ILNews

Prosecutors: money doesn't trump other factors when considering death penalty

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Cost of Justice

At first, Pike County Prosecuting Attorney Darrin McDonald says it was clear the death penalty was warranted against a man accused of murdering three people and wounding another before leaving them all in a cornfield in 2006.

Even though that capital punishment case would have potentially crippled the small rural county’s budget and how the prosecutor’s office conducted the rest of its duties, he describes that as the right move to ensure justice for the community and families of those victims.

But once the full scope of the length and cost of a capital case unraveled, the mood changed and within a year of the death penalty being filed, McDonald said the county opted against seeking capital punishment in favor of a life without parole guilty plea for defendant Nicholas Harbison, who’d led police on a nationwide manhunt before he was arrested and ultimately tried and convicted.

A complete reversal in what the victims’ families wanted surprised him most, but he doesn’t regret the decisions made and says it ended up preventing the county from paying out hundreds of thousands of dollars for a death penalty trial instead of $84,000, the estimated maximum trial cost for both the prosecution and the defense in this case.

“At some point, it was apparent to the families that they wouldn’t get any closure from the death penalty system and it wasn’t worth it,” McDonald says now. “But if it had just been about the cost, we would have had a death penalty case, no matter what it meant for the county budget. Ultimately in this case, it was about the wishes of the victims’ families and making sure this person can’t do this again – and that meant life.”

At a time when capital punishment requests are down and some state officials are questioning the cost and overall effectiveness of seeking a death sentence, the issue of what it’s worth to go after this ultimate punishment is getting more scrutiny in Indiana and nationwide.

Prosecutors throughout Indiana say that the financial costs of capital punishment are part of the process in deciding whether to pursue that penalty, though it’s not the determining factor. The need to obtain an adequate measure of justice for the victims and community is what solidifies the choice.

Some give the financial cost more weight than others, and pressure can mount based on what evidence exists and the public drive to achieve justice. But it’s a decision that none say is made lightly.

Johnson Superior Judge Lance Hamner, who served as the county’s prosecutor for 16 years before taking the bench in 2009, reflected on his handling of two death penalty-eligible cases during his tenure and how he made the decisions to pursue that punishment. In one of those cases, Hamner ended up with a life without parole sentence after evidence was suppressed because of a flawed capital search warrant. But he secured a capital sentence on the other case against Michael Dean Overstreet, convicted for the murder of a Franklin College student in 1997. He was sentenced to death in 2000, and that conviction has been upheld on appeals at the state level. Overstreet’s appeal is now winding its way through the federal habeas corpus process in the Northern District of Indiana.

“There’s no mathematical formula to making that kind of decision,” Judge Hamner says now about choosing the capital punishment path. “No one factor is dispositive by itself, you just kind of have to weigh everything together. You just kind of know when you have to. But this really requires substantial deliberation to decide if everyone involved can endure what needs to be done to see it imposed.”

When considering Overstreet’s fate, the former prosecutor says that cost wasn’t a deciding factor, but it was something he talked a lot about when weighing the issues. Costs were not calculated from the prosecutor’s side, but Indiana Public Defender’s Commission reimbursement figures, which represent half of total reimbursable defense costs, show $217,557 was spent by Johnson County for defense capital costs from 1998 to 2002 when Overstreet was being tried. The total defense cost was $435,114 for the trial phase.

“Under the circumstances, justice required we go forward with the death penalty,” Judge Hamner said. “We didn’t calculate the costs from our end, but I know it wasn’t cheap. We had to bring in a jury and sequester them for the month-long trial, and additionally there was just a lot of wear and tear on the prosecutor’s office.”

Much of the prosecution’s work is built into the county budgets and existing duties, but prosecutors must essentially take on a capital case like a full-time job and make sure the rest of the office can continue handling the non-capital and daily tasks without trouble. That can be a problem for smaller counties, and some ask for budget increases or even small special tax assessments to pay for that. National reports show that death penalty cases have bankrupted some small communities.


Terry Curry Curry

In Marion County, newly elected Prosecutor Terry Curry has faced some criticism for his decision to pursue a death sentence against Thomas Hardy, the man accused of fatally shooting Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department officer David Moore in January. Curry has said he knows that penalty will be costly and that the 60-year old defendant will likely die naturally before he would get through the legal system to be executed, but he believes it is justified in this case.

