ILNews

Possible end of tax credit leaves future renewable energy sources up in the air

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Indiana Lawyer Focus

Newton County lawyer Dan Blaney has a blunt reaction to the potential end of a federal subsidy that has enabled the rise of wind energy in his part of the state. “We’re in trouble,” he said.

Blaney has helped Benton County government, landowners and others in northwest Indiana, where the state’s greatest concentration of wind farms has developed with a big impact on the local economy.

blaney Blaney

But lately, most everything has stopped. Not much wind business is stirring in the Morocco office of Blaney & Walton. “Nobody’s broken any ground or done any construction” on wind turbines in northwest Indiana, he said. “Without that incentive, these wind developers and bankers, they don’t want to get involved.”

In Benton and White counties alone, more than 750 towering turbines are in place across thousands of acres, with a capacity to generate more than 1,000 megawatts of electricity, according to the American Wind Energy Association. That’s sufficient to meet the needs of more than 41,600 homes.

But the federal Renewable Electricity Production Tax Credit for wind energy expires Dec. 31. It provides a federal subsidy of 2.2 cents per kilowatt hour generated for 10 years after a wind turbine is in operation. Most turbines are expected to have a lifespan of at least 30 years.

The looming expiration of the tax credit, meanwhile, is producing a whirlwind of activity at the Wildcat Wind Farm under development north of Elwood in rural Madison and Howard counties. E.ON Climate and Renewables is building the farm, and

communications manager Matt Tulis said the pace of construction is stepped up because the company can only claim the tax credit for turbines that are generating electricity by Dec. 31.

“We’re confident we can get it finished in time,” Tulis said. The $400 million project includes 125 turbines generating up to 200 megawatts of electricity.

But E.ON’s bigger designs for the Wildcat farm are on hold. It had proposed construction of three phases extending across thousands of acres into Tipton and Miami counties. “We are interested in doing more phases in that area. We like the wind resource, we like the transmission availability there,” Tulis said. “The production tax credit will definitely have an influence on future phases.”

Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP partner Mary Solada represents E.ON, and she said without the tax credit, new wind projects are unlikely.

“I think it would decimate the industry,” Solada said. “From everything I’ve heard and read and talked to folks in the industry, the economic model in the industry today assumes the tax credit.”

That model might change in time, but in the current climate, wind power is facing multiple challenges. “It’s kind of like a perfect storm of bad things,” Solada said, listing the expiration of the tax credit, a downturn in manufacturing, and the emergence of inexpensive and abundant natural gas.

“It’s good for consumers, but for people who generate power, it’s not very good,” she said.

Indiana is among the top 15 states in wind power generation, according to the AWEA, and there appears to be bipartisan consensus, at least among some key lawmakers, to extend the credit. Republican Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa, the No. 3 state for wind power, has urged renewal of the tax credit that was signed into law in 1992 by President Bill Clinton and later renewed by President George W. Bush.

“I expect we’ll probably find out at the eleventh hour whether the federal subsidies expire or continue,” said Bob Clark, a partner in the environmental group at Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP in Indianapolis who has worked on wind energy matters.

Indiana Republican Sen. Dan Coats is the lone Hoosier in Congress seated on an energy committee. Spokeswoman Tara DiJulio said, “This is all being looked at in a larger picture with the fiscal cliff package.

“At this time, when it comes to any extension of the credit, (Coats) believes we need to be looking at it as part of reforming the overall tax code,” DiJulio said. “The senator is supportive of alternative and renewable energy, but they must prove themselves to be competitive on their own merits without perpetual federal subsidies.”

solada Solada

Kent Frandsen, an attorney with Parr Richey Obremskey Frandsen & Patterson in Indianapolis, has helped negotiate on behalf of landowners where wind farms were built. He said the expiration of a subsidy was a “theoretical concern” that wouldn’t impact existing farms.

Still, he said the rise of wind power carries complications that should be addressed in leases, and landowners are best served by having numbers on their side to negotiate the best deal and get terms in writing. It also is to the benefit of developers, since they’d prefer not to deal with dozens of leases each with differing terms.

“There are issues that come up that you have to deal with, what you might call after-effects,” Frandsen said. Those range from the impacts of turbines on farming operations to the heavy cranes used to raise the turbines that can crack subterranean drainage tiles.

