ILNews

Scholarships aim to boost diversity in law firms and other fields

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

In 2008, Haroon Anwar and Abhishek Dubé became the first two recipients of $10,000 diversity scholarships from Baker & Daniels. Recipients also receive summer associate positions with the firm – which Anwar a­nd Dubé said was of even greater value than the financial award.

The firm offered Anwar and Dubé full-time jobs at the end of their summer employment in 2009.

diversity Evelyn Gentry, Saolo Delgado, Haroon Anwar and Abhishek Dubé (left to right), say that Baker & Daniels diversity scholarships helped them launch their careers. Delgado, a 3L student, plans to the join the firm next year. The other three are associates with the firm. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

“If you look at big law firms, there just aren’t that many minorities in law firms and so to have a law firm go out on a limb and do something like this shows that we are serious about diversity,” Anwar said. “A lot of places say they’re committed to diversity, but it’s different to actually take action to back up what you’re saying. So I think that’s really important in terms of what the scholarship does.”

Embracing diversity

Baker & Daniels has offered the diversity scholarship each year since 2008. And the firm has a diversity committee and a Diversity and Pro Bono Manager, Brita Horvath.

In October, Baker & Daniels confirmed that it will merge with Minneapolis-based Faegre Benson, becoming Faegre Baker Daniels in 2012. Faegre Benson offers two $12,000 diversity scholarships each year, and Horvath said that was one of the many reasons the two firms felt they would make good partners.

“Diversity was an aspect of the due diligence for understanding the firm’s values, culture and interests,” she said. “It’s a source of pride and identity for all of our offices.”

Saulo Delgado, a 3L student at Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, was a 2011 diversity scholarship recipient. He plans to join the firm after graduation, Horvath said.

“Diversity is more than just picking candidates, it’s more of a process,” Delgado said. “And I think that Baker & Daniels understands that it’s a process … it’s a commitment of 10 to 20 years, until you can grow your base.”

Other initiatives

In 2009, Ice Miller established a $25,000 scholarship fund at Butler. The annual award amount is based on variable market factors and will be $1,200 for the 2012 school year. Each year, the award is presented to a student who will contribute to the diversity of the student body, by way of gender, religion, sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, national origin, age or disability.

Michael Blickman, a partner at Ice Miller, explained one of the reasons why the firm established the scholarship.

“It is definitely part of our culture, and when selecting a law firm, clients want to understand what a firm is committed to. We find that almost universally, clients are interested in knowing our diversity efforts,” he said.

One trend Ice Miller has noticed, Blickman observed, is the lack of diversity in science, technology, engineering and mathematic – known as STEM – careers.

“To me, there is a national crisis in that they are underrepresented in STEM degrees, and women are underrepresented in all levels. Diversity is an issue that should be important to all Americans, and all lawyers,” he said.

In 2009, Krieg DeVault partnered with Rolls-Royce to award a $5,000 general legal diversity scholarship to a law student. The firm also partnered with Cummins to award a $5,000 intellectual property diversity scholarship to a law student with interest in pursuing IP law. Linda Cooley, Krieg DeVault Diversity Committee chair, said that the firm tries to promote diversity, not just in the field of law, but in the community. The lawyers recognize that their clients are interested in working with a firm that supports diversity.

“We had a major build-out here … and in doing so, one of the things we asked our building committee to do was to try to increase the number of minority- and women-owned businesses to do some of that work,” she said.

blockman Blickman

In January 2012, Krieg DeVault will host a statewide meet-and-greet for Black Law Student associations. Mauri Miller, president of the BLSA at Notre Dame Law School, planned and organized the event. Miller is one of the 2012 recipients of the Baker & Daniels diversity scholarship.

The benefit for firms

Both Delgado and Evelyn Gentry – a 2010 Baker & Daniels diversity scholarship recipient – had intended to join a small firm until they learned about the Baker & Daniels opportunity.

“During law school, I was convinced that a small firm was going to be the best fit for me,” Gentry said. But after interviewing with Baker & Daniels and learning about the scholarship, she began to rethink her career goals.

“I thought, maybe a mid- to large-size firm would be a good fit possibly, and that was something I hadn’t considered before,” she said. “I had a choice for summer in 2010 between Baker & Daniels and a smaller firm, and I just remember making my decision based on (thinking) – these people are really serious about diversity, they’re putting their money where their mouth is and I felt they were committed to it.”

Gentry is an associate in the firm’s labor and employment group.

Delgado also thought that his calling was at a small firm.

