ILNews

President nominates former Indiana attorney

Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

President Barack Obama has nominated a former Indiana lawyer as well as a former Indiana representative and gubernatorial candidate for roles in his administration. Both positions must receive Senate confirmation. 

Following an announcement Thursday, Obama sent a nomination to the U.S. Senate for Anne Slaughter Andrew to be the nation's ambassador to Costa Rica within the Department of State. He also nominated former gubernatorial candidate Jill Long Thompson to be a member of the Farm Credit Administration Board. Both positions must receive Senate confirmation.

In a statement, the president said, "I appreciate the dedication and expertise that these individuals have shown throughout their careers, and I am confident that they will show the same commitment in these new roles."

Andrew is the principal of Washington, D.C.-based New Energy Nexus LLC, where she advises companies and entrepreneurs about ways to capitalize on this new energy economy. She's worked with environmental groups for years, including the Nature Conservancy since 1995, the Sierra Club, and the Indiana Natural Resources Foundation. She also co-founded a medical bio-tech consulting company called the Anson Group in 2004.

An attorney who earned her degree from Indiana University School of Law - Indianapolis, Andrew has also advised companies in corporate environmental and energy practices. She also served as of counsel at Bingham McHale, co-chair of the Environment/Energy Team at Baker & Daniels, and was a partner at the Washington, D.C., law office of Patton & Boggs.

She is also the wife of former state and national Democratic Party Chairman Joe Andrew, who gave a key endorsement to Obama during last year's presidential primary.

Thompson, a former U.S. House of Representatives member for three terms, would take a post on an independent federal agency that examines and regulates agricultural lending institutions. After leaving Congress, she served as the former Under Secretary for Rural Development at the U.S. Department of Agriculture during President Bill Clinton's presidency. She ran against Gov. Mitch Daniels during last year's election.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Indianapolis employers harassment among minorities AFRICAN Americans needs to be discussed the metro Indianapolis area is horrible when it comes to harassing African American employees especially in the local healthcare facilities. Racially profiling in the workplace is an major issue. Please make it better because I'm many civil rights leaders would come here and justify that Indiana is a state the WORKS only applies to Caucasian Americans especially in Hamilton county. Indiana targets African Americans in the workplace so when governor pence is trying to convince people to vote for him this would be awesome publicity for the Presidency Elections.

  2. Wishing Mary Willis only God's best, and superhuman strength, as she attempts to right a ship that too often strays far off course. May she never suffer this personal affect, as some do who attempt to change a broken system: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QojajMsd2nE

  3. Indiana's seatbelt law is not punishable as a crime. It is an infraction. Apparently some of our Circuit judges have deemed settled law inapplicable if it fails to fit their litmus test of political correctness. Extrapolating to redefine terms of behavior in a violation of immigration law to the entire body of criminal law leaves a smorgasbord of opportunity for judicial mischief.

  4. I wonder if $10 diversions for failure to wear seat belts are considered moral turpitude in federal immigration law like they are under Indiana law? Anyone know?

  5. What a fine article, thank you! I can testify firsthand and by detailed legal reports (at end of this note) as to the dire consequences of rejecting this truth from the fine article above: "The inclusion and expansion of this right [to jury] in Indiana’s Constitution is a clear reflection of our state’s intention to emphasize the importance of every Hoosier’s right to make their case in front of a jury of their peers." Over $20? Every Hoosier? Well then how about when your very vocation is on the line? How about instead of a jury of peers, one faces a bevy of political appointees, mini-czars, who care less about due process of the law than the real czars did? Instead of trial by jury, trial by ideological ordeal run by Orwellian agents? Well that is built into more than a few administrative law committees of the Ind S.Ct., and it is now being weaponized, as is revealed in articles posted at this ezine, to root out post moderns heresies like refusal to stand and pledge allegiance to all things politically correct. My career was burned at the stake for not so saluting, but I think I was just one of the early logs. Due, at least in part, to the removal of the jury from bar admission and bar discipline cases, many more fires will soon be lit. Perhaps one awaits you, dear heretic? Oh, at that Ind. article 12 plank about a remedy at law for every damage done ... ah, well, the founders evidently meant only for those damages done not by the government itself, rabid statists that they were. (Yes, that was sarcasm.) My written reports available here: Denied petition for cert (this time around): http://tinyurl.com/zdmawmw Denied petition for cert (from the 2009 denial and five year banishment): http://tinyurl.com/zcypybh Related, not written by me: Amicus brief: http://tinyurl.com/hvh7qgp

ADVERTISEMENT