ILNews

Pyrz begins his last year leading Indiana State Bar Association

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
pyrz-1-15col.jpg Thomas Pyrz, executive director since November 1992, has guided the Indiana State Bar Association to be more responsive to attorneys’ changing needs and demands. (IL Photo/Eric Learned)

Baseball players are prone to superstitions so it’s not surprising that Thomas Pyrz, Indiana State Bar Association executive director and former shortstop, is starting one of his own.

Pyrz, who has led the ISBA since Nov. 22, 1992, plans to retire at the end of 2017. His nearly 25-year tenure has included hiring additional staff, launching new programs, and increasing the value of membership to counter attorneys’ shifting view of the association.

The white board hanging on his office wall shows that for his final year in office he will not be riding the bench. Marked on the coming months are meetings, conferences and tasks he has to complete as he continues to marshal the organization and prepare it for the next executive director.

However, the white board also shows he will be taking time to tend to his new superstition. There in March, several days are crossed out for a trip with his family to see the Chicago Cubs at spring training.

Pyrz factboxBorn and raised on the south side of Chicago, Pyrz is genetically predisposed to baseball. (He is the nephew of one-time Cincinnati Reds first baseman Ted Kluszewski.) He is a lifelong Cubs fan who remembers the heartbreak and disappointment that came with many baseball seasons.

He never wavered in his loyalty, and during the opening months of 2016, he took the time to attend his first Cubs spring training. Pyrz proudly noted that following his trip, the team went on to break its 108-year curse and win a World Series. Maybe, he said, if he does the same pre-season visit, the Cubs will repeat.

As another baseball superstition takes root, Pyrz sounded like a team manager as he discussed the year ahead and the demands of being a state bar executive director. He emphasized the attorney volunteers run the organization while he just provides stability by administering the programs and projects they want to enact. Leaders who take a my-way-or-the-highway approach make a big mistake.

John Meyers, executive director of the Kentucky Bar Association, echoed Pyrz, saying association leaders have to be able to adapt very readily. Each year, a new president is appointed, forcing the executive directors to meet the challenge of working with different people who have different leadership styles.

Meyers said his Hoosier counterpart has been successful because he does not get tangled in the details and does not lose sight of how things fit together.

“Tom always has a very good handle on the big picture,” Meyers said. “He can discuss various aspects of whatever project you’re talking about.”

The changing lineup is what keeps Pyrz engaged. Even after more than two decades as executive director, he still enjoys his job, especially because of the attorney volunteers and the new leaders who arrive bringing fresh ideas.

“The best part of my job is the dynamic volunteers I get to work with,” he said. “They are the absolute cream of the crop.”

From baseball to barrister

Pyrz credited his education at West Point, formally known at the United States Military Academy, with teaching him the managerial skills he uses at the bar association.

“If you do your job to the best of your ability and you have absolute integrity about you,” Pyrz explained, “you can do pretty much any job.”

Still, he paused before taking a swing at the question of whether he liked attending West Point, then explained he appreciated what the school taught him and the friendships he was able to form. He followed his older brother to the Army academy and spent each spring playing baseball, eventually becoming team captain.

More significantly, he rose to the rank of first captain and brigade commander of his senior class. In that position, he described himself as the “potted plant,” accompanying then-Superintendent William Knowlton on speaking engagements around the country and to dinner with heads of state.

After graduation in 1971, he joined an Army Ranger airborne company, “jumping out of perfectly good airplanes.” He was stationed in Germany when he was introduced to the legal profession by way of a jury summons.

“I was really enchanted by the way the lawyers worked the courtroom on both sides,” Pyrz said. “In some cases, I was disappointed by what I saw, and in some cases I was very excited by what I saw, and I said, ‘I think this is something I can do when I get out of the service.’”

Not waiting until he retired from the military, he enrolled as a young solider at Indiana University Maurer School of Law and then practiced in the U.S. Army JAG Corps. His last tour of duty was at Fort Benjamin Harrison where he struck up a friendship with Jack Lyle, the late ISBA executive director.

With Lyle’s encouragement, Pyrz took a “leap of faith” and applied for the position at the ISBA. He relied heavily on the small staff of 10 when he took over and stayed up late many nights reading about the history of the association.

Robert Craghead, executive director of the Illinois State Bar Association, watched Pyrz work and believes the West Pointer has improved the Indiana organization. Pyrz has met the demands by understanding the needs of ISBA members while embracing change that is coming at an ever faster pace.

