A documentary of a simulated terrorist attack that took place at Indiana University School of Law - Indianapolis in October
will premiere on Indianapolis PBS affiliate WFYI, Channel 20, Jan. 21 at 7:30 p.m. There will also be a private reception
and screening of the film Jan. 20.
"Tough Decisions: Defending the Homeland" will offer an inside look at the Oct. 23 simulation that engaged approximately
50 students of the law school and the School of Public and Environmental Affairs at Indiana University - Purdue University
Indianapolis.
Students were in separate rooms that represented various locales, including Indianapolis, Washington, D.C., and Tel Aviv.
Participants were told what their roles would be in the simulation ahead of time and were given time for outside research
on what someone in their role could or would do, including what they had learned in professor Shawn Boyne's comparative
national security law course.
Boyne, along with other experts and professors, helped coordinate the event and was on hand as the students dealt with an
"attack" on Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis. Part of the simulation was that the stadium was a gathering place
for a national conference of high school students who belonged to Future Farmers of America. There was an actual FFA national
conference in Indianapolis the weekend of the simulation, but no actual terror attack.
Among the issues students addressed were the legal implications of their decisions, what would happen if there were problems
with technology for communications, and other questions someone in their position would have to answer in a real terrorism
situation.
The documentary was filmed by students from professor Michael R. Maitzen's video production class in IUPUI's School
of Liberal Arts, and a professional documentary team from WFYI Productions.
Indiana Lawyer reported on the event in the Nov. 11-24, 2009, edition, "Students simulate attacks."














vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.