The Indiana Supreme Court's Disciplinary Commission has filed a complaint against Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi
alleging he played to the media and violated professional conduct rules when commenting about two murder cases.
Filing a six-page complaint Oct. 1, the Disciplinary Commission is charging the 15-year prosecutor with making statements
that went beyond the public informational purpose and prejudiced the pair of cases. He is charged with violating Indiana Professional
Conduct Rules 3.8(f) and Rule 3.6.
The complaint says Brizzi's statements "... were not necessary to inform the public of the nature and extent of
the prosecutor's action and did not serve a legitimate law enforcement purpose, and the same were extrajudicial comments
that had a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation ...."
Some of the comments were made at an April 2008 news conference during which Brizzi speculated about accused multi-state
serial killer Bruce Mendenhall's mindset at the time of the Indianapolis killing of Carma Purpura, and also detailed evidence
against the man. Comments included details of the victim's death and Brizzi said: "It's almost as if he (Mendenhall)
wanted to get caught and then play a game of I'm smarter than the police."
The commission's second allegation involves a 2006 news release about seven family members who were brutally killed at
a Hamilton Avenue house in Indianapolis, a case in which Brizzi initially sought the death penalty. A comment in that news
release stated about the defendants, "They weren't going to let anyone or anything get in the way of what they believed
to be an easy score."
Defendant Desmond Turner is set to begin a bench trial early next week; the prosecutor now is seeking a penalty of life without
parole. The Marion County Prosecutor's Office couldn't be reached today for comment about what, if any, impact this
disciplinary action could have on that trial next week.
Neither Brizzi nor his spokesman returned messages from the newspaper seeking comment on the commission's action.
Brizzi has until the end of October to file a response to the charges, though that is not required. The Indiana Supreme Court
has final say over attorney disciplinary issues, and if it finds misconduct the penalties could range from a private reprimand
to suspension or disbarment.














Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...
Yikes!