“Tom Pyrz will be hard to replace no matter what,” Craghead said. “I would be less than honest if I didn’t say that Tom’s retirement is very bittersweet. He’s a very capable bar leader but also someone I consider to be my friend.”

The coming change-up

During Pyrz’s tenure, the nature of the Indiana State Bar Association, like bar associations across the country, changed.

Initially, bar associations were social organizations where attorneys gathered for conversation and friendship. They believed joining the organization was part of their professional obligation. Today, lawyers want to know what they will get in return for their dues, which has caused many associations to now focus on providing members the tools and resources they need to practice in a very competitive market.

Membership numbers are slipping although Pyrz estimated about 70 percent of attorneys licensed in Indiana belong to the ISBA.

Meyers and Craghead have seen this same trend in their own bar associations. In Indiana, like Illinois, membership is voluntary while Kentucky requires attorneys to join as a part of their license to practice in the Commonwealth.

Pyrz wondered if the next executive director might have to reconsider the voluntary format. In particular, he pointed to the Clients’ Financial Assistance Fund, which provides compensation to victims of attorney defalcation. Members of the association are paying money into the fund, he said, but nonmembers often are causing the payouts.

However, Craghead maintained that voluntary bars are better situated for survival. To stay relevant, these kinds of associations have learned to be nimble and respond quickly to changes and members’ needs.

Under Pyrz, the ISBA has done that. It has offered members free services like the online research portal Casemaker and launched programs, like the Indiana Kids’ Election and the Leadership Academy, which enable attorneys to become more involved with their communities.

He sees those programs as essential not only to the attorneys but also to the larger communities. He believes society would be hurt if the bar association dissolved.

“No question in my mind, we serve a valuable purpose in the day-to-day lives of the citizens and the lawyers of this state,” Pyrz said.

Once he leaves the ISBA, Pyrz does not plan to spend his days on a beach. He declined to provide details about his future plans but he did note he is definitely interested if the Cubs call.

“If they want a scout, I’d be OK with that,” he said.•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Kudos to Tom Pyrz!
    I whole-heartedly agree with Doug Church's comment, above. Indiana lawyers were especially fortunate to benefit from Tom Pyrz' leadership and foresight at a time when there has been unprecedented change in the legal profession. Consider how dramatically computer technology and its role in the practice of law have changed over the last 25 years. The impact of the great recession of 2008 dramatically changed the composition and structure of law firms across the country. Economic pressures altered what had long been a routine, robust annual recruitment process for law students and recent law school graduates. That has, in turn, impacted law school enrollment across the country, placing upward pressure on law school tuition. The internet continues to drive significant changes in the provision of legal services in both public and private sectors. The ISBA has worked to make quality legal representation accessible and affordable for all who need it and to raise general public understanding of Indiana laws and procedures. How difficult it would have been to tackle each of these issues without Tom's leadership. Tom has set the tone for positive change at the ISBA to meet the evolving practice needs of lawyers of all backgrounds and ages. He has led the organization with vision, patience, flexibility, commitment, thoughtfulness & even humor. He will, indeed, be a tough act to follow. Thank you, Tom, for all you've done and all the energy you've invested in making the ISBA an excellent, progressive, highly responsive, all-inclusive, respectful & respected professional association during his tenure there.
  • The Best of the Best!
    The significance of the contributions of Tom Pyrz to the success of the Indiana State Bar Association, and, more importantly, the success of its members, cannot be overstated. It has been a privilege to have had the chance to work with him and he will be missed!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. OK, take notice. Those wondering just how corrupt the Indiana system is can see the picture in this post. Attorney Donald James did not criticize any judges, he merely, it would seem, caused some clients to file against him and then ignored his own defense. James thus disrespected the system via ignoring all and was also ordered to reimburse the commission $525.88 for the costs of prosecuting the first case against him. Yes, nearly $526 for all the costs, the state having proved it all. Ouch, right? Now consider whistleblower and constitutionalist and citizen journalist Paul Ogden who criticized a judge, defended himself in such a professional fashion as to have half the case against him thrown out by the ISC and was then handed a career ending $10,000 bill as "half the costs" of the state crucifying him. http://www.theindianalawyer.com/ogden-quitting-law-citing-high-disciplinary-fine/PARAMS/article/35323 THE TAKEAWAY MESSAGE for any who have ears to hear ... resist Star Chamber and pay with your career ... welcome to the Indiana system of (cough) justice.

