A southern Indiana company could be on the hook for $26 million in contaminated site cleanup costs, a consequence of a federal
judge's default ruling in June that found the business and its former attorneys had purposely withheld evidence and misled
the court.
In a remediation plan filed in U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Tuesday in 1100 West v. Red Spot Paint
& Varnish Co., No. 1:05-CV-1670, the plaintiff detailed costs ranging from $24.7 million to $25.8 million for the
investigation and cleanup of the Evansville area site. Judge Larry McKinney will determine the amount, which comes as part
of a partial settlement agreement recorded on the court docket last month.
The case involves a business's 7-acre site that it claims was heavily contaminated with toxic chemicals from the nearby
Red Spot property. After filing a state court suit in 2003 about the alleged contamination, 1100 West took the case to federal
court in 2005 and sought injunctive relief under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. 1100 West asked the judge to
order the removal of all the chemicals near its property and for Red Spot to stop discharging any of that hazardous and solid
waste from its nearby property.
A central issue in the case was whether particular chemicals were used at the site, and both sides debated during discovery
whether those chemicals were ever stored at the site. Red Spot officials testified throughout the litigation that the company
hadn't used or stored specific chemicals, but opposing counsel showed otherwise and Judge McKinney found that discovery
had been withheld. As a result, the judge sanctioned Indianapolis firm Bose McKinney & Evans for the conduct of some of
the attorneys who he determined had abused the discovery process and allowed their client to evade the truth. Two of those
attorneys are no longer with the firm, and the company has since hired new counsel.
In the June ruling, Judge McKinney issued a default judgment against Red Spot that held it responsible for the cleanup costs.
Now, Red Spot has 60 days to object to the proposed remediation plan; a hearing is set for Nov. 4.














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.