ILNews

Pill mills migrating to Indiana?

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Indiana Lawyer Focus

In national news reports about pain clinics and prescription drug abuse, Indiana is usually not mentioned.

Florida, Tennessee, Washington and Kentucky are often at the center of the conversation concerning a growing epidemic of doctors and so-called pill mills that prescribe narcotic pain medications in such high doses that patients are either addicts or soon will be. The stories emerging from these hotspots tell of patients standing in a line that curves around the pain management clinic, parking lots filled with cars sporting out-of-state license plates and a rate of prescription writing that indicates the physician spent five minutes or less evaluating the patient.

grooms Grooms

But the problem of over-prescribing of controlled substances and prescription drug abuse is escalating in Indiana. Awareness is growing, and calls for action are becoming louder.

The Indiana General Assembly has established the Health Finance Commission to study among other things, the regulation of pain management facilities and prescribers of controlled substances and may recommend legislation in 2013.

Members from the medical and legal professions are hesitant when asked if the Statehouse is the best place to find a solution to pill mills. Laws being enacted in other states are having unintended consequences and causing some physicians to quit prescribing pain medication altogether.

Sen. Ron Grooms, R-Jeffersonville, is a member of Health Finance Commission and, having spent his career as a pharmacist, has seen the problem up close. He emphasized he is not on a witch hunt and knows some people have debilitating pain that needs treated. However, he raised the question: Isn’t it somebody’s duty to make the medical community treat the patients rather than maintain their addiction?

Across state lines

The Clark County Wellness Clinic LLP, which recently started operating in Grooms’ hometown of Jeffersonville, highlights his concern of what could happen. Indiana has so few regulations related to pain-management facilities that as neighboring states clamp down, Grooms expects these operations will migrate across state lines to the Hoosier heartland.

In the case of Clark County Wellness, the clinic relocated from Georgetown, Ky., shortly after the Kentucky General Assembly enacted new legislation targeting pill mills. Activity at the clinic has neighbors worried that it could be a pill mill.

“Everything they’re doing is legal,” he said. “I think it’s a situation that provides medication to clientele whose medical issues need to be addressed rather than maintained.”

While the specter of migrating pill mills looms, the Indiana attorney general’s office and members of the medical community have noticed a growing problem of opioid prescribing among providers already in the state.

More and more physicians are being investigated by the Indiana attorney general and facing disciplinary action before the Indiana Medical Licensing Board for over-prescribing controlled substances.

From 1999 to 2009, unintentional poisoning, which would include prescription drug overdose, skyrocketed 502 percent in Indiana, according to a data presentation Dr. Joan Duwve of the Indiana State Health Department made to the commission. Over the decade, unintentional poisoning became the leading cause of injury death, outpacing unintentional motor vehicle accidents, suicide with a firearm, and homicide with a firearm.

Gabrielle Owens, director of the Licensing Enforcement Unit and Homeowner Protection Unit at the attorney general’s office, is unsure why complaints regarding pain medications are increasing. Either more doctors are over-prescribing or more people are aware of the issue and recognize drug abuse in their families and colleagues.

The reasons why physicians abuse their prescription pads vary, Owens said.

“We feel in some cases they were greedy. They were in it for the money,” Owens said. “Others, we

think, wow, they kind of got duped by drug addict patients who pulled the wool over their eyes.”

Still, she noted, the duped physicians had a responsibility to connect the dots.


 

No welcome mat

Whether the Legislature passes a “pill mill” law next session is uncertain. Yet, Grooms is confident if any bill emerging from the study commision gets a hearing before a committee, it will receive a passing vote.

The senator envisions any potential law as regulating both the facility and the physician. He said legislation could require pain clinics to have a special license and be owned by a licensed physician. Also, the treating doctors would possibly have to follow specific protocols such as taking a medical history, performing a physical exam, offering alternative care options, and offering to coordinate additional care with physicians from other specialties.

Pill-mill bills passed in Ohio and Kentucky are raising concerns among doctors in those states who say the laws are confusing and having unintended consequences. Indiana may be experiencing a similar situation with its law that regulates the treatment for weight loss and obesity.

This law – like the bill Grooms outlined – regulates the steps physicians must take before prescribing a controlled substance to overweight and obese patients. However, the law has not been well publicized and some doctors are getting tripped up, Brian Betner said.