  2. GMA Ranger, I, too, was warned against posting on how the Ind govt was attempting to destroy me professionally, and visit great costs and even destitution upon my family through their processing. No doubt the discussion in Indy today is likely how to ban me from this site (I expect I soon will be), just as they have banned me from emailing them at the BLE and Office of Bar Admission and ADA coordinator -- or, if that fails, whether they can file a complaint against my Kansas or SCOTUS law license for telling just how they operate and offering all of my files over the past decade to any of good will. The elitist insiders running the Hoosier social control mechanisms realize that knowledge and a unified response will be the end of their unjust reign. They fear exposure and accountability. I was banned for life from the Indiana bar for questioning government processing, that is, for being a whistleblower. Hoosier whistleblowers suffer much. I have no doubt, Gma Ranger, of what you report. They fear us, but realize as long as they keep us in fear of them, they can control us. Kinda like the kids' show Ants. Tyrannical governments the world over are being shaken by empowered citizens. Hoosiers dealing with The Capitol are often dealing with tyranny. Time to rise up: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/jan/17/governments-struggling-to-retain-trust-of-citizens-global-survey-finds Back to the Founders! MAGA!

  3. Science is showing us the root of addiction is the lack of connection (with people). Criminalizing people who are lonely is a gross misinterpretation of what data is revealing and the approach we must take to combat mental health. Harsher crimes from drug dealers? where there is a demand there is a market, so make it legal and encourage these citizens to be functioning members of a society with competitive market opportunities. Legalize are "drugs" and quit wasting tax payer dollars on frivolous incarceration. The system is destroying lives and doing it in the name of privatized profits. To demonize loneliness and destroy lives in the land of opportunity is not freedom.

  4. Good luck, but as I have documented in three Hail Mary's to the SCOTUS, two applications (2007 & 2013),a civil rights suit and my own kicked-to-the-curb prayer for mandamus. all supported in detailed affidavits with full legal briefing (never considered), the ISC knows that the BLE operates "above the law" (i.e. unconstitutionally) and does not give a damn. In fact, that is how it was designed to control the lawyers. IU Law Prof. Patrick Baude blew the whistle while he was Ind Bar Examiner President back in 1993, even he was shut down. It is a masonic system that blackballs those whom the elite disdain. Here is the basic thrust:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackballing When I asked why I was initially denied, the court's foremost jester wrote back that the ten examiners all voted, and I did not gain the needed votes for approval (whatever that is, probably ten) and thus I was not in .. nothing written, no explanation, just go away or appeal ... and if you appeal and disagree with their system .. proof positive you lack character and fitness. It is both arbitrary and capricious by its very design. The Hoosier legal elites are monarchical minded, and rejected me for life for ostensibly failing to sufficiently respect man's law (due to my stated regard for God's law -- which they questioned me on, after remanding me for a psych eval for holding such Higher Law beliefs) while breaking their own rules, breaking federal statutory law, and violating federal and state constitutions and ancient due process standards .. all well documented as they "processed me" over many years.... yes years ... they have few standards that they will not bulldoze to get to the end desired. And the ISC knows this, and they keep it in play. So sad, And the fed courts refuse to do anything, and so the blackballing show goes on ... it is the Indy way. My final experience here: https://www.scribd.com/document/299040062/Brown-ind-Bar-memo-Pet-cert I will open my files to anyone interested in seeing justice dawn over Indy. My cases are an open book, just ask.

  5. Looks like 2017 will be another notable year for these cases. I have a Grandson involved in a CHINS case that should never have been. He and the whole family are being held hostage by CPS and the 'current mood' of the CPS caseworker. If the parents disagree with a decision, they are penalized. I, along with other were posting on Jasper County Online News, but all were quickly warned to remove posts. I totally understand that some children need these services, but in this case, it was mistakes, covered by coorcement of father to sign papers, lies and cover-ups. The most astonishing thing was within 2 weeks of this child being placed with CPS, a private adoption agency was asking questions regarding child's family in the area. I believe a photo that was taken by CPS manager at the very onset during the CHINS co-ocerment and the intent was to make money. I have even been warned not to post or speak to anyone regarding this case. Parents have completed all requirements, met foster parents, get visitation 2 days a week, and still the next court date is all the way out till May 1, which gives them(CPS) plenty of to time make further demands (which I expect) No trust of these 'seasoned' case managers, as I have already learned too much about their dirty little tricks. If they discover that I have posted here, I expect they will not be happy and penalized parents again. Still a Hostage.

ADVERTISEMENT