In the land leases he’s drafted for a group of about 40 landowners in Benton County, he’s tried to address those and other theoretical concerns.

“What happens if the wind company goes out of business 10 or 20 years from now?” he said. “If the government doesn’t continue to subsidize these companies, it seems to me there’s a risk some of these companies will fail, and who will be there to remove them and the six feet of concrete put in the ground to support these turbines?”

To address such concerns, the plant developer agreed with landowners to put money in escrow in case the turbines needed to be removed at a later date, Frandsen said.

Wind energy detractors point to the high cost of turbines, their limited capacity to operate in high winds, and the uneven ability to store or transmit the power they generate. Critics say the subsidy makes the cost of a kilowatt hour of electricity produced by wind generation far more expensive than traditional fossil-fuel electricity generation.

But Blaney, from his vantage point in the small town of Morocco, sees it differently.

“Here’s what it means,” Blaney said. “Each wind tower provides the farmer from $5,000 to $10,000 and up per year.” Some landowners have as many as 27 turbines operating, and their footprint doesn’t remove much acreage from production. “In farming, when times are tough, that would mean the family farm.”

County governments will reap millions in property taxes, even after tax abatements, he said. Steelworkers in Lake County and ancillary businesses around the state benefit and create jobs, he said. “It provides employment in these rural counties, not a large number, but probably 30 to 40 employees in Benton County work in the wind industry.”

Blaney said his understanding is that the federal subsidy covers about 30 percent of the big up-front investment in wind power. That’s not unlike the government aid that other energy sources and infrastructure received at their inception, he said.

He hopes the winds shift again and conditions are favorable to further development of a clean, renewable source of energy. Lately, though, the only such work has been a few agreements with landowners to provide leases if future development occurs.

“I don’t believe the wind industry can be developed without the intervention of the federal government,” Blaney said.•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Indiana's seatbelt law is not punishable as a crime. It is an infraction. Apparently some of our Circuit judges have deemed settled law inapplicable if it fails to fit their litmus test of political correctness. Extrapolating to redefine terms of behavior in a violation of immigration law to the entire body of criminal law leaves a smorgasbord of opportunity for judicial mischief.

  2. I wonder if $10 diversions for failure to wear seat belts are considered moral turpitude in federal immigration law like they are under Indiana law? Anyone know?

  3. What a fine article, thank you! I can testify firsthand and by detailed legal reports (at end of this note) as to the dire consequences of rejecting this truth from the fine article above: "The inclusion and expansion of this right [to jury] in Indiana’s Constitution is a clear reflection of our state’s intention to emphasize the importance of every Hoosier’s right to make their case in front of a jury of their peers." Over $20? Every Hoosier? Well then how about when your very vocation is on the line? How about instead of a jury of peers, one faces a bevy of political appointees, mini-czars, who care less about due process of the law than the real czars did? Instead of trial by jury, trial by ideological ordeal run by Orwellian agents? Well that is built into more than a few administrative law committees of the Ind S.Ct., and it is now being weaponized, as is revealed in articles posted at this ezine, to root out post moderns heresies like refusal to stand and pledge allegiance to all things politically correct. My career was burned at the stake for not so saluting, but I think I was just one of the early logs. Due, at least in part, to the removal of the jury from bar admission and bar discipline cases, many more fires will soon be lit. Perhaps one awaits you, dear heretic? Oh, at that Ind. article 12 plank about a remedy at law for every damage done ... ah, well, the founders evidently meant only for those damages done not by the government itself, rabid statists that they were. (Yes, that was sarcasm.) My written reports available here: Denied petition for cert (this time around): http://tinyurl.com/zdmawmw Denied petition for cert (from the 2009 denial and five year banishment): http://tinyurl.com/zcypybh Related, not written by me: Amicus brief: http://tinyurl.com/hvh7qgp

  4. Justice has finally been served. So glad that Dr. Ley can finally sleep peacefully at night knowing the truth has finally come to the surface.

  5. While this right is guaranteed by our Constitution, it has in recent years been hampered by insurance companies, i.e.; the practice of the plaintiff's own insurance company intervening in an action and filing a lien against any proceeds paid to their insured. In essence, causing an additional financial hurdle for a plaintiff to overcome at trial in terms of overall award. In a very real sense an injured party in exercise of their right to trial by jury may be the only party in a cause that would end up with zero compensation.

ADVERTISEMENT