Over the next three years, a professor at an Indiana law school will be working on a study of India’s trial courts
as part of a $261,000 grant from the Ford Foundation to a non-governmental association based in India.
Jayanth Krishnan of Indiana University Maurer School of Law – Bloomington, a professor and head of the India Initiative
at the school’s Center on the Global Legal Profession, will be the project director for the study that will look at
district courts in Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Himachal Pradesh, as well as forums for alternative dispute resolution in India.
In a press release the law school issued Thursday, Krishnan said that between 30,000 and 40,000 cases are pending before
the Supreme Court of India and in the lower courts the number is likely in the tens of millions.
Krishnan has been traveling and was unable to answer questions in time for today’s deadline. However, during an interview
for an article about the law school’s work with India for the Sept. 2-15, 2009, edition of Indiana Lawyer,
Krishnan said it was considered typical for a case in India to last 10 years, and some cases last as long as 30 years.
He said there weren’t many options for the average Indian other than to wait it out, and that the backlog for cases
has gotten so bad that it is just accepted that cases will take a long time to be resolved.
A year ago he also said there was little empirical research available about ADR in India, but the country’s government
had been considering it as one solution to the backlog in the courts, and had been providing forums for ADR.
The National Centre for Advocacy Studies, which
received the grant from the Ford Foundation for the 3-year study, is based in the state of Maharashtra, India. That organization
is partnering with two other human rights organizations in India that focus on access to justice issues: the Centre for Social Justice, and Jagori Grameen.
Krishnan’s work with the study will contribute to the school’s Center on the Global Legal Profession, which includes internships and other partnerships with law schools
and legal systems, such as China and South Korea.
A more in-depth article about Krishnan’s work with the study and the Center on the Global Legal Profession will appear
in a future print edition of Indiana Lawyer.














With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...