Photo Gallery

Special Events Photo Gallery

Browse through special events photo galleries
View pictures of recent important local events. Photos include everything from the construction of local buildings to unfortunate disasters.
Leadership in Law 2014

Leadership in Law 2014

Lake County Bar Association

Lake County Bar Association

2013 LIL

Leadership in Law 2013

Lake County

Lake County Bar Association president installation

LIL 2012

Leadership in Law 2012

Story Inn

Story Inn

Leadership in Law 2011

Leadership in Law 2011

Egypt Web extra

Egypt Web extra

Law students in China

Law students in China

Leadership in Law

Leadership in Law

Martial Arts Web extra

Martial Arts Web extra

Diversity in Practice

Diversity in Practice

Lawyers on a mission

Lawyers on a mission

Jefferson County Courthouse Fire

Jefferson County Courthouse Fire

Leadership in Law

Leadership in Law

2009 Inauguration

2009 Inauguration

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT