ILNews

Pro bono efforts reflect culture of southwestern Indiana attorneys

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

When the pro se litigants approached the bench in the Vanderburgh County family law court, they often asked the judge for legal advice. They did not have the money to hire a lawyer so when they had legal questions, the litigants naturally turned to the judge, the only resource they had available.

The Volunteer Lawyer Program of Southwestern Indiana, serving the counties clustered in the lower corner of the state, decided to offer some help. That decision came during the worst of the economic recession when not only were many households struggling, but the funding for pro bono programs was withering.

sw-probono-15col.jpg Attorneys Beverly Corn (left) and Scott Wylie champion pro bono legal assistance. (Photo by David Greene, DIA Photography)

Though times were tough – but because times were tough – the Volunteer Lawyer Program moved forward with the new initiative. Led by then co-chair of the program, Vanderburgh Superior Judge Wayne Trockman, the VLP developed a family law clinic to offer assistance to these pro se litigants.

Now, two afternoons a month, local attorneys answer questions, explain the legal process, give advice and help fill out forms for the individuals and families going into family court.

Trockman called the clinic a success. The feedback has been positive, and many individuals have received the help they needed.

He attributed the reason for the clinic’s accomplishment to the same reason that underlies the achievements of the pro bono program overall – the culture of the legal community in southwestern Indiana.

“The volunteers are very diverse. They don’t come from one group. They come from all segments of the bar,” Trockman said. “The attorneys in our district really care and, at least for me, it shows in the abundance of participation.”

Sitting recently at the conference table in the small office from which the VLP is run, Beverly Corn, plan administrator, and Scott Wylie, co-administrator/program director, also linked the program’s success to the culture of the region’s attorneys.

A reflection of the legal community’s commitment comes during Evansville’s Law Day celebration. The day begins with the local attorneys reciting the Indiana Oath of Attorneys. The last clause of that oath speaks to not forsaking the poor and to the attorneys’ obligation to not turn away people from justice.

That sentiment, say Wylie and Corn, is deeply engrained among the attorneys in the district.

“I sleep at night because I know that I’m working with attorneys and individuals who have a belief that we do what we can to help those that we can,” Corn said. “We do what we do because we are who we are.”

Needing more, having less

Doing what they could became more difficult during the economic recession. Also known as Pro Bono District K, covering Evansville and the surrounding counties, the program has faced budget cuts like other districts across the state. And on top of the belt tightening, the district grew bigger.

In 2008, the pro bono programs were hitting their stride, said Wylie, who recently became a member of the Pro Bono Commission. Every district had a program, and all programs were fully incorporated, doing high-quality work.

Then the economy stumbled and interest rates dropped. With the pro bono districts subsisting on funds from the Interest on Lawyer Trust Account program, the market upheaval ushered in deep cutbacks and painful choices.

The Volunteer Lawyer Program of Southwestern Indiana was allotted $156,000 in 2007-2008, according to Corn. For the last three years, the program has received $86,330. And when the Pro Bono Commission consolidated the number of districts from 14 to 12, the VLP picked up Sullivan and Vigo counties.

Wylie applauded the work of the commission in steering the districts through the economic recession. The consolidation helped redistribute resources to keep the staff attorneys who were already in place.

In turn, when the interest rates rise and the money comes back, he said, the institutional knowledge will still be available so the programs will be viable and not have to be rebuilt from scratch.

When the district expanded, Corn traveled the 125 miles to Terre Haute to introduce herself to the local bar association. In the audience that day was Derek Conner, a young attorney at Wright Shagley & Lowery P.C. in Terre Haute.

After hearing Corn speak, he volunteered his help.

Conner currently serves as the Vigo County representatives for the Volunteer Lawyer Program. The cases land in his inbox, and then he sends out a mass email to 100 or more attorneys in the area, looking for someone to offer their services. Usually, the responses come quickly, and the cases get picked up.

“I feel like we’ve got a base of attorneys who are willing to give people some of their time,” Conner said.

In fact, he said the pro bono effort in his community could handle more cases. Knowing what his hometown has been through economically, Conner worries that residents are going without legal services because they do not realize help is available for free.

Those who come for pro bono legal assistance in Terre Haute are no different than people in other parts of the district. Many have low-paying jobs and after they cover food and rent, little is left over. A landlord-tenant dispute, a divorce or custody matter can send them to court without a lawyer.

“People are poor for a reason,” Wylie said. “No one wants to be poor. They’re poor because they didn’t get the love to have a wonderful education or they weren’t blessed with parents who were able to steward them through education or provide them an inheritance or whatever helps all the rest of us get jobs. They get outcompeted at McDonald’s.”

Finding alternatives

At the Volunteer Lawyer Program, the administrators dealt with the cuts by distilling its work down to core functions such as placement of cases, and increased alternative services like clinics and self-help materials.

This is done, Wylie said, so they can funnel the tough cases, the people who truly need legal representation, to attorneys like Jean Blanton of Ziemer Stayman Weitzel & Shoulders LLP.

Since she stared practicing about nine years ago, Blanton has always worked on at least one active case from the VLP. Focusing on family law, she has handled a custody battle that included a day-and-a-half trial, and she has taken two cases on appeal.

Family law cases can be emotional and stressful, she acknowledged, but when she goes to the county courts building, she sees the individuals who have to maneuver through the system by themselves because they cannot afford an attorney.

“We can’t help everyone,” she said, “but everything we do makes a difference.”

Sometimes that difference comes in the simple legal matters.

The VLP organized a “wills clinic” for the clients at the community mental health center in Vanderburgh County. These individuals live on a monthly income of $674 from Social Security. This is certainly not a lot of money but when they die without a will, their survivors cannot access their last check.

