ILNews

Poor economy, other factors leading to new economic crisis

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Statutes of limitations exist for nearly all federal criminal actions - except for espionage, treason, and since 1991, student loan default.

Delinquent borrowers may be relieved to learn that student loan default – unlike espionage and treason – is not punishable by death. But defaulting on a student loan can have disastrous effects on a borrower’s personal credit and lead to a lifetime of financial difficulties.

In February, the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys called on Congress to restore bankruptcy discharge for student loans in its report, “The Student Loan ‘Debt Bomb’: America’s Next Mortgage-Style Economic Crisis?” In the meantime, colleges, federal assistance programs and state governments are taking steps toward reducing loan debt before it becomes unmanageable.

Tom Bodin, chief economist for the Indiana attorney general’s office, said it is no surprise that the United States is on the verge of a student loan-related economic crisis. Rising tuition, combined with a long recession where many people have had difficulty finding work, means more students are relying on student loans. In 2011, overall student borrowing surpassed $1 trillion for the first time.

On average, college tuition increases by about 8 percent each year, meaning that the cost of college doubles every nine years, according to the website FinAid.org. Bodin offered a possible reason for this phenomenon.

bodin Bodin

“The theory I’ve been looking at is just that it’s an uber-competitive industry, so being able to attract the right talent and create the infrastructure that brings students to you is kind of expensive,” he said.

But Bodin said schools are beginning to recognize that students – as consumers – are looking for the best return on their investment when planning for college. “The cost of how you get there is now going to matter more than ever before,” he said.

Read a related story on the push for bankruptcy discharge for school debt.

By the numbers

The national non-profit Project on Student Debt shows that students graduate from Indiana private and public colleges with an average debt of about $27,000. That figure does not include post-graduate loans, which – if federally funded – have an interest rate of 6.8 percent, twice that of undergraduate federal loans.

The Law School Admission Council estimates the average debt owed by law school graduates is $100,000. With uncertain job prospects, that kind of debt can lead to serious financial problems down the road.

“For any kind of debt to be sustainable, there has to be income to pay it back,” said Alan White, professor of law at Valparaiso University Law School and visiting professor of law at City University of New York. “Now, we don’t know at what point student loan debt becomes too much student loan debt, but it’s clear that the current trajectory can’t continue indefinitely.”

Offering incentives

Beginning in the fall of 2012, New Jersey’s private Seton Hall University will begin offering high-achieving incoming freshman the same in-state tuition rate offered at Rutgers, a state college. Students who meet criteria for this offer will pay the lower rate for four years, at a savings of nearly $20,000 per school year.

In January 2012, a group of concerned students in California announced its “Fix UC” campaign, which would change the way students pay for college. Under its UC Student Investment Proposal, students could attend a University of California campus at no cost, and after graduation, repay the school a fixed percentage of their income, interest-free, for 20 years. Fix UC hopes to pilot this program with students in its Blue + Gold Opportunity Plan. UC graduates 31,000 of these students every year, who because of academic achievement and financial need, attend college at little to no cost.

But whether such a school repayment plan would work in Indiana is unknown.

Leonard Fromm, associate dean for students and alumni at Indiana University Maurer School of Law, oversees the law school’s Kathleen A. Buck Loan Reduction Assistance Program. He thinks a school would need a significant reserve to test drive the type of program Fix UC proposes.

“The problem is how to transition into such a system,” he said. Without incoming tuition, a school would have to find a way to be sustainable.

“If you’re Harvard, and you have a tremendous endowment, you could decide for a couple of years you’re going to use that endowment during the transition period,” Fromm said. But he did not dismiss the merits of the plan.

“What I like about that idea is that it exhibits creative, outside-the-box type thinking, and I think education at large, and law schools included, need to think about different ways of funding as we go forward,” he said.

Relief for law graduates

fromm Fromm

Fromm said that at graduation, law students sometimes have no choice but to get private loans to help with living expenses as they study for the bar exam.

IU Maurer’s LRAP program aims to help students during that time between graduation and employment, awarding between $2,000 and $6,000 for qualified applicants entering public service positions.

“For the past three years or so, the number of people who have requested LRAP assistance has definitely increased, even though the student body hasn’t increased that much,” Fromm said.

