Pro bono reporting results draw mixed reaction

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The first round of data collected from Indiana’s new pro bono reporting rule invoked opposing reactions among the members of the Coalition for Court Access who recently reviewed the numbers. Some thought the amount of time and money lawyers donated to legal aid was shameful, while others were thrilled with the level of giving.

At its April 25 meeting at the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, the CCA took time to examine the reporting rule information and discuss how to present the data to the public. Being just the first year, drawing inferences from the numbers is difficult, but Scott Wylie, member of the CCA pro bono working group, said the numbers provide a start.

“One year gives us a baseline as to whether or not the efforts by the CCA and other folks is moving the bar on getting people to do pro bono,” Wylie said.

Indiana amended its Rules of Professional Conduct in 2014 to include a mandatory pro bono reporting requirement. When lawyers renewed their licenses in 2016, they had to include any hours they provided legal services to the indigent and any financial contributions they made to legal aid agencies during the 2015 calendar year.

hours-table.gifThe numbers show less than 50 percent of Indiana attorneys in 2015 gave their time to helping clients who either could not pay anything or could only pay a greatly reduced rate. Of the 15,544 Hoosier lawyers covered by the reporting rule, 41 percent donated only their time. Adding in the 896 attorneys who gave both time and money, that total bumps up to 47 percent.

Joel Schumm, director of experiential learning at IU McKinney, pointed out percentage does not reflect well on the legal profession. The general public, he noted, will be able to see that 59 percent of practicing attorneys did not donate any time.

Others called the 41 percent “pathetic,” and asked if the goal behind publicizing the data was to shame attorneys into taking on pro bono work.

“I’m not necessarily thrilled with it,” said Indiana Supreme Court Justice Steven David, chair of the CCA. “… Personally, I think we would all like this to be 80 percent, but it’s not. This is one part of serving the unmet needs.”

However, Wylie, director of the Volunteer Lawyer Program of Southwestern Indiana, had a different view. He noted these numbers put Indiana in the mainstream compared to other states.

All the other states have reporting rules similar to Indiana’s, although not all are mandatory, and the level of attorney participation in donating hours generally ranges from 45 to 55 percent. Data from 2013 collected by the American Bar Association show that of the states where pro bono reporting is required, Florida had a participation rate of 51 percent, Maryland had 57 percent and Illinois had 34 percent.

“In reality, I was actually surprised (the number) was as high as it was,” Wylie said. “Considering we were 50th to come to IOLTA and we were the last state in the nation to really start pro bono work, I took this as very positive.”

Indiana’s mandatory reporting rule stirred controversy when it was being implemented. Some in the legal community believed it was the first step toward requiring pro bono service. But the Indiana Supreme Court maintained the sole purpose of the rule is to get an idea of the level of pro bono service in the state.

The grumbling is not believed to have induced attorneys to purposefully misreport. If anything, lawyers may have underreported their donations. Charles Dunlap, executive director of the Indiana Bar Foundation, which oversees the state’s pro bono districts, speculated some lawyers may have been unsure how much pro bono work they did, so, not wanting to perjure themselves, they included only the hours they could document.

Under the rule, attorneys can also list the monetary donations they made to legal aid organizations. A total of $775,122 was given in 2015, along with $281,953 of in-kind donations of property such as computers and office furniture, according to the data.

Again, of the 15,544 attorneys not exempted from the rule, 1,371 made financial contributions (this includes the 475 who donated only money and the 896 who gave time and money). The average monetary donation was $565.37.

Some on the CCA thought the dollar amount was high and wondered if there was a way to audit that by looking at the contributions the legal aid organizations received in 2015. David said he was unsure if there was any way to do an audit or even if there was any interest in doing some kind of verification.•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. File under the Sociology of Hoosier Discipline ... “We will be answering the complaint in due course and defending against the commission’s allegations,” said Indianapolis attorney Don Lundberg, who’s representing Hudson in her disciplinary case. FOR THOSE WHO DO NOT KNOW ... Lundberg ran the statist attorney disciplinary machinery in Indy for decades, and is now the "go to guy" for those who can afford him .... the ultimate insider for the well-to-do and/or connected who find themselves in the crosshairs. It would appear that this former prosecutor knows how the game is played in Circle City ... and is sacrificing accordingly. See more on that here ... Legal sociologists could have a field day here ... I wonder why such things are never studied? Is a sacrifice to the well connected former regulators a de facto bribe? Such questions, if probed, could bring about a more just world, a more equal playing field, less Stalinist governance. All of the things that our preambles tell us to value could be advanced if only sunshine reached into such dark worlds. As a great jurist once wrote: "Publicity is justly commended as a remedy for social and industrial diseases. Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants; electric light the most efficient policeman." Other People's Money—and How Bankers Use It (1914). Ah, but I am certifiable, according to the Indiana authorities, according to the ISC it can be read, for believing such trite things and for advancing such unwanted thoughts. As a great albeit fictional and broken resistance leaders once wrote: "I am the dead." Winston Smith Let us all be dead to the idea of maintaining a patently unjust legal order.

  2. The Department of Education still has over $100 million of ITT Education Services money in the form of $100+ million Letters of Credit. That money was supposed to be used by The DOE to help students. The DOE did nothing to help students. The DOE essentially stole the money from ITT Tech and still has the money. The trustee should be going after the DOE to get the money back for people who are owed that money, including shareholders.

  3. Do you know who the sponsor of the last-minute amendment was?

  4. Law firms of over 50 don't deliver good value, thats what this survey really tells you. Anybody that has seen what they bill for compared to what they deliver knows that already, however.

  5. My husband left me and the kids for 2 years, i did everything humanly possible to get him back i prayed i even fasted nothing worked out. i was so diver-stated, i was left with nothing no money to pay for kids up keep. my life was tearing apart. i head that he was trying to get married to another lady in Italy, i look for urgent help then i found Dr.Mack in the internet by accident, i was skeptical because i don’t really believe he can bring husband back because its too long we have contacted each other, we only comment on each other status on Facebook and when ever he come online he has never talks anything about coming back to me, i really had to give Dr.Mack a chance to help me out, luckily for me he was God sent and has made everything like a dream to me, Dr.Mack told me that everything will be fine, i called him and he assured me that my Husband will return, i was having so many doubt but now i am happy,i can’t believe it my husband broke up with his Italian lady and he is now back to me and he can’t even stay a minute without me, all he said to me was that he want me back, i am really happy and i cried so much because it was unbelievable, i am really happy and my entire family are happy for me but they never know whats the secret behind this…i want you all divorce lady or single mother, unhappy relationship to please contact this man for help and everything will be fine i really guarantee you….if you want to contact him you can reach him through dr.mac@yahoo. com..,