A former president of the National Rifle Association will visit two Indiana law schools Nov. 3 to discuss the Second Amendment
and gun bans.
The Indiana University Maurer School of Law student chapter of the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies will
host a discussion with Sandy Froman about gun bans around the country. Signs will direct attendees to the room holding the
discussion, said chapter president Armen Boyajian.
Froman, NRA president from 2005-2007 and now a practicing attorney in Arizona, will speak at Indiana University Maurer School
of Law at noon. Her discussion, "The Chicago Gun Case: How Should our Second Amendment Civil Right to Bear Arms Apply
to States and Municipalities?" will examine the Chicago and Washington, D.C., bans and how guns are being considered
by some as the new "abortion" issue for the Supreme Court of the United States of America. The SCOTUS recently
granted certiorari to McDonald, et al. v. City of Chicago, et al., No. 08-1521, which deals with the federalism question of
how the Second Amendment should be applied to the states.
At 4:30 p.m., Froman will visit the Indiana University School of Law - Indianapolis student chapter at the event, "NRA
v. Chicago - Does the Second Amendment Apply to States Through the 14th Amendment?" That discussion will be in the Wynne
Courtroom at the law school, 530 W. New York St.
Both events are free and open to the public. Reservations are requested for the Indianapolis event, and people may RSVP to
Stephen.Simcox@gmail.com.














Never heard of remand to another state. How often does that happen?
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.