ILNews

Schools partner for performance, charity

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

For the fifth time in the past six years, the Feminist Law Society of the Indiana University School of Law - Indianapolis will present the "Vagina Monologues."

This year, students from the law school, along with the students from the Indiana University School of Medicine's chapters of the Student National Medical Association and the American Medical Women's Association, professors, and community members will perform the monologues.

Law student Danelle Cord, who had helped with other productions of the monologues when she was an undergraduate student, has been working with the Feminist Law Society's presentations of Eve Ensler's play in 2008, 2009, and this year.

To get the 17 confirmed performers, she said the Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis campus e-newsletter included information for anyone with an interest.

Proceeds will benefit two charities: 10 percent will go to the V-Day Campaign, which helps rape victims in the Democratic Republic of Congo; the other 90 percent will go to Legacy House in Indianapolis, a shelter for victims of domestic violence.

"We've had a different local organization every year," she said. Directors are "supposed to pick an organization that does something for violence against women. ... We're trying to spread it around. It also gives the organization a chance to get a little extra publicity."

In past years, money raised by ticket sales has gone to the Julian Center and the Indiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence.

Kerry Hyatt Blomquist, legal director of the ICADV, said a student asked her to participate. She will perform a monologue called "The Flood," where a woman in her 70s talks about her "down there" and dreams she would have about Burt Reynolds.

Blomquist said organizers of the event suggested performers look at their monologues on YouTube for ideas about how other women have performed them.

Stacy Files, who works for student services at the Indiana University Herron School of Art in Indianapolis, will be doing introductions for each monologue. She has been rehearsing with Blomquist.

She and Blomquist said some of the featured monologues are funny, some are sad, some are angry, but all are interesting.

Cord said for anyone who has seen the monologues or has never been but would like to, it's always "a different group of people, always a different twist, and always entertaining."

Last year, Cord said about 100 people attended an evening performance and 30 or 40 attended an afternoon performance. She's expecting more to attend this year.

The "Vagina Monologues" will be performed at 7:30 p.m. April 9 and 10 in the law school's Wynne Courtroom. Tickets are $10. Tickets can be purchased at the door with cash or check; tickets can also be purchased via PayPal by searching for femlaw@iupui.edu.
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Hmmmmm ..... How does the good doctor's spells work on tyrants and unelected bureacrats with nearly unchecked power employing in closed hearings employing ad hoc procedures? Just askin'. ... Happy independence day to any and all out there who are "free" ... Unlike me.

  2. Today, I want to use this opportunity to tell everyone about Dr agbuza of agbuzaodera(at)gmail. com, on how he help me reunited with my husband after 2 months of divorce.My husband divorce me because he saw another woman in his office and he said to me that he is no longer in love with me anymore and decide to divorce me.I seek help from the Net and i saw good talk about Dr agbuza and i contact him and explain my problem to him and he cast a spell for me which i use to get my husband back within 2 days.am totally happy because there is no reparations and side-effect. If you need his help Email him at agbuzaodera(at)gmail. com

  3. The practitioners and judges who hail E-filing as the Saviour of the West need to contain their respective excitements. E-filing is federal court requires the practitioner to cram his motion practice into pigeonholes created by IT people. Compound motions or those seeking alternative relief are effectively barred, unless the practitioner wants to receive a tart note from some functionary admonishing about the "problem". E-filing is just another method by which courts and judges transfer their burden to practitioners, who are the really the only powerless components of the system. Of COURSE it is easier for the court to require all of its imput to conform to certain formats, but this imposition does NOT improve the quality of the practice of law and does NOT improve the ability of the practitioner to advocate for his client or to fashion pleadings that exactly conform to his client's best interests. And we should be very wary of the disingenuous pablum about the costs. The courts will find a way to stick it to the practitioner. Lake County is a VERY good example of this rapaciousness. Any one who does not believe this is invited to review the various special fees that system imposes upon practitioners- as practitioners- and upon each case ON TOP of the court costs normal in every case manually filed. Jurisprudence according to Aldous Huxley.

  4. Any attorneys who practice in federal court should be able to say the same as I can ... efiling is great. I have been doing it in fed court since it started way back. Pacer has its drawbacks, but the ability to hit an e-docket and pull up anything and everything onscreen is a huge plus for a litigator, eps the sole practitioner, who lacks a filing clerk and the paralegal support of large firms. Were I an Indiana attorney I would welcome this great step forward.

  5. Can we get full disclosure on lobbyist's payments to legislatures such as Mr Buck? AS long as there are idiots that are disrespectful of neighbors and intent on shooting fireworks every night, some kind of regulations are needed.

ADVERTISEMENT