legal services being provided can be improved.

Brian Dunkel, from the clinic, will become the project attorney for the partnership. He will go the HVAF offices once a week to meet with current and prospective clients.

The Neighborhood Christian Legal Clinic has experience in partnering with other nonprofits. Josh Abel, executive director of the clinic, said his agency has learned from past attempts to help the homeless that working alongside other organizations is the most effective way to reach this population.

Through these other partnerships, the clinic attorneys have been able to go to where the homeless already receive some services. More important, Abel said, the lawyers can know the whole story and all the issues the individual is facing.

Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP partner Trent Sandifur has donated his services to the veterans and was part of the effort to get stable legal services to HVAF.

This partnership, he said, will enable the treatment team to get to the root cause of a veteran’s homelessness. Having the attorney onboard will allow the staff to resolve the issues rather than just put a bandage on the problem.

As excited as he and his colleagues are about this partnership, he believes the HVAF clients will become equally enthusiastic.

“Most homeless veterans are just happy to have someone on their team to be an advocate,” Sandifur said. “They are so used to the system working against them.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. So that none are misinformed by my posting wihtout a non de plume here, please allow me to state that I am NOT an Indiana licensed attorney, although I am an Indiana resident approved to practice law and represent clients in Indiana's fed court of Nth Dist and before the 7th circuit. I remain licensed in KS, since 1996, no discipline. This must be clarified since the IN court records will reveal that I did sit for and pass the Indiana bar last February. Yet be not confused by the fact that I was so allowed to be tested .... I am not, to be clear in the service of my duty to be absolutely candid about this, I AM NOT a member of the Indiana bar, and might never be so licensed given my unrepented from errors of thought documented in this opinion, at fn2, which likely supports Mr Smith's initial post in this thread: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1592921.html

  2. When I served the State of Kansas as Deputy AG over Consumer Protection & Antitrust for four years, supervising 20 special agents and assistant attorneys general (back before the IBLE denied me the right to practice law in Indiana for not having the right stuff and pretty much crushed my legal career) we had a saying around the office: Resist the lure of the ring!!! It was a take off on Tolkiem, the idea that absolute power (I signed investigative subpoenas as a judge would in many other contexts, no need to show probable cause)could corrupt absolutely. We feared that we would overreach constitutional limits if not reminded, over and over, to be mindful to not do so. Our approach in so challenging one another was Madisonian, as the following quotes from the Father of our Constitution reveal: The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse. We are right to take alarm at the first experiment upon our liberties. I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations. Liberty may be endangered by the abuse of liberty, but also by the abuse of power. All men having power ought to be mistrusted. -- James Madison, Federalist Papers and other sources: http://www.constitution.org/jm/jm_quotes.htm RESIST THE LURE OF THE RING ALL YE WITH POLITICAL OR JUDICIAL POWER!

  3. My dear Mr Smith, I respect your opinions and much enjoy your posts here. We do differ on our view of the benefits and viability of the American Experiment in Ordered Liberty. While I do agree that it could be better, and that your points in criticism are well taken, Utopia does indeed mean nowhere. I think Madison, Jefferson, Adams and company got it about as good as it gets in a fallen post-Enlightenment social order. That said, a constitution only protects the citizens if it is followed. We currently have a bevy of public officials and judicial agents who believe that their subjectivism, their personal ideology, their elitist fears and concerns and cause celebs trump the constitutions of our forefathers. This is most troubling. More to follow in the next post on that subject.

  4. Yep I am not Bryan Brown. Bryan you appear to be a bigger believer in the Constitution than I am. Were I still a big believer then I might be using my real name like you. Personally, I am no longer a fan of secularism. I favor the confessional state. In religious mattes, it seems to me that social diversity is chaos and conflict, while uniformity is order and peace.... secularism has been imposed by America on other nations now by force and that has not exactly worked out very well.... I think the American historical experiment with disestablishmentarianism is withering on the vine before our eyes..... Since I do not know if that is OK for an officially licensed lawyer to say, I keep the nom de plume.

  5. I am compelled to announce that I am not posting under any Smith monikers here. That said, the post below does have a certain ring to it that sounds familiar to me: http://www.catholicnewworld.com/cnwonline/2014/0907/cardinal.aspx

ADVERTISEMENT