“Anything less than the ultimate possible punishment minimizes the sacrifice of Officer Moore, and indeed, all public safety officers who have lost their lives in the line of duty,” Curry said, noting that his office has considered the merits of the case and evidence along with the financial cost and Hardy’s age.

Curry said the prosecutor’s office, even before this incident, had formulated a committee review procedure to evaluate the circumstances of any homicide which would involve capital punishment.

The most recent decision is in contrast to what his predecessor, Carl Brizzi, had decided involving the Hamilton Avenue murders that occurred in Indianapolis in 2006. In that case, seven people were murdered and the prosecutor ultimately decided not to pursue the death penalty because of evidentiary concerns.

That just points out how each case is different and must be carefully weighed, according to Hamner. Factors range from whether the case is a statutory fit for the death penalty, how strong the evidence may be, what the victim family feelings are, and what kind of burden that type of case might put on a prosecutor’s office and county budget.

“You’re talking about taking away a person’s life, and that isn’t a decision that can be entered into lightly,” Hamner said.

The return on investment is dismal – some studies say less than 5 percent of all original death penalty requests end with that punishment, and Indiana’s own figures from 2000 to 2007 show that only six of 26 murder cases where the death penalty was sought ended up with that sentence at the trial stage. Most don’t make it through the appellate process unaltered.

For Hamilton Superior Judge Steven Nation, who as a prosecutor initially sought the death penalty in a Carmel triple-murder case, the circumstances of the crime itself weighed on his mind the most.


Nation Nation

That involved the March 1994 murders of teenagers Nick and Lisa Allemenos and 23-year-old Chris James inside a ransacked Carmel home, with each bound and gagged with duct tape and their throats slit. Three suspects were arrested, including Kofi Ajabu, and the prosecutor at the time announced he’d seek the death penalty with support from the teenagers’ mother. Apparently, a robbery for rent money had turned into a triple homicide.

“The thing that’s always startled me more than anything about the Carmel murders was the viciousness of the death,” Judge Nation says now. “Those three victims were killed over such a long period of time, not quick like you normally see. That stood out in my mind and was one of the main points that convinced me we needed the death penalty.”

Judge Nation took the bench in early 1995, and his chief deputy Sonia Leerkamp became prosecutor. The day of the sentencing hearing, the prosecutor’s office withdrew the death penalty, and Ajabu received a life without parole sentence that’s been upheld on appeal.

Looking back, Nation says he doesn’t see that cost was involved in the decision making at the local level. However, he pointed out his frustration that crimes like this in a small county might truly warrant a death sentence, but people can’t obtain that justice because of the financial burden. Something should be done about that, he said.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Hello everyone am precious from the united state of America am here to testify in the name of this great man who has brought back happiness into my family after my lover Chris left me for 3years for another woman,i really loved Chris because he was my first love i tried everything within my power to get Chris back to my life but people i met just kept on scamming me and lying to me,Then normally on Saturdays i do go out to make my hair and get some stuff,Then i had people discussing at the saloon if they do listen to there radio well,That there is a program (how i got back my ex)And started talking much about Dr EDDY how this man has helped lots of people in bringing back there lover,So immediately i went close to those ladies i met at the saloon and i explained things to them they said i should try and contact Dr EDDY that he has been the talk of the town and people are really contacting him for help immediately we searched on the internet and read great things about Dr EDDY i now got all Dr EDDY contact instantly at the saloon i gave Dr EDDY a call and i shared my problem with him he just told me not to worry that i should just be happy,He just told me to send him some few details which i did,And then he got back to me that everything would be okay within 36hours i was so happy then Dr EDDY did his work and he did not fail me,My lover Chris came to me in tears and apologized to me for leaving me in deep pain for good 3years,So he decided to prove that he will never leave me for any reason he made me had access to his account and made me his next of kin on all his will,Now the most perfect thing is that he can't spend a minute without seeing me or calling me,Am so grateful to Dr EDDY for bringing back the happiness which i lack for years,Please contact Dr EDDY for help he is a trustworthy man in email is dreddyspiritualtemple@gmail.com or you can call him or whatsapp him with this number...+23408160830324 (1)If you want your ex back. (2) if you always have bad dreams. (3)You want to be promoted in your office. (4)You want women/men to run after you. (5)If you want a child. (6)[You want to be rich. (7)You want to tie your husband/wife to be yours forever. (8)If you need financial assistance. (9)If you want to stop your Divorce. 10)Help bringing people out of prison. (11)Marriage Spells (12)Miracle Spells (13)Beauty Spells (14)PROPHECY CHARM (15)Attraction Spells (16)Evil Eye Spells. (17)Kissing Spell (18)Remove Sickness Spells. (19)ELECTION WINNING SPELLS. (20)SUCCESS IN EXAMS SPELLS. (21) Charm to get who to love you. CONTACT:dreddyspiritualtemple@gmail.com

