ILNews

Robel and Fruehwald honored by Barnes & Thornburg

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

At a special gathering Wednesday, attorney Scott Barnhart pointed out the legacy of the late Shirley Shideler – women lawyers are now commonplace in the legal profession.

Barnhart, representing the Indiana Bar Foundation at the event, said he practices with so many female attorneys that he forgets individuals like Shideler had to break down the obstacles that were blocking women from entering the profession.

Barnes & Thornburg LLP honored its former colleague Shideler at the second annual Shirley’s Legacy reception at the firm’s Indianapolis office. As part of the evening event, Lauren Robel, provost of Indiana University in Bloomington and executive vice president of Indiana University, and Kristin Fruehwald, retired of counsel at Barnes & Thornburg, were recognized for their contributions to the legal profession.

Shideler became the first female at any major law firm in Indiana when she joined Barnes & Thornburg as an associate attorney in 1964. In 1971, she was promoted to partner, becoming the first woman to join the partner ranks at a large Indiana firm. Then in 1998, she became the first women president of the Indiana Bar Foundation.  

“She wasn’t just a good legal mentor, she was a great lifestyle mentor,” said Fruehwald, who during her career at Barnes & Thornburg worked closely with Shideler. “She struggled. She was a single parent, she had a daughter, she had a lovely mother that helped her out but, you know, her life was harder than mine. I think she made sure that my life wasn’t as hard as it could have been.”

During the reception, Barnes partner Nicholas Kile presented the awards to Robel and Fruehwald and highlighted their accomplishments. He recalled as a student in Robel’s constitutional law class, he was inspired by her passion for the law. He described Fruehwald as exemplifying what it means to be an excellent lawyer.

Robel served as the first female dean of Indiana University Maurer School of Law from 2003 until she was named interim provost at IU Bloomington in 2011. She was inspired to pursue a career in the law by watching the fight for Civil Rights unfold around her home in Alabama in the mid-1960s.

“I loved it so much and I felt so privileged to be able to study the law,” Robel said. “There were always places along the way where I was the only woman in the room but that was just a condition of the time. I always felt that gave me a possibility to open the door for others.”

Shideler had been a legal secretary at Barnes prior to becoming an attorney. She continued to work at the firm while she went to law school at night and raised her daughter.

Robel feels a kinship to Shideler because she, too, had a daughter and worked while studying the law. She said honoring Shideler’s trailblazing career is important because it gives new attorneys, both women and men, a reminder that they can overcome any hardship.

Fruehwald joined the legal profession after a career as a special education teacher. Being a lawyer was something she always wanted and despite her father’s objections, she eventually decided to go to law school.

“I have enjoyed it and I would encourage women to go into the law,” she said. “I don’t see this as being a bad place for women at all. I see this as a welcoming place and a place where there are opportunities.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Call it unauthorized law if you must, a regulatory wrong, but it was fraud and theft well beyond that, a seeming crime! "In three specific cases, the hearing officer found that Westerfield did little to no work for her clients but only issued a partial refund or no refund at all." That is theft by deception, folks. "In its decision to suspend Westerfield, the Supreme Court noted that she already had a long disciplinary history dating back to 1996 and had previously been suspended in 2004 and indefinitely suspended in 2005. She was reinstated in 2009 after finally giving the commission a response to the grievance for which she was suspended in 2004." WOW -- was the Indiana Supreme Court complicit in her fraud? Talk about being on notice of a real bad actor .... "Further, the justices noted that during her testimony, Westerfield was “disingenuous and evasive” about her relationship with Tope and attempted to distance herself from him. They also wrote that other aggravating factors existed in Westerfield’s case, such as her lack of remorse." WOW, and yet she only got 18 months on the bench, and if she shows up and cries for them in a year and a half, and pays money to JLAP for group therapy ... back in to ride roughshod over hapless clients (or are they "marks") once again! Aint Hoosier lawyering a great money making adventure!!! Just live for the bucks, even if filthy lucre, and come out a-ok. ME on the other hand??? Lifetime banishment for blowing the whistle on unconstitutional governance. Yes, had I ripped off clients or had ANY disciplinary history for doing that I would have fared better, most likely, as that it would have revealed me motivated by Mammon and not Faith. Check it out if you doubt my reading of this, compare and contrast the above 18 months with my lifetime banishment from court, see appendix for Bar Examiners report which the ISC adopted without substantive review: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS

  2. Wow, over a quarter million dollars? That is a a lot of commissary money! Over what time frame? Years I would guess. Anyone ever try to blow the whistle? Probably not, since most Hoosiers who take notice of such things realize that Hoosier whistleblowers are almost always pilloried. If someone did blow the whistle, they were likely fired. The persecution of whistleblowers is a sure sign of far too much government corruption. Details of my own personal experience at the top of Hoosier governance available upon request ... maybe a "fake news" media outlet will have the courage to tell the stories of Hoosier whistleblowers that the "real" Hoosier media (cough) will not deign to touch. (They are part of the problem.)

  3. So if I am reading it right, only if and when African American college students agree to receive checks labeling them as "Negroes" do they receive aid from the UNCF or the Quaker's Educational Fund? In other words, to borrow from the Indiana Appellate Court, "the [nonprofit] supposed to be [their] advocate, refers to [students] in a racially offensive manner. While there is no evidence that [the nonprofits] intended harm to [African American students], the harm was nonetheless inflicted. [Black students are] presented to [academia and future employers] in a racially offensive manner. For these reasons, [such] performance [is] deficient and also prejudice[ial]." Maybe even DEPLORABLE???

  4. I'm the poor soul who spent over 10 years in prison with many many other prisoners trying to kill me for being charged with a sex offense THAT I DID NOT COMMIT i was in jail for a battery charge for helping a friend leave a boyfriend who beat her I've been saying for over 28 years that i did not and would never hurt a child like that mine or anybody's child but NOBODY wants to believe that i might not be guilty of this horrible crime or think that when i say that ALL the paperwork concerning my conviction has strangely DISAPPEARED or even when the long beach judge re-sentenced me over 14 months on a already filed plea bargain out of another districts court then had it filed under a fake name so i could not find while trying to fight my conviction on appeal in a nut shell people are ALWAYS quick to believe the worst about some one well I DID NOT HURT ANY CHILD EVER IN MY LIFE AND HAVE SAID THIS FOR ALMOST 30 YEARS please if anybody can me get some kind of justice it would be greatly appreciated respectfully written wrongly accused Brian Valenti

  5. A high ranking Indiana supreme Court operative caught red handed leading a group using the uber offensive N word! She must denounce or be denounced! (Or not since she is an insider ... rules do not apply to them). Evidence here: http://m.indianacompanies.us/friends-educational-fund-for-negroes.364110.company.v2#top_info

ADVERTISEMENT