ILNews

Running toward a stable life

Kate Buckley
February 15, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

When attorney Leona Frank attended an orientation for the Back on My Feet program in the summer of 2011, it was out of curiosity.

“When I first heard about it,” said Frank, “I thought, ‘Helping the homeless through running?’ How could that work?”

rehab Snow didn’t stop Back on My Feet participant Keith Brown from leading attorney volunteers Leona Frank, in purple, and David Jose, in green vest, and other volunteers and participants on a 5:45 a.m. run Feb. 8. Runs three mornings per week are mandatory for BoMF program members. (IL photo/Kelly Lucas)

Frank learned that Back on My Feet is a nonprofit group founded in Philadelphia in 2007 by Anne Mahlum, a runner. Mahlum’s goal was to promote independence for people who are homeless, in part through the discipline and confidence that can come from the consistence of regularly scheduled runs.

BoMF now has chapters in 10 cities, including Indianapolis, whose chapter was started in March 2011. The group consists of resident members who live in halfway houses and non-resident members who volunteer to help facilitate the morning runs. If resident members meet the 90 percent attendance goal in their Monday-Wednesday-Friday morning runs, after 30 days, they become eligible for incentives and financial aid to help build a more stable life.

Currently, Indianapolis has two teams associated with two halfway houses, and a third facility will be launched later this month. New members are brought in every 30 days. According to Lindsey Hein, director of communications and corporate relations for BoMF-Indianapolis, about 50 percent of

new resident-members stay committed for their first 30 days. Teams are kept to about 12 to 15 resident members so that the members can feel comfortable with each other and know one another by name.

Frank had been a runner for about four years when she heard about Back on My Feet. She began running for the health benefits and became more aware of the community and lifestyle benefits along the way, serving for a time as legal counsel for the Indy Runners group.

What Frank has gained through her involvement in BoMF has been an appreciation for recovery and an understanding of “what a disease [addiction] really is,” she said. She has grown to admire the resident members of her team.

“The people in the organization have taught me to be non-judgmental,” Frank said.

Frank met resident member Keith Brown through her involvement in BoMF. Frank and Brown ran together two to three times a week for about two months before each discovered the other was a lawyer. A former Ohio attorney who worked as a public defender for 20 years and had his own practice for seven years, Brown has battled with alcohol abuse. Brown is a resident of Progress House, a halfway house for Indianapolis adults with addictions. He’s found both the networking support and the physical fitness aspects of BoMF to be essential in his journey. He graduated from Progress House before, but fell back into a lifestyle involving unhealthy use of alcohol. He said BoMF has made all the difference in his recovery this time around.

“Recovery is all about body, mind and spirit,” Brown said. “When you take care of your body, the mind does follow.”

Although he’s now running five or six miles comfortably, Brown said he would have laughed if someone had suggested he would make it to that level when he first began running with BoMF in August 2011. Brown found the exercise and mental discipline from both the regular runs and the volunteer-provided yoga to be so helpful that he now attends yoga classes, although he’s no longer able to attend the free classes offered on Wednesday nights at Progress House because he’s working during that time. Brown works for Citizens Action Coalition in a position that allows him to use his legal and organizational skills.

“Ultimately, what we want is to partner our resident members with jobs,” Hein said. Although Brown didn’t directly receive his current job contact from BoMF, he nonetheless feels his involvement in the organization assisted in leading to the confidence that made this job possible. Dentist Nicole Van Le does pro bono dental work for resident members, and Brown has received a significant amount of dental work from Van Le. He said he wouldn’t have been able to complete the face-to-face interactions necessary for his new job without this assistance.

“[BoMF] really provides benefits for volunteers as well as the residents,” said David Jose, partner at Krieg DeVault. Jose has been team leader at Progress House since around Thanksgiving of last year. The role of the team leader is to attend the morning runs, motivate and support team members, and communicate information to both non-resident and resident members. The team leader ensures the team works together.

Jose became involved in BoMF in the spring of 2011. Within a week of hearing about the Indianapolis chapter, he received a notice about the 50th anniversary of Progress House. He was familiar with the halfway house from his work representing doctors and nurses with addiction issues. A longtime runner, Jose appreciates how much team members are able to learn from each other.

It’s a sentiment that both Frank and Brown echo.

“I’ve volunteered for a lot of organizations in the community, but it’s never hit home this way before,” Frank said. “It’s become so much more than what I expected my experience to be with it.”

The team motto is “nobody runs alone,” Brown said, and that support extends far beyond the morning run. “I cannot tell you what a great group of people these folks are.”

For information about volunteering for the Indianapolis chapter of Back on My Feet, visit http://indianapolis.backonmyfeet.org/indianapolis-landing.html.•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I have been on this program while on parole from 2011-2013. No person should be forced mentally to share private details of their personal life with total strangers. Also giving permission for a mental therapist to report to your parole agent that your not participating in group therapy because you don't have the financial mean to be in the group therapy. I was personally singled out and sent back three times for not having money and also sent back within the six month when you aren't to be sent according to state law. I will work to het this INSOMM's removed from this state. I also had twelve or thirteen parole agents with a fifteen month period. Thanks for your time.