  2. The appellate court just said doctors can be sued for reporting child abuse. The most dangerous form of child abuse with the highest mortality rate of any form of child abuse (between 6% and 9% according to the below listed studies). Now doctors will be far less likely to report this form of dangerous child abuse in Indiana. If you want to know what this is, google the names Lacey Spears, Julie Conley (and look at what happened when uninformed judges returned that child against medical advice), Hope Ybarra, and Dixie Blanchard. Here is some really good reporting on what this allegation was: http://media.star-telegram.com/Munchausenmoms/ Here are the two research papers: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0145213487900810 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213403000309 25% of sibling are dead in that second study. 25%!!! Unbelievable ruling. Chilling. Wrong.

  3. MELISA EVA VALUE INVESTMENT Greetings to you from Melisa Eva Value Investment. We offer Business and Personal loans, it is quick and easy and hence can be availed without any hassle. We do not ask for any collateral or guarantors while approving these loans and hence these loans require minimum documentation. We offer great and competitive interest rates of 2% which do not weigh you down too much. These loans have a comfortable pay-back period. Apply today by contacting us on E-mail: melisaeva9@gmail.com WE DO NOT ASK FOR AN UPFRONT FEE. BEWARE OF SCAMMERS AND ONLINE FRAUD.

  4. Mr. Levin says that the BMV engaged in misconduct--that the BMV (or, rather, someone in the BMV) knew Indiana motorists were being overcharged fees but did nothing to correct the situation. Such misconduct, whether engaged in by one individual or by a group, is called theft (defined as knowingly or intentionally exerting unauthorized control over the property of another person with the intent to deprive the other person of the property's value or use). Theft is a crime in Indiana (as it still is in most of the civilized world). One wonders, then, why there have been no criminal prosecutions of BMV officials for this theft? Government misconduct doesn't occur in a vacuum. An individual who works for or oversees a government agency is responsible for the misconduct. In this instance, somebody (or somebodies) with the BMV, at some time, knew Indiana motorists were being overcharged. What's more, this person (or these people), even after having the error of their ways pointed out to them, did nothing to fix the problem. Instead, the overcharges continued. Thus, the taxpayers of Indiana are also on the hook for the millions of dollars in attorneys fees (for both sides; the BMV didn't see fit to avail itself of the services of a lawyer employed by the state government) that had to be spent in order to finally convince the BMV that stealing money from Indiana motorists was a bad thing. Given that the BMV official(s) responsible for this crime continued their misconduct, covered it up, and never did anything until the agency reached an agreeable settlement, it seems the statute of limitations for prosecuting these folks has not yet run. I hope our Attorney General is paying attention to this fiasco and is seriously considering prosecution. Indiana, the state that works . . . for thieves.

  5. I'm glad that attorney Carl Hayes, who represented the BMV in this case, is able to say that his client "is pleased to have resolved the issue". Everyone makes mistakes, even bureaucratic behemoths like Indiana's BMV. So to some extent we need to be forgiving of such mistakes. But when those mistakes are going to cost Indiana taxpayers millions of dollars to rectify (because neither plaintiff's counsel nor Mr. Hayes gave freely of their services, and the BMV, being a state-funded agency, relies on taxpayer dollars to pay these attorneys their fees), the agency doesn't have a right to feel "pleased to have resolved the issue". One is left wondering why the BMV feels so pleased with this resolution? The magnitude of the agency's overcharges might suggest to some that, perhaps, these errors were more than mere oversight. Could this be why the agency is so "pleased" with this resolution? Will Indiana motorists ever be assured that the culture of incompetence (if not worse) that the BMV seems to have fostered is no longer the status quo? Or will even more "overcharges" and lawsuits result? It's fairly obvious who is really "pleased to have resolved the issue", and it's not Indiana's taxpayers who are on the hook for the legal fees generated in these cases.

ADVERTISEMENT