ILNews

Rise of the zombie house

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

When a bank files a motion to set aside a foreclosure judgment, often the courts consider the filing good news, assuming the lender and the homeowner have reached a settlement.

But things aren’t always what they seem, and courts can be at risk of being duped.

While a lending institution may give the impression to the judge that a settlement agreement has been reached, homeowners are often unaware that the scheduled sheriff’s sale did not happen or that a motion to vacate has been filed. The result can be abandoned properties falling into disrepair; cities unsure of who actually owns the eyesores; and homeowners, unknowingly, accruing past-due bills for taxes, interest and mortgages that they unlikely will be able to pay.

boyer-nancy.jpg Boyer

Notre Dame Law School Clinical Professor Judith Fox examined this phenomenon, what she called the “foreclosure echo,” in a 2013 article published in the Loyola Consumer Law Review. She looked at the impact that a bank’s often inexplicable decision to “un-foreclose” has on the judicial system as well as homeowners and communities.

“One thing I hope happens from my paper is that judges would just ask questions and just pay more attention,” Fox said.

The physical remains of these foreclosure reversals have been given nicknames that identify their scary implications – zombie home and zombie title.

Zombie homes arise when homeowners move out and abandon the dwellings, thinking the foreclosure process is completed or near completion. Zombie titles come to life after the foreclosure is finished but the lender returns with a motion to set aside the judgment.

Allen Superior Judge Nancy Eshcoff Boyer has seen the zombie homes in Fort Wayne neighborhoods and the attempts to create zombie titles in her courtroom.

“It’s getting to be a bigger problem,” Boyer said of zombie titles.

Motions to set aside a foreclosure judgment are coming anywhere from three months to, in one instance, seven years after the decrees were issued. The reasons given for the motion can be cryptic, so after she and her clerks became suspicious, Boyer started to routinely schedule hearings to find out why the lenders want to vacate the judgment.

Asking questions, Boyer said, is helping to prevent these homes from becoming problems for the community. Often in a foreclosure, the borrower will leave the house and with no one maintaining the property, the grass becomes overgrown, and vandals deface and strip the home.

The house then becomes a blight on the neighborhood. Eventually, the property will deteriorate to the point where the municipality has to demolish the home, which costs the taxpayers.

“That is really the reason I’m looking at these (motions) because I don’t want (the houses) thrown back on our community,” Boyer said.

Nobody’s home

Indiana is a leader nationwide in the percentage of foreclosed homes being vacated by owners.

manier Manier

The Hoosier state ranked ninth in January 2014 in the number of properties in foreclosure at 14,503, according to statistics from RealtyTrac, a California-based company that reviews housing data from across the country. However, with 31 percent of those homes vacated by the owner, Indiana has the seventh-highest number of zombie homes.

From September 2013 to January 2014, Indiana’s percentage of owner-vacated homes had declined by 12 percent.

In many instances what homeowners might not realize is that even though the bank foreclosed and they moved out, they still own the property.

Fox encountered this situation when a woman walked into Notre Dame’s Economic Justice Project, the consumer clinic that Fox supervises, with a notice from the city of South Bend that her home was in violation of building codes. The client explained she had appeared in St. Joseph Superior Court two years earlier and agreed to the foreclosure. When she received the notice of the upcoming sheriff’s sale set for June 2007, she moved.

Assuming the city had made a mistake, Fox made a phone call to resolve the matter but discovered there was no mistake. The lender had the court set aside the judgment and the homeowner was never notified. The woman who thought the foreclosure was finished learned she was, in fact, still responsible for the property.

Like her colleague in Allen County, St. Joseph Superior Judge Jenny Pitts Manier has been dealing with a “steady stream” of motions to set aside foreclosure judgments. Her approach has changed from assuming the motion means the foreclosure has been remedied by either a settlement or a short sale to getting a legal basis for the filing.

“My concern is people are evicted from their homes and then we’re saying, ‘Oh, forget it,’” Manier said.

