ILNews

Pro bono efforts reflect culture of southwestern Indiana attorneys

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

When the pro se litigants approached the bench in the Vanderburgh County family law court, they often asked the judge for legal advice. They did not have the money to hire a lawyer so when they had legal questions, the litigants naturally turned to the judge, the only resource they had available.

The Volunteer Lawyer Program of Southwestern Indiana, serving the counties clustered in the lower corner of the state, decided to offer some help. That decision came during the worst of the economic recession when not only were many households struggling, but the funding for pro bono programs was withering.

sw-probono-15col.jpg Attorneys Beverly Corn (left) and Scott Wylie champion pro bono legal assistance. (Photo by David Greene, DIA Photography)

Though times were tough – but because times were tough – the Volunteer Lawyer Program moved forward with the new initiative. Led by then co-chair of the program, Vanderburgh Superior Judge Wayne Trockman, the VLP developed a family law clinic to offer assistance to these pro se litigants.

Now, two afternoons a month, local attorneys answer questions, explain the legal process, give advice and help fill out forms for the individuals and families going into family court.

Trockman called the clinic a success. The feedback has been positive, and many individuals have received the help they needed.

He attributed the reason for the clinic’s accomplishment to the same reason that underlies the achievements of the pro bono program overall – the culture of the legal community in southwestern Indiana.

“The volunteers are very diverse. They don’t come from one group. They come from all segments of the bar,” Trockman said. “The attorneys in our district really care and, at least for me, it shows in the abundance of participation.”

Sitting recently at the conference table in the small office from which the VLP is run, Beverly Corn, plan administrator, and Scott Wylie, co-administrator/program director, also linked the program’s success to the culture of the region’s attorneys.

A reflection of the legal community’s commitment comes during Evansville’s Law Day celebration. The day begins with the local attorneys reciting the Indiana Oath of Attorneys. The last clause of that oath speaks to not forsaking the poor and to the attorneys’ obligation to not turn away people from justice.

That sentiment, say Wylie and Corn, is deeply engrained among the attorneys in the district.

“I sleep at night because I know that I’m working with attorneys and individuals who have a belief that we do what we can to help those that we can,” Corn said. “We do what we do because we are who we are.”

Needing more, having less

Doing what they could became more difficult during the economic recession. Also known as Pro Bono District K, covering Evansville and the surrounding counties, the program has faced budget cuts like other districts across the state. And on top of the belt tightening, the district grew bigger.

In 2008, the pro bono programs were hitting their stride, said Wylie, who recently became a member of the Pro Bono Commission. Every district had a program, and all programs were fully incorporated, doing high-quality work.

Then the economy stumbled and interest rates dropped. With the pro bono districts subsisting on funds from the Interest on Lawyer Trust Account program, the market upheaval ushered in deep cutbacks and painful choices.

The Volunteer Lawyer Program of Southwestern Indiana was allotted $156,000 in 2007-2008, according to Corn. For the last three years, the program has received $86,330. And when the Pro Bono Commission consolidated the number of districts from 14 to 12, the VLP picked up Sullivan and Vigo counties.

Wylie applauded the work of the commission in steering the districts through the economic recession. The consolidation helped redistribute resources to keep the staff attorneys who were already in place.

In turn, when the interest rates rise and the money comes back, he said, the institutional knowledge will still be available so the programs will be viable and not have to be rebuilt from scratch.

When the district expanded, Corn traveled the 125 miles to Terre Haute to introduce herself to the local bar association. In the audience that day was Derek Conner, a young attorney at Wright Shagley & Lowery P.C. in Terre Haute.

After hearing Corn speak, he volunteered his help.

Conner currently serves as the Vigo County representatives for the Volunteer Lawyer Program. The cases land in his inbox, and then he sends out a mass email to 100 or more attorneys in the area, looking for someone to offer their services. Usually, the responses come quickly, and the cases get picked up.

“I feel like we’ve got a base of attorneys who are willing to give people some of their time,” Conner said.

In fact, he said the pro bono effort in his community could handle more cases. Knowing what his hometown has been through economically, Conner worries that residents are going without legal services because they do not realize help is available for free.

Those who come for pro bono legal assistance in Terre Haute are no different than people in other parts of the district. Many have low-paying jobs and after they cover food and rent, little is left over. A landlord-tenant dispute, a divorce or custody matter can send them to court without a lawyer.

“People are poor for a reason,” Wylie said. “No one wants to be poor. They’re poor because they didn’t get the love to have a wonderful education or they weren’t blessed with parents who were able to steward them through education or provide them an inheritance or whatever helps all the rest of us get jobs. They get outcompeted at McDonald’s.”

Finding alternatives

At the Volunteer Lawyer Program, the administrators dealt with the cuts by distilling its work down to core functions such as placement of cases, and increased alternative services like clinics and self-help materials.

This is done, Wylie said, so they can funnel the tough cases, the people who truly need legal representation, to attorneys like Jean Blanton of Ziemer Stayman Weitzel & Shoulders LLP.

Since she stared practicing about nine years ago, Blanton has always worked on at least one active case from the VLP. Focusing on family law, she has handled a custody battle that included a day-and-a-half trial, and she has taken two cases on appeal.

