ILNews

Proposed settlement may net $25 million for environmental cleanup

Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The proposed settlement filed today in the bankruptcy case involving former General Motors sites could provide nearly $25 million for cleanup of eight Indiana sites with ties to the automaker.

Indiana and 13 other states, along with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, filed the proposed settlement of the bankruptcy case with Motors Liquidation Corporation, which used to be called General Motors. When the company filed for Chapter 11 reorganization last year, a new entity – General Motors LLC – was created and purchased many of GM’s auto-making facilities and the name “General Motors.” The old GM was renamed in the process and agreed to use bankruptcy proceedings to remediate or liquidate 89 remaining MLC-owned manufacturing sites that weren’t purchased by the new GM.

The settlement totals nearly $773 million and includes provisions so that the states can oversee and monitor environmental cleanup of the sites by the court-appointed trustee and redevelopment managers, and implement any changes if needed. Cleanup will allow for redevelopment of the old sites for future manufacturers or businesses.

The Indiana sites are in Anderson, Indianapolis, Kokomo, and Muncie.

Now there will be a 3-day public comment period after which the court can accept the agreement. The suit is in U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.   
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Such things are no more elections than those in the late, unlamented Soviet Union.

  2. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  3. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  4. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  5. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

ADVERTISEMENT