If the motion does not provide a reason why the lender is filing or if the reason is vague, Manier finds time on her calendar to bring the attorneys to the courtroom.

“In this environment, it’s not a bad idea to set a hearing,” she said.

Adhering to the rules

The Office of the Indiana Attorney General has occasionally received complaints about zombie titles but currently there is little legal recourse available if the lender starts but does not complete the foreclosure proceeding and leaves the house in limbo.

Bryan Corbin, spokesman for the attorney general’s office, acknowledged the negative ramifications for neighborhoods and homeowners. He also pointed out that under current law, lenders are not legally obligated to inform the mortgage holders the foreclosure judgment has been dismissed or the process stopped.

In her research, Fox has found that lenders rarely supply reasons, let aloneaccurate ones, for wanting to set aside a foreclosure judgment. Most commonly, the language implied a settlement had been reached with the homeowner.

fox Fox

Both Boyer and Manier said they will vacate judgments when the lender and homeowner have crafted an alternative to foreclosure or when the reason satisfies Trial Rule 60(B), which spells out the valid reasons – such as mistake, fraud or to correct error – for setting aside a decree.

Unless Boyer and Manier receive the proper legal grounds, they will not set aside the judgment.

When Boyer began scheduling hearings, she met resistance. Lenders called her, asking why she was doing such a thing. The pushback reminded the Allen County judge of the opposition she got from lenders during the height of the foreclosure crisis who complained the state-required settlement conferences were ruining their business models.

Hearings may prevent lenders from tossing abandoned houses onto the shoulders of the community but, Boyer said, they do have a consequence for the courts. Namely, scrutinizing the motions and holding hearings use judicial time and resources, which are limited.

Still, she has noted since she started setting hearing dates, she is getting more answers to her questions about the motions to set aside. And that, she believes, translates into the courts helping to stop the zombies.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I have been on this program while on parole from 2011-2013. No person should be forced mentally to share private details of their personal life with total strangers. Also giving permission for a mental therapist to report to your parole agent that your not participating in group therapy because you don't have the financial mean to be in the group therapy. I was personally singled out and sent back three times for not having money and also sent back within the six month when you aren't to be sent according to state law. I will work to het this INSOMM's removed from this state. I also had twelve or thirteen parole agents with a fifteen month period. Thanks for your time.

  2. Our nation produces very few jurists of the caliber of Justice DOUGLAS and his peers these days. Here is that great civil libertarian, who recognized government as both a blessing and, when corrupted by ideological interests, a curse: "Once the investigator has only the conscience of government as a guide, the conscience can become ‘ravenous,’ as Cromwell, bent on destroying Thomas More, said in Bolt, A Man For All Seasons (1960), p. 120. The First Amendment mirrors many episodes where men, harried and harassed by government, sought refuge in their conscience, as these lines of Thomas More show: ‘MORE: And when we stand before God, and you are sent to Paradise for doing according to your conscience, *575 and I am damned for not doing according to mine, will you come with me, for fellowship? ‘CRANMER: So those of us whose names are there are damned, Sir Thomas? ‘MORE: I don't know, Your Grace. I have no window to look into another man's conscience. I condemn no one. ‘CRANMER: Then the matter is capable of question? ‘MORE: Certainly. ‘CRANMER: But that you owe obedience to your King is not capable of question. So weigh a doubt against a certainty—and sign. ‘MORE: Some men think the Earth is round, others think it flat; it is a matter capable of question. But if it is flat, will the King's command make it round? And if it is round, will the King's command flatten it? No, I will not sign.’ Id., pp. 132—133. DOUGLAS THEN WROTE: Where government is the Big Brother,11 privacy gives way to surveillance. **909 But our commitment is otherwise. *576 By the First Amendment we have staked our security on freedom to promote a multiplicity of ideas, to associate at will with kindred spirits, and to defy governmental intrusion into these precincts" Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Comm., 372 U.S. 539, 574-76, 83 S. Ct. 889, 908-09, 9 L. Ed. 2d 929 (1963) Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring. I write: Happy Memorial Day to all -- God please bless our fallen who lived and died to preserve constitutional governance in our wonderful series of Republics. And God open the eyes of those government officials who denounce the constitutions of these Republics by arbitrary actions arising out capricious motives.

