ILNews

Rucker retires after 26 years on appellate bench

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
rucker-051717-15col.jpg Now-retired Justice Robert Rucker says he was humbled and touched by friends’ and colleagues’ tributes to his career. (Photo courtesy of the Indiana Supreme Court)

Ask a member of the Indiana judiciary to describe former Indiana Supreme Court Justice Robert Rucker, and you’ll get answers such as “empathetic” or “compassionate.” And those who sat on either side of Rucker during his nearly 18 years on the state’s highest bench say the now-retired justice never let his sense of humanity outweigh the rule of law.

In fact, fellow former Justice Frank Sullivan Jr. said one of the qualities he most admired in Rucker was his ability to follow where the law took him, regardless of his personal feelings toward a case. But now, after a quarter-century career of striving to place justice above ideology, the longtime jurist has left the stat Supreme Court.

Rucker retired from the court May 12, after serving as one of the five final arbiters in Indiana’s legal system since 1999. His appellate career, which began with a seat on the Indiana Court of Appeals in 1991, included work with 23 Court of Appeals judges and eight justices, as well as authorship of roughly 1,250 majority opinions.

In a ceremony earlier this month to commemorate Rucker’s career, legal professionals who have worked with and for Rucker said those opinions provide insight into a legal mind that is wise, eloquent and insightful. Both Sullivan and Traci Cosby, Rucker’s most recent law clerk who paid tribute to his career during the retirement ceremony, mentioned Rucker’s majority opinion in Alexander J. Anglemyer v. State of Indiana as one of his most significant contributions to Indiana jurisprudence.

Additionally, Sullivan also pointed to three other Rucker majority opinions — Ronnie Holden v. State of Indiana, Clinic for Women, Inc. v. Carl J. Brizzi, and Sophia Willis v. State of Indiana — that dealt with issues of jury nullification, abortion, and parental discipline, respectively, as evidence of Rucker’s ability to focus only on the law, even when dealing with highly partisan issues.

“He’s the ideal appellate judge,” Sullivan said.

Aside from his work specific to the Supreme Court, Rucker’s retirement ceremony also honored his contributions to the entire legal system. Chief among those contributions were Rucker’s work toward promoting diversity throughout the judiciary, with Anne-Marie Clarke, chair-elect of the National Bar Association Judicial Council, calling the retired justice a role model for black males on par with other prominent black men such as former President Barack Obama.

Rucker’s retirement will leave the Supreme Court without racial diversity, as the three finalists for his spot on the bench are white. But even though racial minorities will no longer be physically represented on the court, Cosby credited Rucker with helping to develop initiatives, such as the Indiana Conference for Legal Education Opportunity, that will ensure women and people of color will have a place in the judiciary for years to come.

Rucker’s departure from the bench also leaves the court without his institutional knowledge, which he acquired on both the Court of Appeals and Supreme Court. Now, Justice Steven David assumes the position of the most-senior justice with seven years of experience.

Gov. Eric Holcomb presented Rucker the Sagamore of the Wabash, one of the state’s highest honors, at the ceremony. Holcomb assured Rucker the state would continue to call upon him for his wisdom and counsel in the years to come. But Sullivan, who noted this is now the first time in roughly 65 years the court’s most-senior justice has had seven years of experience or less, said the bench without Rucker is comprised of a talented group of justices with significant trial court experience that will enable them to successfully carry on the work of the court.

Though Rucker, 70, has already retired, celebrations in his honor continue. The Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, for example, is hosting “A Salute to Justice Robert D. Rucker’s Contributions to Indiana Law” on May 24. The program will include panel discussions featuring several of Rucker’s former law clerks, and will also include a “conference” meeting of Rucker, Sullivan, former Chief Justices Randall Shepard and Brent Dickson and former Justice Theodore Boehm.

Led by Shepard as their chief, those five justices served together for 11 years, from the time Rucker joined the bench in 1999 to the time David replaced Boehm in 2010. During those 11 years, Rucker, as the most-junior justice, was always required to speak first during the court’s conference meetings to decide cases. In keeping with that tradition, Sullivan said the reunion of the five justices at IU McKinney — the first time all five men will have been together since Boehm’s retirement — will once again require Rucker to open the conversation by speaking about his time on the bench first.

As he reminisced about his years of service to the Indiana judiciary at his retirement ceremony, Rucker said he was awed so many of his friends and colleagues had gathered to honor his career.

“On more than one occasion, I’ve had to glance to my left and right and think, ‘Are they talking about me?’” Rucker told the crowd that filled the Indiana Supreme Court courtroom.