Family law cases can be emotional and stressful, she acknowledged, but when she goes to the county courts building, she sees the individuals who have to maneuver through the system by themselves because they cannot afford an attorney.

“We can’t help everyone,” she said, “but everything we do makes a difference.”

Sometimes that difference comes in the simple legal matters.

The VLP organized a “wills clinic” for the clients at the community mental health center in Vanderburgh County. These individuals live on a monthly income of $674 from Social Security. This is certainly not a lot of money but when they die without a will, their survivors cannot access their last check.

At first, the clients entering the clinic area were leery and extremely shy, Corn remembered. She had arranged the clinic space to mirror an actual law office, with a receptionist to greet the clients and introduce them to their attorney.

Walking out the door at the end of the process, the clients had their heads high, smiling and were clutching their wills.

“There was not a dry eye in the place because of the work,” Corn said. “This is why we do what we do.”•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • concerned grandma
    i have tried ti find a pro bono for my son we live in bedford indiana but we cant find any help we cant afford a high priced attorney and my grandson is going through abuse but even cps wont do anything can you tell me how to get help

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Call it unauthorized law if you must, a regulatory wrong, but it was fraud and theft well beyond that, a seeming crime! "In three specific cases, the hearing officer found that Westerfield did little to no work for her clients but only issued a partial refund or no refund at all." That is theft by deception, folks. "In its decision to suspend Westerfield, the Supreme Court noted that she already had a long disciplinary history dating back to 1996 and had previously been suspended in 2004 and indefinitely suspended in 2005. She was reinstated in 2009 after finally giving the commission a response to the grievance for which she was suspended in 2004." WOW -- was the Indiana Supreme Court complicit in her fraud? Talk about being on notice of a real bad actor .... "Further, the justices noted that during her testimony, Westerfield was “disingenuous and evasive” about her relationship with Tope and attempted to distance herself from him. They also wrote that other aggravating factors existed in Westerfield’s case, such as her lack of remorse." WOW, and yet she only got 18 months on the bench, and if she shows up and cries for them in a year and a half, and pays money to JLAP for group therapy ... back in to ride roughshod over hapless clients (or are they "marks") once again! Aint Hoosier lawyering a great money making adventure!!! Just live for the bucks, even if filthy lucre, and come out a-ok. ME on the other hand??? Lifetime banishment for blowing the whistle on unconstitutional governance. Yes, had I ripped off clients or had ANY disciplinary history for doing that I would have fared better, most likely, as that it would have revealed me motivated by Mammon and not Faith. Check it out if you doubt my reading of this, compare and contrast the above 18 months with my lifetime banishment from court, see appendix for Bar Examiners report which the ISC adopted without substantive review: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS

  2. Wow, over a quarter million dollars? That is a a lot of commissary money! Over what time frame? Years I would guess. Anyone ever try to blow the whistle? Probably not, since most Hoosiers who take notice of such things realize that Hoosier whistleblowers are almost always pilloried. If someone did blow the whistle, they were likely fired. The persecution of whistleblowers is a sure sign of far too much government corruption. Details of my own personal experience at the top of Hoosier governance available upon request ... maybe a "fake news" media outlet will have the courage to tell the stories of Hoosier whistleblowers that the "real" Hoosier media (cough) will not deign to touch. (They are part of the problem.)

  3. So if I am reading it right, only if and when African American college students agree to receive checks labeling them as "Negroes" do they receive aid from the UNCF or the Quaker's Educational Fund? In other words, to borrow from the Indiana Appellate Court, "the [nonprofit] supposed to be [their] advocate, refers to [students] in a racially offensive manner. While there is no evidence that [the nonprofits] intended harm to [African American students], the harm was nonetheless inflicted. [Black students are] presented to [academia and future employers] in a racially offensive manner. For these reasons, [such] performance [is] deficient and also prejudice[ial]." Maybe even DEPLORABLE???

  4. I'm the poor soul who spent over 10 years in prison with many many other prisoners trying to kill me for being charged with a sex offense THAT I DID NOT COMMIT i was in jail for a battery charge for helping a friend leave a boyfriend who beat her I've been saying for over 28 years that i did not and would never hurt a child like that mine or anybody's child but NOBODY wants to believe that i might not be guilty of this horrible crime or think that when i say that ALL the paperwork concerning my conviction has strangely DISAPPEARED or even when the long beach judge re-sentenced me over 14 months on a already filed plea bargain out of another districts court then had it filed under a fake name so i could not find while trying to fight my conviction on appeal in a nut shell people are ALWAYS quick to believe the worst about some one well I DID NOT HURT ANY CHILD EVER IN MY LIFE AND HAVE SAID THIS FOR ALMOST 30 YEARS please if anybody can me get some kind of justice it would be greatly appreciated respectfully written wrongly accused Brian Valenti

  5. A high ranking Indiana supreme Court operative caught red handed leading a group using the uber offensive N word! She must denounce or be denounced! (Or not since she is an insider ... rules do not apply to them). Evidence here: http://m.indianacompanies.us/friends-educational-fund-for-negroes.364110.company.v2#top_info

ADVERTISEMENT