At first, the clients entering the clinic area were leery and extremely shy, Corn remembered. She had arranged the clinic space to mirror an actual law office, with a receptionist to greet the clients and introduce them to their attorney.

Walking out the door at the end of the process, the clients had their heads high, smiling and were clutching their wills.

“There was not a dry eye in the place because of the work,” Corn said. “This is why we do what we do.”•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • concerned grandma
    i have tried ti find a pro bono for my son we live in bedford indiana but we cant find any help we cant afford a high priced attorney and my grandson is going through abuse but even cps wont do anything can you tell me how to get help

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. He called our nation a nation of cowards because we didn't want to talk about race. That was a cheap shot coming from the top cop. The man who decides who gets the federal government indicts. Wow. Not a gentleman if that is the measure. More importantly, this insult delivered as we all understand, to white people-- without him or anybody needing to explain that is precisely what he meant-- but this is an insult to timid white persons who fear the government and don't want to say anything about race for fear of being accused a racist. With all the legal heat that can come down on somebody if they say something which can be construed by a prosecutor like Mr Holder as racist, is it any wonder white people-- that's who he meant obviously-- is there any surprise that white people don't want to talk about race? And as lawyers we have even less freedom lest our remarks be considered violations of the rules. Mr Holder also demonstrated his bias by publically visiting with the family of the young man who was killed by a police offering in the line of duty, which was a very strong indicator of bias agains the offer who is under investigation, and was a failure to lead properly by letting his investigators do their job without him predetermining the proper outcome. He also has potentially biased the jury pool. All in all this worsens race relations by feeding into the perception shared by whites as well as blacks that justice will not be impartial. I will say this much, I do not blame Obama for all of HOlder's missteps. Obama has done a lot of things to stay above the fray and try and be a leader for all Americans. Maybe he should have reigned Holder in some but Obama's got his hands full with other problelms. Oh did I mention HOlder is a bank crony who will probably get a job in a silkstocking law firm working for millions of bucks a year defending bankers whom he didn't have the integrity or courage to hold to account for their acts of fraud on the United States, other financial institutions, and the people. His tenure will be regarded by history as a failure of leadership at one of the most important jobs in our nation. Finally and most importantly besides him insulting the public and letting off the big financial cheats, he has been at the forefront of over-prosecuting the secrecy laws to punish whistleblowers and chill free speech. What has Holder done to vindicate the rights of privacy of the American public against the illegal snooping of the NSA? He could have charged NSA personnel with violations of law for their warrantless wiretapping which has been done millions of times and instead he did not persecute a single soul. That is a defalcation of historical proportions and it signals to the public that the government DOJ under him was not willing to do a damn thing to protect the public against the rapid growth of the illegal surveillance state. Who else could have done this? Nobody. And for that omission Obama deserves the blame too. Here were are sliding into a police state and Eric Holder made it go all the faster.

  2. JOE CLAYPOOL candidate for Superior Court in Harrison County - Indiana This candidate is misleading voters to think he is a Judge by putting Elect Judge Joe Claypool on his campaign literature. paragraphs 2 and 9 below clearly indicate this injustice to voting public to gain employment. What can we do? Indiana Code - Section 35-43-5-3: Deception (a) A person who: (1) being an officer, manager, or other person participating in the direction of a credit institution, knowingly or intentionally receives or permits the receipt of a deposit or other investment, knowing that the institution is insolvent; (2) knowingly or intentionally makes a false or misleading written statement with intent to obtain property, employment, or an educational opportunity; (3) misapplies entrusted property, property of a governmental entity, or property of a credit institution in a manner that the person knows is unlawful or that the person knows involves substantial risk of loss or detriment to either the owner of the property or to a person for whose benefit the property was entrusted; (4) knowingly or intentionally, in the regular course of business, either: (A) uses or possesses for use a false weight or measure or other device for falsely determining or recording the quality or quantity of any commodity; or (B) sells, offers, or displays for sale or delivers less than the represented quality or quantity of any commodity; (5) with intent to defraud another person furnishing electricity, gas, water, telecommunication, or any other utility service, avoids a lawful charge for that service by scheme or device or by tampering with facilities or equipment of the person furnishing the service; (6) with intent to defraud, misrepresents the identity of the person or another person or the identity or quality of property; (7) with intent to defraud an owner of a coin machine, deposits a slug in that machine; (8) with intent to enable the person or another person to deposit a slug in a coin machine, makes, possesses, or disposes of a slug; (9) disseminates to the public an advertisement that the person knows is false, misleading, or deceptive, with intent to promote the purchase or sale of property or the acceptance of employment;

  3. The story that you have shared is quite interesting and also the information is very helpful. Thanks for sharing the article. For more info: http://www.treasurecoastbailbonds.com/

  4. I grew up on a farm and live in the county and it's interesting that the big industrial farmers like Jeff Shoaf don't live next to their industrial operations...

  5. So that none are misinformed by my posting wihtout a non de plume here, please allow me to state that I am NOT an Indiana licensed attorney, although I am an Indiana resident approved to practice law and represent clients in Indiana's fed court of Nth Dist and before the 7th circuit. I remain licensed in KS, since 1996, no discipline. This must be clarified since the IN court records will reveal that I did sit for and pass the Indiana bar last February. Yet be not confused by the fact that I was so allowed to be tested .... I am not, to be clear in the service of my duty to be absolutely candid about this, I AM NOT a member of the Indiana bar, and might never be so licensed given my unrepented from errors of thought documented in this opinion, at fn2, which likely supports Mr Smith's initial post in this thread: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1592921.html

ADVERTISEMENT