  3. From back in the day before secularism got a stranglehold on Hoosier jurists comes this great excerpt via Indiana federal court judge Allan Sharp, dedicated to those many Indiana government attorneys (with whom I have dealt) who count the law as a mere tool, an optional tool that is not to be used when political correctness compels a more acceptable result than merely following the path that the law directs: ALLEN SHARP, District Judge. I. In a scene following a visit by Henry VIII to the home of Sir Thomas More, playwriter Robert Bolt puts the following words into the mouths of his characters: Margaret: Father, that man's bad. MORE: There is no law against that. ROPER: There is! God's law! MORE: Then God can arrest him. ROPER: Sophistication upon sophistication! MORE: No, sheer simplicity. The law, Roper, the law. I know what's legal not what's right. And I'll stick to what's legal. ROPER: Then you set man's law above God's! MORE: No, far below; but let me draw your attention to a fact I'm not God. The currents and eddies of right and wrong, which you find such plain sailing, I can't navigate. I'm no voyager. But in the thickets of law, oh, there I'm a forester. I doubt if there's a man alive who could follow me there, thank God... ALICE: (Exasperated, pointing after Rich) While you talk, he's gone! MORE: And go he should, if he was the Devil himself, until he broke the law! ROPER: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law! MORE: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? ROPER: I'd cut down every law in England to do that! MORE: (Roused and excited) Oh? (Advances on Roper) And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you where would you hide, Roper, the laws being flat? (He leaves *1257 him) This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast man's laws, not God's and if you cut them down and you're just the man to do it d'you really think you would stand upright in the winds that would blow then? (Quietly) Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake. ROPER: I have long suspected this; this is the golden calf; the law's your god. MORE: (Wearily) Oh, Roper, you're a fool, God's my god... (Rather bitterly) But I find him rather too (Very bitterly) subtle... I don't know where he is nor what he wants. ROPER: My God wants service, to the end and unremitting; nothing else! MORE: (Dryly) Are you sure that's God! He sounds like Moloch. But indeed it may be God And whoever hunts for me, Roper, God or Devil, will find me hiding in the thickets of the law! And I'll hide my daughter with me! Not hoist her up the mainmast of your seagoing principles! They put about too nimbly! (Exit More. They all look after him). Pgs. 65-67, A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS A Play in Two Acts, Robert Bolt, Random House, New York, 1960. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, Indianapolis, for defendants. Childs v. Duckworth, 509 F. Supp. 1254, 1256 (N.D. Ind. 1981) aff'd, 705 F.2d 915 (7th Cir. 1983)

  4. "Meanwhile small- and mid-size firms are getting squeezed and likely will not survive unless they become a boutique firm." I've been a business attorney in small, and now mid-size firm for over 30 years, and for over 30 years legal consultants have been preaching this exact same mantra of impending doom for small and mid-sized firms -- verbatim. This claim apparently helps them gin up merger opportunities from smaller firms who become convinced that they need to become larger overnight. The claim that large corporations are interested in cost-saving and efficiency has likewise been preached for decades, and is likewise bunk. If large corporations had any real interest in saving money they wouldn't use large law firms whose rates are substantially higher than those of high-quality mid-sized firms.

  5. The family is the foundation of all human government. That is the Grand Design. Modern governments throw off this Design and make bureaucratic war against the family, as does Hollywood and cultural elitists such as third wave feminists. Since WWII we have been on a ship of fools that way, with both the elite and government and their social engineering hacks relentlessly attacking the very foundation of social order. And their success? See it in the streets of Fergusson, on the food stamp doles (mostly broken families)and in the above article. Reject the Grand Design for true social function, enter the Glorious State to manage social dysfunction. Our Brave New World will be a prison camp, and we will welcome it as the only way to manage given the anarchy without it.

ADVERTISEMENT