ILNews

President nominates former Indiana attorney

Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

President Barack Obama has nominated a former Indiana lawyer as well as a former Indiana representative and gubernatorial candidate for roles in his administration. Both positions must receive Senate confirmation. 

Following an announcement Thursday, Obama sent a nomination to the U.S. Senate for Anne Slaughter Andrew to be the nation's ambassador to Costa Rica within the Department of State. He also nominated former gubernatorial candidate Jill Long Thompson to be a member of the Farm Credit Administration Board. Both positions must receive Senate confirmation.

In a statement, the president said, "I appreciate the dedication and expertise that these individuals have shown throughout their careers, and I am confident that they will show the same commitment in these new roles."

Andrew is the principal of Washington, D.C.-based New Energy Nexus LLC, where she advises companies and entrepreneurs about ways to capitalize on this new energy economy. She's worked with environmental groups for years, including the Nature Conservancy since 1995, the Sierra Club, and the Indiana Natural Resources Foundation. She also co-founded a medical bio-tech consulting company called the Anson Group in 2004.

An attorney who earned her degree from Indiana University School of Law - Indianapolis, Andrew has also advised companies in corporate environmental and energy practices. She also served as of counsel at Bingham McHale, co-chair of the Environment/Energy Team at Baker & Daniels, and was a partner at the Washington, D.C., law office of Patton & Boggs.

She is also the wife of former state and national Democratic Party Chairman Joe Andrew, who gave a key endorsement to Obama during last year's presidential primary.

Thompson, a former U.S. House of Representatives member for three terms, would take a post on an independent federal agency that examines and regulates agricultural lending institutions. After leaving Congress, she served as the former Under Secretary for Rural Development at the U.S. Department of Agriculture during President Bill Clinton's presidency. She ran against Gov. Mitch Daniels during last year's election.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT