ILNews

Project honoring retired chief justice is exceeding expectations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The art project to honor retired Indiana Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard is continuing to draw contributions as the unveiling of the winning design nears.  

Initiated by the inaugural class of the Indiana State Bar Association Leadership Development Academy, the project is working to create an original piece of interactive art that will be displayed in the new Bicentennial Park in Evansville, Shepard’s hometown. Along with commemorating Shepard’s years of public service, the work is supposed to be something that youngsters can play on and around.  

The project’s steering committee issued a call last fall to students and faculty in colleges and universities around the state to submit ideas. A total of five proposals were turned in but Casey Kannenberg, LDA graduate and member of the steering committee, said despite the low number, the quality of the designs was exceptional.

“The committee was very impressed,” Kannenberg said. “The level of creativity and skill was at or exceeded expectations.”

The committee narrowed the selections down to two and asked the finalists to make some changes then resubmit their designs by Feb. 1. Shortly thereafter, the winner will be announced and the design unveiled.

Originally, the LDA class was hoping to have the artwork installed by the time the Bicentennial Park was opened July 4. However, the construction of the downtown park has been delayed so the artwork’s completion date has been pushed back as well.

Both the park and the artwork are expected to be competed this year.

The materials used to build the piece will be upgraded thanks to a boom in fundraising. To date, the project has raised over $40,000, nearly doubling its initial goal of $25,000.

Contributions are coming from a variety of sources. The LDA class has focused its fundraising efforts on the Evansville community, asking businesses and law firms for their support. The class is hoping to create a sense of ownership of the artwork in the Ohio River town.  

In addition, Kannenberg said, the class has sent letters to all the chief justices in the other 49 states soliciting contributions in honor of their brother on the bench.

“We’re starting to sense what’s going to be the end of the tunnel rather than questions and unknowns,” Kannenberg said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Indiana's seatbelt law is not punishable as a crime. It is an infraction. Apparently some of our Circuit judges have deemed settled law inapplicable if it fails to fit their litmus test of political correctness. Extrapolating to redefine terms of behavior in a violation of immigration law to the entire body of criminal law leaves a smorgasbord of opportunity for judicial mischief.

  2. I wonder if $10 diversions for failure to wear seat belts are considered moral turpitude in federal immigration law like they are under Indiana law? Anyone know?

  3. What a fine article, thank you! I can testify firsthand and by detailed legal reports (at end of this note) as to the dire consequences of rejecting this truth from the fine article above: "The inclusion and expansion of this right [to jury] in Indiana’s Constitution is a clear reflection of our state’s intention to emphasize the importance of every Hoosier’s right to make their case in front of a jury of their peers." Over $20? Every Hoosier? Well then how about when your very vocation is on the line? How about instead of a jury of peers, one faces a bevy of political appointees, mini-czars, who care less about due process of the law than the real czars did? Instead of trial by jury, trial by ideological ordeal run by Orwellian agents? Well that is built into more than a few administrative law committees of the Ind S.Ct., and it is now being weaponized, as is revealed in articles posted at this ezine, to root out post moderns heresies like refusal to stand and pledge allegiance to all things politically correct. My career was burned at the stake for not so saluting, but I think I was just one of the early logs. Due, at least in part, to the removal of the jury from bar admission and bar discipline cases, many more fires will soon be lit. Perhaps one awaits you, dear heretic? Oh, at that Ind. article 12 plank about a remedy at law for every damage done ... ah, well, the founders evidently meant only for those damages done not by the government itself, rabid statists that they were. (Yes, that was sarcasm.) My written reports available here: Denied petition for cert (this time around): http://tinyurl.com/zdmawmw Denied petition for cert (from the 2009 denial and five year banishment): http://tinyurl.com/zcypybh Related, not written by me: Amicus brief: http://tinyurl.com/hvh7qgp

  4. Justice has finally been served. So glad that Dr. Ley can finally sleep peacefully at night knowing the truth has finally come to the surface.

  5. While this right is guaranteed by our Constitution, it has in recent years been hampered by insurance companies, i.e.; the practice of the plaintiff's own insurance company intervening in an action and filing a lien against any proceeds paid to their insured. In essence, causing an additional financial hurdle for a plaintiff to overcome at trial in terms of overall award. In a very real sense an injured party in exercise of their right to trial by jury may be the only party in a cause that would end up with zero compensation.

ADVERTISEMENT