Each year, the school has been able to offer more in LRAP funds, but it still can’t meet the demand.

“Do you try to give it to more people? Or do you try to give funds to less people in higher amounts?” he said.

Bodin administers the John R. Justice Loan Repayment Assistance Program for the state of Indiana. Disbursements may vary from year to year, depending on the number of applicants and the amount of need. Last year, the program helped 79 people, awarding an average of $2,300.

Changes on the horizon

On Feb. 21, Indiana House Bill 1220 passed the Senate and went back to the House with amendments. The bill, sponsored by Sen. Jean Leising, R-Oldenburg, would allow the Indiana Commission for Higher Education to approve or disapprove of both new and existing degree programs that require more than 60 credit hours for an associate’s degree, or more than 120 credit hours for a bachelor’s degree.

Leising contends that some degree programs require students to take up to 141 credit hours, even though student financial aid is available for only eight semesters. Leising said that’s a problem because it leaves some students with no other option than to take out loans to meet the gap in funding.

Around the country, government is beginning to take a more active role in controlling college costs. On Feb. 21, the University of Missouri Board of Curators agreed to increase tuition by only three percent after the governor offered to offset losses by providing the school with proceeds from a nationwide mortgage settlement. The school had been considering a higher rate hike, due to a loss of state funding.

In his State of the Union address Jan. 27, President Barack Obama announced plans to help keep college tuition under control. He proposed shifting federal tuition aid programs away from colleges that fail to keep tuition inflation under control and rewarding those that do control tuition increases.

The president also is asking Congress to freeze current undergraduate federal loan rates at 3.4 percent. Barring action by Congress, that rate will revert to 6.8 percent on July 1.

Take-home advice

Bodin said private student loans have become more common in recent years. Private loans often come with higher, variable interest rates, and some students may mistakenly think that private loans are easier to obtain or result in faster funding. Bodin urges consumers to do their own research before buying into marketing campaigns that push private loans. And, in general, prioritizing expenses has become increasingly important.

“One of the things that student loans are traditionally used for are living expenses,” he said. “It’s just being very conscientious of what the value is you’re going to get out of the degree, and how it is that you can mitigate what you’re borrowing as you go through college.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I have been on this program while on parole from 2011-2013. No person should be forced mentally to share private details of their personal life with total strangers. Also giving permission for a mental therapist to report to your parole agent that your not participating in group therapy because you don't have the financial mean to be in the group therapy. I was personally singled out and sent back three times for not having money and also sent back within the six month when you aren't to be sent according to state law. I will work to het this INSOMM's removed from this state. I also had twelve or thirteen parole agents with a fifteen month period. Thanks for your time.

  2. Our nation produces very few jurists of the caliber of Justice DOUGLAS and his peers these days. Here is that great civil libertarian, who recognized government as both a blessing and, when corrupted by ideological interests, a curse: "Once the investigator has only the conscience of government as a guide, the conscience can become ‘ravenous,’ as Cromwell, bent on destroying Thomas More, said in Bolt, A Man For All Seasons (1960), p. 120. The First Amendment mirrors many episodes where men, harried and harassed by government, sought refuge in their conscience, as these lines of Thomas More show: ‘MORE: And when we stand before God, and you are sent to Paradise for doing according to your conscience, *575 and I am damned for not doing according to mine, will you come with me, for fellowship? ‘CRANMER: So those of us whose names are there are damned, Sir Thomas? ‘MORE: I don't know, Your Grace. I have no window to look into another man's conscience. I condemn no one. ‘CRANMER: Then the matter is capable of question? ‘MORE: Certainly. ‘CRANMER: But that you owe obedience to your King is not capable of question. So weigh a doubt against a certainty—and sign. ‘MORE: Some men think the Earth is round, others think it flat; it is a matter capable of question. But if it is flat, will the King's command make it round? And if it is round, will the King's command flatten it? No, I will not sign.’ Id., pp. 132—133. DOUGLAS THEN WROTE: Where government is the Big Brother,11 privacy gives way to surveillance. **909 But our commitment is otherwise. *576 By the First Amendment we have staked our security on freedom to promote a multiplicity of ideas, to associate at will with kindred spirits, and to defy governmental intrusion into these precincts" Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Comm., 372 U.S. 539, 574-76, 83 S. Ct. 889, 908-09, 9 L. Ed. 2d 929 (1963) Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring. I write: Happy Memorial Day to all -- God please bless our fallen who lived and died to preserve constitutional governance in our wonderful series of Republics. And God open the eyes of those government officials who denounce the constitutions of these Republics by arbitrary actions arising out capricious motives.