An attorney at Hall Render Killian Heath & Lyman P.C., Betner has represented doctors before the Indiana Medical Licensing Board. Sometimes, he said, physicians may make a technical mistake or an innocent oversight that did not impact patient care but was still a violation that puts them at a licensing board hearing. Moreover, the board has little option but to impose disciplinary action which, in turn, can have long-term negative consequences for the doctors.

Michael Whitworth, physician and chairman of the Indiana Pain Society, cautions Indiana against following the lead of other states and hastily crafting a massive, convoluted bill that induces physicians to quit prescribing pain medication and leaves patients who are in chronic pain with no relief.

“We don’t have to rush in and craft a very detailed bill,” he said.

The IPS is proposing the state establish a Controlled Substances Commission, consisting of a variety of medical professionals from physicians to veterinarians. This group would develop regulations and disciplinary rules for opioid prescribing. If after two or three years the death rate from overdoses has not declined, then the state can try another approach.

Based on her work, Owens does not think the solution will come from one source. Instead, it will likely take a collaborative approach with the medical community, law enforcement, health department, Legislature and other groups coming together to formulate policies for Indiana.

INSPECT

The state’s database which tracks prescription narcotics, INSPECT, is universally praised and touted as something that, with wider use, could help combat over-prescribing. The system is the “gold standard” in drug monitoring in the United States, said Mike Rinebold, director of government relations for the Indiana State Medical Association.

Physicians, Whitworth said, should be required to check the database when prescribing narcotics to see if a patient has already been prescribed the drugs from another doctor. However, currently, only about 40 percent of Hoosier doctors with Controlled Substance Registry certification are enrolled in the database.

“That is a tragedy,” Whitworth said. “That means a huge group of physicians are not doing their due diligence when they take out their pens and write a prescription.”

Yet, INSPECT is headed for its own fiscal cliff. A federal grant that provides two-thirds of the funding for the program is set to expire this year.

Tens of thousands of Hoosier medical professionals in private practice, clinics and emergency rooms are impacted by INSPECT every day, Rinebold said. The ISMA has started talking to legislators who are involved in health care to raise awareness of the database and the importance of continuing funding.•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • hmmm
    Well that sounds bad and all, but worse were the bad old days in the 1980s when cancer patients and others with chronic pain couldnt get adequate narcotics for their suffering, driving many to extreme grief and suicide. "War on drugs" and all that stuff.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The practitioners and judges who hail E-filing as the Saviour of the West need to contain their respective excitements. E-filing is federal court requires the practitioner to cram his motion practice into pigeonholes created by IT people. Compound motions or those seeking alternative relief are effectively barred, unless the practitioner wants to receive a tart note from some functionary admonishing about the "problem". E-filing is just another method by which courts and judges transfer their burden to practitioners, who are the really the only powerless components of the system. Of COURSE it is easier for the court to require all of its imput to conform to certain formats, but this imposition does NOT improve the quality of the practice of law and does NOT improve the ability of the practitioner to advocate for his client or to fashion pleadings that exactly conform to his client's best interests. And we should be very wary of the disingenuous pablum about the costs. The courts will find a way to stick it to the practitioner. Lake County is a VERY good example of this rapaciousness. Any one who does not believe this is invited to review the various special fees that system imposes upon practitioners- as practitioners- and upon each case ON TOP of the court costs normal in every case manually filed. Jurisprudence according to Aldous Huxley.

  2. Any attorneys who practice in federal court should be able to say the same as I can ... efiling is great. I have been doing it in fed court since it started way back. Pacer has its drawbacks, but the ability to hit an e-docket and pull up anything and everything onscreen is a huge plus for a litigator, eps the sole practitioner, who lacks a filing clerk and the paralegal support of large firms. Were I an Indiana attorney I would welcome this great step forward.

  3. Can we get full disclosure on lobbyist's payments to legislatures such as Mr Buck? AS long as there are idiots that are disrespectful of neighbors and intent on shooting fireworks every night, some kind of regulations are needed.

  4. I am the mother of the child in this case. My silence on the matter was due to the fact that I filed, both in Illinois and Indiana, child support cases. I even filed supporting documentation with the Indiana family law court. Not sure whether this information was provided to the court of appeals or not. Wish the case was done before moving to Indiana, because no matter what, there is NO WAY the state of Illinois would have allowed an appeal on a child support case!

  5. "No one is safe when the Legislature is in session."

ADVERTISEMENT