“The reason I came to law school is because I wanted to help the Hispanic community and I thought that the best way to do that was to go to a small firm where I could have an impact,” he said. “But in learning about the services that Baker & Daniels and a large firm can have, you can help the Hispanic communities or minorities on a larger scale. If you’re smaller, you can help one person do an immigration case here or there, but if you work for a bigger firm you have more services, more people that can help you.”

Delgado said he hopes other companies follow the kind of model Baker & Daniels has created.

“I guess I just hope that other firms and other corporations – not just law firms – seek their own initiatives, their own process, so that one day we can reflect what our nation looks like,” he said.•


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. G. Michael Witte letter states he's suspended for three years. The case that got him suspended is identical to my estate case, including havin the Late Judge Deiter recuse himself because Newman had a conflict of interest with the judge. His Modus Operandi is nearly identical.

  2. SIGNED BY G. MICHAEL WITTE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY INDIANA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DATED MAY 17, 2012.

    Your 6th complaint against Lawrence T. Newman filed on 4/12/2012. On 1/31/12, the Indiana Supreme Court entered an order suspending Lawrence T. Newman’s law license for a period of three years. More important, even after three years, Lawrence Todd Newman will not get his license back unless and until he goes through a separate proceeding to prove that he is fit to practice law. This is not an easy process, and the burden is upon Lawrence T. Newman to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he is fit to return to practice.
    Because of the length of Lawrence T. Newman’s license suspension and the fact he may never succeed in getting his law license reinstated, we are not opening an investigation file at this time.
    Should Lawrence T. Newman seek reinstatement in the future, we will open your file and ask Lawrence T. Newman to address your grievance as part of his burden of proving fitness. We have attempted to notify Lawrence T. Newman that this will be required of him.
    It may disappoint you to hear that we will be doing nothing on your grievance at this time. However, the most our office can ever accomplish is to take away a lawyer’s license to practice law. We have already done that, albeit as a result of misconduct in cases other than your own. It makes better sense for our office to focus its limited resources on cases where the lawyers are still actively practicing law.

  3. Is there any justice in the Marion County Superior Court Civil Division? I am the unfortunate victim of a retaliatory lawsuit brought by Lawrence Todd Newman, the attorney from an estate case on which I worked as a unsupervised personal representative in 2006. The contract agreement for that case stated that the estate would be responsible for all attorney fees, but Newman refused to close the nearly insolvent estate when my duties were complete and his fees were paid. Instead, he tried to extort additional attorney fees from me by keeping the case open to address a wrongful death claim, despite the estate’s heir’s lack of interest in pursuing it and an expert doctor’s opinion that it would not be worth doing so. He also knowingly deceived me into believing that a “closing statement” was needed to close the estate, even though this requirement had actually been waived by the estate’s heir. The heir’s attorney filed a motion to have Newman removed from the case. After the court closed the probate case with prejudice (barred from further litigation) Newman illegally re-opened the case in another courtroom.
    As a result of complaints filed against him for these and similar actions, Newman has been suspended from practicing law for 18 months by the Indiana Disciplinary Commission. In retaliation, he has filed suit against me demanding additional attorney fees for the 2006 estate case, despite the fact that I made no agreement stating that I would pay any fees from my own assets on behalf of the estate. This lawsuit violates the rules of ethics, due process of law, and equal protection of law. Newman has been allowed to file ridiculous pleadings at an alarming rate and has been supported by a biased court system. Judge Carroll refuses to recuse himself from the case despite the fact that, by his own admission, he intends to grant Newman sanctions regardless of the evidence. When my former counsel discovered that the previous judge on the case, Judge Sosin, was a long-time close friend of Newman’s family, Judge Carroll commented for the record during a hearing that Judge Sosin in so many words “he finds the door “was weak for recusing himself from the case as a result of this obvious conflict of interest.
    This case is a public policy issue. Statutes put in place to protect unsupervised personal representatives in probate matters are being ignored. This case will affect thousands of individuals involved in probating and the personal representation of estates. Justice cannot possibly be served as long as a biased judge is allowed to defend a “vexatious litigant,” as Newman has been described by Judge Logan in Bradenton, Florida court. If there is any justice in the Marion County Superior Court Civil Division, this case against me will be dismissed with prejudice.

  4. Every affront to decency and every style adopted by criminals is not per se a constituttional violation. Only fools believe or espouse that.

  5. This was an unnecessary change in law, a needless fiddling with a tax that impacted very very few hoosiers, but one that erodes a tax base benefitting very many hoosiers. Just because some people wanted to chalk up a "tax cut" on their legislative brag-list, and didnt give a fig about replacing the revenue any other way. Really stupid. I am a republican my whole life and this just shames me like hell. I have to use a fake name over this because I know my fellow republicans are all brain washed over tax cutting too.

ADVERTISEMENT