ILNews

Sidebars: Savor the taste of Italy in Shelby County

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

On a recent trip to Shelby County two restaurants caught my eye, each bearing the same name – Panzarotti’s Italian Café – and logo and each curiously situated less than a block apart in downtown Shelbyville. One sits at 20 S. Harrison just off the circle while the other sits directly on the circle. Parking dictated that I stop at the 20 S. Harrison location for my relatively late lunch.

I found a charming, cleanly decorated restaurant. The tables sat drenched with the traditional red/white checkerboard tablecloths offset by the black/white checkerboard tiled floor. The cheerful waitress brought me a menu, and I inquired over the difference between a panzarotti and a calzone. Both are pretty much the same in my book, best described as a large Italian bread turnover stuffed with ingredients of choice, typically those that mirror pizza toppings. She advised the panzarotti is indeed like a calzone but it contains a bit more ricotta cheese. So after that explanation, my opinion remained unchanged.

The menu outlined a selection of panzarottis and calzones as well as hand-tossed and deep-dish pizzas, pastas, salads, and sandwiches. My waitress pointed out that the bread is homemade and when I told her I was torn between pizza and the Italian sub, she stated I couldn’t go wrong with either. I opted for the sub because the smallest size 14” pizza seemed a bit heavy for lunch. While they offer pizza by the slice, I was a bit skeptical in ordering sliced pizza at 2:30 in the afternoon.

I found the sub worthy of a return trip. It contained perfectly proportioned amounts of salami, ham, provolone, romaine lettuce, and sweet onions. The Italian dressing on the side was the one drawback of this sandwich as it was obviously an unremarkable bottled brand as opposed to what it could have been, that being a simple blend of olive oil, red wine vinegar, and oregano. While not a fan of warm sub sandwiches, the slight warmth of the sandwich added to its personality. I’d recommend a few pepperoncinis to accent the sandwich, but I was in no position to complain as it exceeded my expectations.

In preparing to write this article I checked out the Facebook page. Diners overwhelmingly and consistently rave about the lasagna. I don’t think I’ve ever ordered lasagna at a restaurant so I’ll have to bring Jenny back and make her order it and give me a bite. Next time for me will be the pizza. Given the quality of the homemade sub roll, I am sure the pizza crust will not disappoint.

I asked the waitress about the other restaurant. She said it is open and is much larger. The menu is the same, and it offers more space for a busy dining night or banquets. While operating two cloned-menu operations in such close proximity seems a questionable business model, I can confidently state the food quality can support it. So on your next visit to Shelbyville, take a break from the ordinary and help support a local downtown merchant. Oh, don’t forget the cannoli for dessert! Panzarotti’s Italian Café, 20 S. Harrison Street, Shelbyville, Ind. 46176. 317-392-7833. www.panzarottis.net.

Fred Vaiana and Jennifer M. Lukemeyer practice at Voyles Zahn Paul Hogan & Merriman in Indianapolis, focusing in criminal defense. Vaiana is a 1992 graduate of the John Marshall Law School in Chicago. Lukemeyer earned her J.D. from Southern Methodist University in 1994 and is active in the Indianapolis Bar Association, Indianapolis Inn of Courts, and the Teen Court Program. The opinions expressed in this column are the authors’.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. So that none are misinformed by my posting wihtout a non de plume here, please allow me to state that I am NOT an Indiana licensed attorney, although I am an Indiana resident approved to practice law and represent clients in Indiana's fed court of Nth Dist and before the 7th circuit. I remain licensed in KS, since 1996, no discipline. This must be clarified since the IN court records will reveal that I did sit for and pass the Indiana bar last February. Yet be not confused by the fact that I was so allowed to be tested .... I am not, to be clear in the service of my duty to be absolutely candid about this, I AM NOT a member of the Indiana bar, and might never be so licensed given my unrepented from errors of thought documented in this opinion, at fn2, which likely supports Mr Smith's initial post in this thread: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1592921.html

  2. When I served the State of Kansas as Deputy AG over Consumer Protection & Antitrust for four years, supervising 20 special agents and assistant attorneys general (back before the IBLE denied me the right to practice law in Indiana for not having the right stuff and pretty much crushed my legal career) we had a saying around the office: Resist the lure of the ring!!! It was a take off on Tolkiem, the idea that absolute power (I signed investigative subpoenas as a judge would in many other contexts, no need to show probable cause)could corrupt absolutely. We feared that we would overreach constitutional limits if not reminded, over and over, to be mindful to not do so. Our approach in so challenging one another was Madisonian, as the following quotes from the Father of our Constitution reveal: The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse. We are right to take alarm at the first experiment upon our liberties. I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations. Liberty may be endangered by the abuse of liberty, but also by the abuse of power. All men having power ought to be mistrusted. -- James Madison, Federalist Papers and other sources: http://www.constitution.org/jm/jm_quotes.htm RESIST THE LURE OF THE RING ALL YE WITH POLITICAL OR JUDICIAL POWER!

  3. My dear Mr Smith, I respect your opinions and much enjoy your posts here. We do differ on our view of the benefits and viability of the American Experiment in Ordered Liberty. While I do agree that it could be better, and that your points in criticism are well taken, Utopia does indeed mean nowhere. I think Madison, Jefferson, Adams and company got it about as good as it gets in a fallen post-Enlightenment social order. That said, a constitution only protects the citizens if it is followed. We currently have a bevy of public officials and judicial agents who believe that their subjectivism, their personal ideology, their elitist fears and concerns and cause celebs trump the constitutions of our forefathers. This is most troubling. More to follow in the next post on that subject.

  4. Yep I am not Bryan Brown. Bryan you appear to be a bigger believer in the Constitution than I am. Were I still a big believer then I might be using my real name like you. Personally, I am no longer a fan of secularism. I favor the confessional state. In religious mattes, it seems to me that social diversity is chaos and conflict, while uniformity is order and peace.... secularism has been imposed by America on other nations now by force and that has not exactly worked out very well.... I think the American historical experiment with disestablishmentarianism is withering on the vine before our eyes..... Since I do not know if that is OK for an officially licensed lawyer to say, I keep the nom de plume.

  5. I am compelled to announce that I am not posting under any Smith monikers here. That said, the post below does have a certain ring to it that sounds familiar to me: http://www.catholicnewworld.com/cnwonline/2014/0907/cardinal.aspx

ADVERTISEMENT