As his brother, Gregory Rucker, surprised the crowd by singing excerpts of Rev. Don Johnson’s “I Can’t Complain,” Justice Rucker interjected his personal thoughts along with the lyrics. When Gregory Rucker sang, “I’ve had good days,” the justice noted, “A 5-0 opinion is a good day.” But when his brother began to sing about having hills to climb, Rucker wryly mused, “I wonder if I can get Justice David’s vote on this?”

Then, bringing his appellate career full circle, Chief Justice Loretta Rush had one final surprise for Rucker — an a capella performance of “My Country ’Tis of Thee” by students from Herron High School in Indianapolis. That was the song former Valparaiso University Law School Dean Edward Gaffney sang at Rucker’s robing ceremony, and as the justice listened to the performance in his honor, he shook his head in awe as he enjoyed his final moments on the Supreme Court bench.

“What better way to close the event than the choir leading us in singing ‘My Country ’Tis of Thee,’” Rucker said in a statement after the ceremony. “Their harmonizing voices were incredible. I will long cherish the memory of this ceremony and look forward to an active retirement.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. One can only wonder whether Mr. Kimmel was paid for his work by Mr. Burgh ... or whether that bill fell to the citizens of Indiana, many of whom cannot afford attorneys for important matters. It really doesn't take a judge(s) to know that "pavement" can be considered a deadly weapon. It only takes a brain and some education or thought. I'm glad to see the conviction was upheld although sorry to see that the asphalt could even be considered "an issue".

  2. In response to bryanjbrown: thank you for your comment. I am familiar with Paul Ogden (and applaud his assistance to Shirley Justice) and have read of Gary Welsh's (strange) death (and have visited his blog on many occasions). I am not familiar with you (yet). I lived in Kosciusko county, where the sheriff was just removed after pleading in what seems a very "sweetheart" deal. Unfortunately, something NEEDS to change since the attorneys won't (en masse) stand up for ethics (rather making a show to please the "rules" and apparently the judges). I read that many attorneys are underemployed. Seems wisdom would be to cull the herd and get rid of the rotting apples in practice and on the bench, for everyone's sake as well as justice. I'd like to file an attorney complaint, but I have little faith in anything (other than the most flagrant and obvious) resulting in action. My own belief is that if this was medicine, there'd be maimed and injured all over and the carnage caused by "the profession" would be difficult to hide. One can dream ... meanwhile, back to figuring out to file a pro se "motion to dismiss" as well as another court required paper that Indiana is so fond of providing NO resources for (unlike many other states, who don't automatically assume that citizens involved in the court process are scumbags) so that maybe I can get the family law attorney - whose work left me with no settlement, no possessions and resulted in the death of two pets (etc ad nauseum) - to stop abusing the proceedings supplemental and small claims rules and using it as a vehicle for harassment and apparently, amusement.

  3. Been on social security sense sept 2011 2massive strokes open heart surgery and serious ovarian cancer and a blood clot in my lung all in 14 months. Got a letter in may saying that i didn't qualify and it was in form like i just applied ,called social security she said it don't make sense and you are still geting a check in june and i did ,now i get a check from my part D asking for payment for july because there will be no money for my membership, call my prescription coverage part D and confirmed no check will be there.went to social security they didn't want to answer whats going on just said i should of never been on it .no one knows where this letter came from was California im in virginia and been here sense my strokes and vcu filed for my disability i was in the hospital when they did it .It's like it was a error . My ,mothers social security was being handled in that office in California my sister was dealing with it and it had my social security number because she died last year and this letter came out of the same office and it came at the same time i got the letter for my mother benefits for death and they had the same date of being typed just one was on the mail Saturday and one on Monday. . I think it's a mistake and it should been fixed instead there just getting rid of me .i never got a formal letter saying when i was being tsken off.

  4. Employers should not have racially discriminating mind set. It has huge impact on the society what the big players do or don't do in the industry. Background check is conducted just to verify whether information provided by the prospective employee is correct or not. It doesn't have any direct combination with the rejection of the employees. If there is rejection, there should be something effective and full-proof things on the table that may keep the company or the people associated with it in jeopardy.

  5. Unlike the federal judge who refused to protect me, the Virginia State Bar gave me a hearing. After the hearing, the Virginia State Bar refused to discipline me. VSB said that attacking me with the court ADA coordinator had, " all the grace and charm of a drive-by shooting." One does wonder why the VSB was able to have a hearing and come to that conclusion, but the federal judge in Indiana slammed the door of the courthouse in my face.

ADVERTISEMENT