ILNews

Pence signs into law changes to sex offender registry

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Changes are coming to Indiana’s sex offender registry, thanks to a new law signed by Gov. Mike Pence Thursday.

HEA 1053 requires the Indiana Department of Correction to remove information from the online public portal of the sex offender registry relating to a sex or violent offender who no longer is required to register or is deceased. The new law also adds the vehicle identification number of the vehicle owned or regularly operated by the offender to the information he or she is required to provide for sex offender registration. Driver’s licenses or ID cards must contain the offender’s current address and physical description.

Among other things, the law also merges the offense of criminal deviate conduct into the crime of rape and repeals the criminal deviate conduct statute, effective July 1, 2014.

The introduced version of the bill was prepared by the Criminal Law and Sentencing Policy Study Committee.

Pence also signed HEA 1159, which limits the liability of a public school or an accredited nonpublic school that provides community-use physical fitness activities to the general public.

The governor still has dozens of enrolled acts before him with a signing or veto deadline of Saturday, including HEA 1393 on judicial technology and automation and HEA 1320 on workers’ compensation.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • From An Ex-Sex Offender
    Charged with Child Exploitation-Dismissed by the Judge, Listed on my Arrest record as Guilty, cause a woman pen pal traced her breast for me whom over the age of 18 in 11 years ago, now in her 40 years. I am 57. That's Indiana justice. I have never photographed any woman sexually.
  • mark up
    People who molest children, and that includes pubescent minors, but the perverts who do that, should be thankful for the mercy of the sex offender registry. There are other just punishments which could be meted out to them which would "mark them for life" in a far more definite manner.
  • Shower Needed
    A "passionate choice"? Sexual Misconduct with a Minor only applies to 14 and 15 year old children. Calling a 15 year old an "older teenager" is like calling a 2009 Taurus a "new car". Sure, you are only fudging by a couple of years - but those years make a difference.
  • Non violent sex offenders doomed to fail
    According to Indiana laws dumping men who have consensual sex with an older teen with rapist and violent offenders dooms them to fail. They are forced to live in substandard neighborhoods with questionable people and are considered dangerous when seeking employment in the job market. One passionate choice marks them for life even if they only have to register for 10 years, plus they are harassed by the local law officials.
    • get a lawyer dude
      GET A LAWYER AND DONT POST DETAILS ABOUT YOUR CASE ONLINE!
    • were to live
      hi im going to soon be a sex offender the cops came raided my house on a gun charge ott my computer and on one file of a EX girl friend that was 15 when i took it and now is over 18 i was charge with child porn i didnt know i still had the pic but while i was in jail my 1st court date i was handed a new charge of the child porn now idk what to do i have just about beating everything else but tho my drop other charge on violating my rights they will not drop this and idk what im going to do from know on there saying i will be a level one but idk were i could live still to have a life and not be run out of town i already be run out of my home town of almost 20 yrs and i have not even been chared yet
      • Forced to leave Indiana
        I think Indiana is one of the worst states because of how they treat sex offenders. I am a married man with four children and my job was constantly harassed due to people looking at their neighborhood on the registry and they could see that I worked nearby in a factory. The HR department head employee personally told me people were calling. My question is just why does someone need to know where I work other than the police? All that did was open me for harassment. I eventually received a Bachelors degree and it was hard to get a job for the fact the businesses knew I would appear on a map above their building. In the end I moved my family to another state where they dont put your face or mention where you work and I went from having to report every 3 months to just once a year. Even the police here said it was stupid to show where I worked because the business could face harassment and that I still had to work to feed my family regardless of being on the registry. In the end, I am glad I left Indiana and will never return to that extremely hateful state.
        • Larger picture
          Wouldn't it be beneficial to change the laws to give those that are not a "threat" to society a chance to rebuild their lives. Se offenders should be classified under the severity of their crime, not pooled together. To classify these individuals, it would give hope to making a difference and becoming a "normal" person in the community. To label all of them the same, gives a negative effect on everything they do. Since laws are beginning to change, why not consider the ones that would make a real difference in the lives of many.

          Post a comment to this story

          COMMENTS POLICY
          We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
           
          You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
           
          Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
           
          No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
           
          We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
           

          Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

          Sponsored by

          facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

          Indiana State Bar Association

          Indianapolis Bar Association

          Evansville Bar Association

          Allen County Bar Association

          Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

          facebook
          ADVERTISEMENT
          Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
          1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

          2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

          3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

          4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

          5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

          ADVERTISEMENT