  3. From back in the day before secularism got a stranglehold on Hoosier jurists comes this great excerpt via Indiana federal court judge Allan Sharp, dedicated to those many Indiana government attorneys (with whom I have dealt) who count the law as a mere tool, an optional tool that is not to be used when political correctness compels a more acceptable result than merely following the path that the law directs: ALLEN SHARP, District Judge. I. In a scene following a visit by Henry VIII to the home of Sir Thomas More, playwriter Robert Bolt puts the following words into the mouths of his characters: Margaret: Father, that man's bad. MORE: There is no law against that. ROPER: There is! God's law! MORE: Then God can arrest him. ROPER: Sophistication upon sophistication! MORE: No, sheer simplicity. The law, Roper, the law. I know what's legal not what's right. And I'll stick to what's legal. ROPER: Then you set man's law above God's! MORE: No, far below; but let me draw your attention to a fact I'm not God. The currents and eddies of right and wrong, which you find such plain sailing, I can't navigate. I'm no voyager. But in the thickets of law, oh, there I'm a forester. I doubt if there's a man alive who could follow me there, thank God... ALICE: (Exasperated, pointing after Rich) While you talk, he's gone! MORE: And go he should, if he was the Devil himself, until he broke the law! ROPER: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law! MORE: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? ROPER: I'd cut down every law in England to do that! MORE: (Roused and excited) Oh? (Advances on Roper) And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you where would you hide, Roper, the laws being flat? (He leaves *1257 him) This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast man's laws, not God's and if you cut them down and you're just the man to do it d'you really think you would stand upright in the winds that would blow then? (Quietly) Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake. ROPER: I have long suspected this; this is the golden calf; the law's your god. MORE: (Wearily) Oh, Roper, you're a fool, God's my god... (Rather bitterly) But I find him rather too (Very bitterly) subtle... I don't know where he is nor what he wants. ROPER: My God wants service, to the end and unremitting; nothing else! MORE: (Dryly) Are you sure that's God! He sounds like Moloch. But indeed it may be God And whoever hunts for me, Roper, God or Devil, will find me hiding in the thickets of the law! And I'll hide my daughter with me! Not hoist her up the mainmast of your seagoing principles! They put about too nimbly! (Exit More. They all look after him). Pgs. 65-67, A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS A Play in Two Acts, Robert Bolt, Random House, New York, 1960. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, Indianapolis, for defendants. Childs v. Duckworth, 509 F. Supp. 1254, 1256 (N.D. Ind. 1981) aff'd, 705 F.2d 915 (7th Cir. 1983)

  4. "Meanwhile small- and mid-size firms are getting squeezed and likely will not survive unless they become a boutique firm." I've been a business attorney in small, and now mid-size firm for over 30 years, and for over 30 years legal consultants have been preaching this exact same mantra of impending doom for small and mid-sized firms -- verbatim. This claim apparently helps them gin up merger opportunities from smaller firms who become convinced that they need to become larger overnight. The claim that large corporations are interested in cost-saving and efficiency has likewise been preached for decades, and is likewise bunk. If large corporations had any real interest in saving money they wouldn't use large law firms whose rates are substantially higher than those of high-quality mid-sized firms.

  5. The family is the foundation of all human government. That is the Grand Design. Modern governments throw off this Design and make bureaucratic war against the family, as does Hollywood and cultural elitists such as third wave feminists. Since WWII we have been on a ship of fools that way, with both the elite and government and their social engineering hacks relentlessly attacking the very foundation of social order. And their success? See it in the streets of Fergusson, on the food stamp doles (mostly broken families)and in the above article. Reject the Grand Design for true social function, enter the Glorious State to manage social dysfunction. Our Brave New World will be a prison camp, and we will welcome it as the only way to manage given the anarchy without it.

ADVERTISEMENT