ILNews

Report: Segregation can lead to increased symptoms of mental illness in inmates

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A new report from an inmates-rights advocacy group is calling for fewer prison inmates to be placed in segregation based on research that shows that segregation can lead to a higher risk for mental illness.

In “Locked Up and Locked Down: Segregation of Inmates with Mental Illness” — which was compiled by the Amplifying Voices of Inmates with Disabilities Prison Project, the National Disability Rights Network and protection and advocacy agencies in 20 states — Anna Guy, AVID attorney, writes that roughly 80,000 to 100,000 inmates are placed in single-person cells for 22 to 24 hours a day for days, months or even years. Most segregation cells are six-by-eight feet and contain a bed, sink and toilet.

While most prisons have claimed that segregating some inmates is necessary to reduce institutional violence, Guy writes that there is no research to suggest that segregation increases safety. Instead, Guy said many of the inmates who are in segregation are there because of behaviors related to mental illness, or later develop symptoms of mental illness because of their isolation.

“Segregation is harmful for all inmates, but it’s particularly harmful for inmates with mental illness who have unique therapeutic needs that are generally unavailable in prisons,” Guy said in a statement.  “In drafting this report, we found that inmates with mental illness from all over the country are routinely placed in the most restrictive form of segregated housing where they receive even less mental health care and are treated even more harshly than other inmates in segregation for serious rules violation, resulting in increased punishment based solely on their disability.”

Guy’s report references a recent case in Indiana, Indiana Protection and Advocacy Services Commission v. Commissioner, Indiana Department of Correction, in which a court found that the Indiana Department of Correction’s policies for segregation of inmates with mental illnesses violated the Eighth Amendment prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment. The Department of Correction and the plaintiffs in the case – the Indiana Protection and Advocacy Services Commission (now Indiana Disability Rights) and the ACLU of Indiana – came to an agreement that makes improvements to the conditions for inmates with mental illnesses, including the prohibition of segregation of inmates with serious mental illnesses, with some exceptions.

“This case underscores the importance of access to care for people with mental illness and highlights the need for reform in our mental health system,” Indiana Disability Rights Executive Director Dawn Adams said in a statement.

The report, which can be read here, features examples of both litigation and non-litigation advocacy cases that show sensory deprivation, psychiatric decompensation and self-harm or suicidal behaviors exhibited by inmates with mental illness and segregation. Further, the report says that prison employees who work in these units are often untrained to deal with the symptoms of mental illness, which has resulted in chemical agents such as pepper spray or physical restraints being used to control the behaviors of segregated inmates who suffer from mental illness.
Additionally, inmates in segregation are often required to be escorted throughout the prison in restraints and accompanied by at least two officers, which reduces socialization opportunities, the report says.

“This and other security restrictions often result in limited access to programs such as skill building, education, vocational training, group therapy, socialization or other activities,” Guy writes in the report. “These activities are important tools for helping inmates learn skills for daily living and medication compliance, including how to take care of their most basic personal hygiene and everyday needs.”

To address the research and concerns included in the report on a national level, Guy offered five recommendations:

  • Increased federal funding to the protection and advocacy networks for corrections-based monitoring and advocacy;
  • Creation of independent corrections ombuds offices at the state level in order to address inmate concerns before they rise to the level of litigation;
  • Increased data collection by the U.S. Department of Justice’s Bureau of Justice Statistics regarding the prevalence of people with mental illness in U.S. prisons and jails;
  • Increased monitoring and outreach in prisons by protection and advocacy networks across the country; and
  • Fostering of collaborative relationships between state prison systems and protection and advocacy networks.
     
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Or does the study merely wish they fade away? “It just hasn’t risen substantially in decades,” Joan Williams, director of the Center for WorkLife Law at the University of California Hastings College of the Law told Law360. “What we should be looking for is progress, and that’s not what we’re seeing.” PROGRESS = less white males in leadership. Thus the heading and honest questions here ....

  2. One need not wonder why we are importing sex slaves into North America. Perhaps these hapless victims of human trafficking were being imported for a book of play with the Royal Order of Jesters? https://medium.com/@HeapingHelping/who-are-the-royal-order-of-jesters-55ffe6f6acea Indianapolis hosts these major pervs in a big way .... https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Royal-Order-of-Jesters-National-Office/163360597025389 I wonder what affect they exert on Hoosier politics? And its judiciary? A very interesting program on their history and preferences here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtgBdUtw26c

  3. Joseph Buser, Montgomery County Chief Prosecutor, has been involved in both representing the State of Indiana as Prosecutor while filing as Representing Attorney on behalf of himself and the State of Indiana in Civil Proceedings for seized cash and merchandise using a Verified Complaint For Forfeiture of Motor Vehicle, Us Currency And Reimbursement Of Costs, as is evident in Montgomery County Circuit Court Case Number 54C01-1401-MI-000018, CCS below, seen before Judge Harry Siamas, and filed on 01/13/2014. Sheriff Mark Castille is also named. All three defendants named by summons have prior convictions under Mr. Buser, which as the Indiana Supreme Court, in the opinion of The Matter of Mark R. McKinney, No. 18S00-0905-DI-220, stated that McKinney created a conflict of interest by simultaneously prosecuting drug offender cases while pocketing assets seized from defendants in those cases. All moneys that come from forfeitures MUST go to the COMMON SCHOOL FUND.

  4. I was incarcerated at that time for driving while suspended I have no felonies...i was placed on P block I remember several girls and myself asking about voting that day..and wasn't given a answer or means of voting..we were told after the election who won that was it.

  5. The number one way to reduce suffering would be to ban the breeding of fighting dogs. Fighting dogs maim and kill victim dogs Fighting dogs are the most essential piece of dog fighting Dog fighting will continue as long as fighting dogs are struggling to reach each other and maul another fih.longaphernalia

ADVERTISEMENT