  2. Our nation produces very few jurists of the caliber of Justice DOUGLAS and his peers these days. Here is that great civil libertarian, who recognized government as both a blessing and, when corrupted by ideological interests, a curse: "Once the investigator has only the conscience of government as a guide, the conscience can become ‘ravenous,’ as Cromwell, bent on destroying Thomas More, said in Bolt, A Man For All Seasons (1960), p. 120. The First Amendment mirrors many episodes where men, harried and harassed by government, sought refuge in their conscience, as these lines of Thomas More show: ‘MORE: And when we stand before God, and you are sent to Paradise for doing according to your conscience, *575 and I am damned for not doing according to mine, will you come with me, for fellowship? ‘CRANMER: So those of us whose names are there are damned, Sir Thomas? ‘MORE: I don't know, Your Grace. I have no window to look into another man's conscience. I condemn no one. ‘CRANMER: Then the matter is capable of question? ‘MORE: Certainly. ‘CRANMER: But that you owe obedience to your King is not capable of question. So weigh a doubt against a certainty—and sign. ‘MORE: Some men think the Earth is round, others think it flat; it is a matter capable of question. But if it is flat, will the King's command make it round? And if it is round, will the King's command flatten it? No, I will not sign.’ Id., pp. 132—133. DOUGLAS THEN WROTE: Where government is the Big Brother,11 privacy gives way to surveillance. **909 But our commitment is otherwise. *576 By the First Amendment we have staked our security on freedom to promote a multiplicity of ideas, to associate at will with kindred spirits, and to defy governmental intrusion into these precincts" Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Comm., 372 U.S. 539, 574-76, 83 S. Ct. 889, 908-09, 9 L. Ed. 2d 929 (1963) Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring. I write: Happy Memorial Day to all -- God please bless our fallen who lived and died to preserve constitutional governance in our wonderful series of Republics. And God open the eyes of those government officials who denounce the constitutions of these Republics by arbitrary actions arising out capricious motives.

  3. From back in the day before secularism got a stranglehold on Hoosier jurists comes this great excerpt via Indiana federal court judge Allan Sharp, dedicated to those many Indiana government attorneys (with whom I have dealt) who count the law as a mere tool, an optional tool that is not to be used when political correctness compels a more acceptable result than merely following the path that the law directs: ALLEN SHARP, District Judge. I. In a scene following a visit by Henry VIII to the home of Sir Thomas More, playwriter Robert Bolt puts the following words into the mouths of his characters: Margaret: Father, that man's bad. MORE: There is no law against that. ROPER: There is! God's law! MORE: Then God can arrest him. ROPER: Sophistication upon sophistication! MORE: No, sheer simplicity. The law, Roper, the law. I know what's legal not what's right. And I'll stick to what's legal. ROPER: Then you set man's law above God's! MORE: No, far below; but let me draw your attention to a fact I'm not God. The currents and eddies of right and wrong, which you find such plain sailing, I can't navigate. I'm no voyager. But in the thickets of law, oh, there I'm a forester. I doubt if there's a man alive who could follow me there, thank God... ALICE: (Exasperated, pointing after Rich) While you talk, he's gone! MORE: And go he should, if he was the Devil himself, until he broke the law! ROPER: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law! MORE: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? ROPER: I'd cut down every law in England to do that! MORE: (Roused and excited) Oh? (Advances on Roper) And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you where would you hide, Roper, the laws being flat? (He leaves *1257 him) This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast man's laws, not God's and if you cut them down and you're just the man to do it d'you really think you would stand upright in the winds that would blow then? (Quietly) Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake. ROPER: I have long suspected this; this is the golden calf; the law's your god. MORE: (Wearily) Oh, Roper, you're a fool, God's my god... (Rather bitterly) But I find him rather too (Very bitterly) subtle... I don't know where he is nor what he wants. ROPER: My God wants service, to the end and unremitting; nothing else! MORE: (Dryly) Are you sure that's God! He sounds like Moloch. But indeed it may be God And whoever hunts for me, Roper, God or Devil, will find me hiding in the thickets of the law! And I'll hide my daughter with me! Not hoist her up the mainmast of your seagoing principles! They put about too nimbly! (Exit More. They all look after him). Pgs. 65-67, A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS A Play in Two Acts, Robert Bolt, Random House, New York, 1960. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, Indianapolis, for defendants. Childs v. Duckworth, 509 F. Supp. 1254, 1256 (N.D. Ind. 1981) aff'd, 705 F.2d 915 (7th Cir. 1983)

  4. "Meanwhile small- and mid-size firms are getting squeezed and likely will not survive unless they become a boutique firm." I've been a business attorney in small, and now mid-size firm for over 30 years, and for over 30 years legal consultants have been preaching this exact same mantra of impending doom for small and mid-sized firms -- verbatim. This claim apparently helps them gin up merger opportunities from smaller firms who become convinced that they need to become larger overnight. The claim that large corporations are interested in cost-saving and efficiency has likewise been preached for decades, and is likewise bunk. If large corporations had any real interest in saving money they wouldn't use large law firms whose rates are substantially higher than those of high-quality mid-sized firms.

  5. The family is the foundation of all human government. That is the Grand Design. Modern governments throw off this Design and make bureaucratic war against the family, as does Hollywood and cultural elitists such as third wave feminists. Since WWII we have been on a ship of fools that way, with both the elite and government and their social engineering hacks relentlessly attacking the very foundation of social order. And their success? See it in the streets of Fergusson, on the food stamp doles (mostly broken families)and in the above article. Reject the Grand Design for true social function, enter the Glorious State to manage social dysfunction. Our Brave New World will be a prison camp, and we will welcome it as the only way to manage given the anarchy without it.

ADVERTISEMENT